Why do politicians put so much effort into the firearms topic?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Its very hard to walk a razor's edge.

Most do not want to piss off the NRA while also not having the Channel 5 News make them out to sound like baby-killers by taking quotes out of context.

Kharn
 
Tough Walking a Razor's Edge?

Are you kidding? It's EASY for Politicians to Walk a Razor's Edge. That's what they do FOR A LIVING! Say, do, support, resist, encourage, discourage anything & everything with the sole purpose of accumulating & maintaining enough support to re-elect them...PERIOD! Any side-step, dance-around, double-talk, double-deal, back-room, back-door, back-hand, back-alley, back-scratch handshake they can broker to do that...justifies their means.

I'm convinced if elected to the State House you instantly lose 25 I.Q. Points. If elected to the U.S. Congress, you lose 50. Men that leave home with good ideas & honorable habits come home having done NOTHING worthwhile, smelling like other people's money, and worried that some Senate Page decided their stained bloomers were a GREAT keepsake. (DAMN that DNA testing!)

Tough-to-walk-a-razors-edge my Aunt Fanny! I'm just looking for ONE politician who makes it clear that his opinion on topics DOESN'T MATTER. That he's there to vote THE OPINION of the people WHO HE REPRESENTS. That it's the best-interest & viewpoint of THE PEOPLE WHO SENT HIM that matter. Not this "I know better that you" crap! What a SHOCK it would be, when asked about Gun Control, if a Congressman said "I'll vote the way the majority of people in my District TELL me to vote"! THAT'S what DEMOCRACY means. How come nobody remembers?
 
politicians are the "ones" who should be worried!!

I don't know of any country, with a 2 party system, ever taking arms from their civilians.

Say you are a Rep. or Dem. politician--doesn't matter----If you or your party is NOT in "control" , YOU and YOUR body guards could also lose your "guns" and rights to own them also.

Then "things" would really GO TO HELL quick!!!

If they "controlling" party does "play hell" with our 2A, then "their" next step would be NO ONE "NOT" ON THEIR SIDE, can't have weapons either!!!
Then we could end up with just ONE party----like having a "King or Queen" or a Dictator.

Do you think that either "party" wants **** to go that far?????

Maybe them dumbasses ought to give a little thought to "their" futures!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top