Colt, like many companies also suffered from the 'MBA' effect. To many companies get taken over by management professionals who think all products are the same, and that growth is nore imporatant that sales, profit and reputations. It's all about stock value.
Right now, this same transition is happening at Leupold. I've seen it in several firearms related companies. The people who founded the company, or who really understood the business get replaced by 'suits' with no understanding of their product or market, but have MBA degrees. They show great returns to the stockholders while they run the company into the ground.
I'm not sure what has been going on with Colt for the last 30 years, but they haven't produced anything new and innovative since the AA2000, and that was a disaster. Other designs seem to have come from the marketing department. How many good guns have been designed by commmitees based on focus groups?
BTW, according to at least one distributor I worked with, the Python was in high demand at the time they finally ended production, and was backordered by the distributor.
Colt cancelled the Mustang and other miniguns as part of a gentleman's agreement with CT not to sell 'Saturday Night Specials'. IIRC, there was also an issue with Kahr over a patent.
Finally, one of the things that is killing the big gun manufacturer is the NIH syndrone. There are hundred of talented gun designers out there, but the big gun companies only want to build what they have always built, or go with in house and often terrible committe designed guns.
Remingyon 770 anyone?
Right now, this same transition is happening at Leupold. I've seen it in several firearms related companies. The people who founded the company, or who really understood the business get replaced by 'suits' with no understanding of their product or market, but have MBA degrees. They show great returns to the stockholders while they run the company into the ground.
I'm not sure what has been going on with Colt for the last 30 years, but they haven't produced anything new and innovative since the AA2000, and that was a disaster. Other designs seem to have come from the marketing department. How many good guns have been designed by commmitees based on focus groups?
BTW, according to at least one distributor I worked with, the Python was in high demand at the time they finally ended production, and was backordered by the distributor.
Colt cancelled the Mustang and other miniguns as part of a gentleman's agreement with CT not to sell 'Saturday Night Specials'. IIRC, there was also an issue with Kahr over a patent.
Finally, one of the things that is killing the big gun manufacturer is the NIH syndrone. There are hundred of talented gun designers out there, but the big gun companies only want to build what they have always built, or go with in house and often terrible committe designed guns.
Remingyon 770 anyone?