Why do we need to find out who Mikey Magnum is?

That's why
Anyone ready to join the investigation?

 

It doesn't matter who he is, he gets his misinformation from the brady bunch. If you want to spend your time doing something, start at the source, not the mouthpiece.

 

Sure it does. He needs to be exposed, and all his dirty underwear needs to be dug up, incliding the name of the girl that set him up at the highschool prom. Then even the anti-gun fascists be disgusted by him.

 

You clearly don't understand you opponent. His lies are coming from the brady bunch and the cdc. The anti-gun crowd knows that their information is bogus, that's the reason they have to include 18-24 year-olds as "children" to get their "10 kids a day" lie.

 

O.K. But this guy actually believes in this! He doesn't work for them! He's a godd&&& employee of some extreme left rag!

 

Take a chill pill! He's not worth letting under your skin. And it's definitely not worth stooping to a dirty underwear level. We are on the HIgh Road, right?

 

Runt: We're talking about Credibility Warfare here. Not won without dirty underware throwing. Sorry. Tough luck.

 

Amen to that.

Take that energy and take somebody shooting or write a congressman or an editorial.

I get caught up in misdirected "energy" all the time. If we just direct it in the right place we can make a difference.

Let's get rid of the AWB. Think about how much this idiot will like that. Living well being the best revenge and all that.

Chris

 

I can't take anyone shooting - I'm in Israel. Same goes about congressmen. I've written a 2 editorials for Shamaya, a bunch letters to editors, and 2 articles for the Self-Defense Network .

I also preached RKBA at a MUN meeting.
I also preach RKBA (part-time) on the Democratic Underground.

And I hate hearing "best revenge is living well". I really do.

 

Okay, MicroBalrog, I'll give you an example of dirty underwear...

Somebody takes you to court over...whatever. It's his time to speak, so he goes on this tong tirade over how you stole the neighbor's car when you were thirteen, threw rocks at your ex-girlfriend's window , slept with your brother's wife, and...

"Wait! That has nothing to do with this court case!" you shout.

"But I'm talking about MicroBalrog's credibilty here! Tough luck!"

Shall I go on?

It's just my opinion, but if you want to convert fence-sitters and anti's over to our side, you've got to be the better person. And if you start hanging out dirty underwear, prepare to have yours clothespinned on the line as well.

 

Sorry didn't mean to upset you.

Wow, just realized you were in Israel. Stay safe.

Chris

 

I'm set and ready to roll. Bring it on, Mikey!


Seriously though, if whatever they say had to do with my credibility, than it would be OK for them legally to bring up my past crimes. Tough luck.

And yeah, you have to constantly DEMONSTRATE you're the better person.

 

Wow. I can understand how a murder investigation may be helped by uncovering the violent past actions of someone on trial, but I had no idea that (in this case) author credibility relied on one's criminal record. Is that how you see things? That somehow Mikey Magnum's past history of (making this up here) bouncing checks at KMart can discredit his writing? How about using cold, hard gun facts against his innaccurate gun facts (which is nothing more than comedy to me)?

Fantastic! So you won't be wasting your time digging around to see if ol' Mikey Magnum had a one-night stand while he was married and took Viagra when his doctor told him not to because of his heart condition?

 

Thank you for distorting my post:

If I can, say, prove, that Mike Magnum is a guy named N. Idiot, a member of a Communist/Trozkyist group, mentally disturbed.
and paid for by VPC money - what will that do?

Actually, I do have a statement, made by a Brady representative, claiming that most Brady activist are people who were psychologically traumatised by gun violence.

And, if I were a witness that tends to consume drugs and has a history of mental disturbance and receives huge sums of money from defendant, that would be relevant to my credibility.

 

Personally, all I want to do to Mikey is let some sunlight shine on him so he can't hide behind a facade anymore.

He's a coward and his true identity should be revealed. That's enough for me. If he has the balls to go on writing this junk then, let him.

 

Exactly.

 

WHO IS Mike Magnum?:

whois gunguys.com?
Organization:
Gun Guys.com
Mike Magnum
P.O. Box 618354
Chicago, Il 60661
US
Phone: 312-474-0461
Email: [email protected]

 

Nah...

It's been done recently (by me). LRS is the company which gives them hosting. McClleland office denied being affiliated with them.

 

same PO box:
http://www.itsariot.com/who/join.html

Organization:
Gonzo Schexnayder
Gonzo Schexnayder
624 W. Surf, #3A
Chicago, IL 60657
US
Phone: 312-545-8315
Email: [email protected]

Registrar Name....: Register.com
Registrar Whois...: whois.register.com
Registrar Homepage: http://www.register.com

Domain Name: ITSARIOT.COM

Created on..............: Fri, Aug 23, 2002
Expires on..............: Sat, Aug 23, 2003
Record last updated on..: Mon, Nov 11, 2002

Administrative Contact:
Gonzo Schexnayder
Gonzo Schexnayder
624 W. Surf, #3A
Chicago, IL 60657
US
Phone: 312-545-8315
Email: [email protected]

Technical Contact, Zone Contact:
Register.Com
Domain Registrar
575 8th Avenue - 11th Floor
New York, NY 10018
US
Phone: 902-749-2701
Fax..: 902-749-5429
Email: [email protected]

Domain servers in listed order:

DNS2.EARTHLINK.NET 207.217.77.12
DNS3.EARTHLINK.NET

 

This site (gunguys.com) is just the on-line version of a liberal talk show. A bunch of misinformation and garbage. One-sided opinion pieces meant to sway the sheep. Nothing new.

Anyone going to this site will understand the bias immediately. If they agree, they will chuckle at the "gun nuts". If they disagree, they may fume or laugh at the idiocy.

Not much more to do than that. Even if you write a concise e-mail that blows away his/her point of view, what are the chances he/she will print it?

-Pytron

 

Gonzo Schexnayder, Executive Producer & Head Writer

Gonzo has been performing comedy professionally since the age of 6, when his first joke was a response to a question his sister posed to their mom while driving through south Louisiana's lovely scenic vistas. "Mom," she said, "what's a womb?" Gonzo quickly interjected (timing is everything), "That's what a motorcycle runs on. Woooom, wooooom." It was also his first road show.

Besides comedy, he has performed in comedic plays, improvisational comedy and sketch-comedy shows, as a stand-up comedian, and in voiceovers, commercials, films and television, most of which he got paid for, some of which were comedy. He has also written comedy, in nearly all those formats and a few others (especially if you laugh at his poetry).

His theatre credits include I Hate Hamlet (comedy), Lovers and Other Strangers (comedy), The Death of Bessie Smith (not a comedy) and his critically acclaimed Humpty Dumpty in Alice in Wonderland (kid's comedy). He was a founding member of the improvisational comedy group, Troupe Therapy, and the improv/sketch-comedy company, Broad Shoulders. He has studied at The Second City in Chicago and The Groundlings in L.A. He juggles, plays guitar (carelessly), and can do something weird with his stomach. He shares his life with his beautiful singing wife, Callie, and their imaginary friends.


Gonzo created Splatter Effect to fulfill his desire to write and perform satire and comedy that provokes people into using their noggins.


http://www.splattereffect.com/bios.html

 

ding!:
http://www.splattereffect.com/archives/wits060500.html

WITS AND HALF-WITS

Wit by Gonzo

Kill them all. It's the children's fault anyway. Shoot them in the head one by one and we'll end children's violence. If the children are all dead -- logic would say -- you won't have violence committed by children.

Why have we overlooked this simple fact? It's the damn kids that screw it all up. They're the ones that don't understand how powerful a gun can be. They're the ones sneaking guns from closets and shoe drawers, running around messing everything up. They're the ones who can't shoot straight.

I was in the military. I know. I spent eight weeks carrying, loading, assembling, disassembling, aiming, adjusting, cleaning and shooting one M-16 rifle. I was qualified to kill.

I knew what a single 5.56 millimeter round from a well-aimed U.S. Military-issued M-16 (civilian issue AR-15) can do. It can take your face off. Well, an adult, with a fully-formed head, might only lose half their face. But, if you aim right at a child's little head, on either side, right behind the cheek, where the jaw bone meets the rest of the skull, you could probably take out more than half a face and even part of the spine. What amazing efficiency!

If kids had any idea about the killing power of a well-placed bullet from an M-16, they'd either leave guns alone completely or pick them up like a whore picks up syphilis.

Why did Dylan and Eric waste their time with so many small weapons? Why did they waste their time with little toy bombs and writing and Web pages? Why did they leave so many wounded? With all that fire power, why did they ONLY kill 10 people (not including themselves, because any fool can kill themselves)?

Because they were kids. They were dumbass kids who didn't know their ??? from a hole in a barrel. Because they were motivated by feelings and not by skill. And because of that, they bought dumb weapons (a TEC9, puh-lease) and built bad bombs (propane bombs, puh-lease -- were we going to barbecue afterwards?).

That's why we have to kill all the children -- because they have the potential to kill badly. Because they gun down English teachers with handguns while being videotaped. Because they kill, but don't plan an escape. Stupid, stupid, stupid.

We could take the time and tax dollars to train them effectively. We could take their youth away from them and enroll them in military school starting with first grade. We could teach them how to hold a rifle, how to aim it correctly, and how to kill with extreme prejudice.

But that would take effort and time and a sense of concern that seems to have slipped from my mind (and yours, too, I bet). I've given up on getting rid of the guns -- too many obstacles.

So, my money's on killing the kids.

 

Yup, that seems to be the guy. Now, how do we prove that?

 

What do you want to "prove" and to whom and why?

The guy is just a frustrated dramatic type with a "mission".

I am sure he would welcome any attempt to shed light on his little crusade.

If you want to get him, why not parody his parody?

 

Hey, I have an idea brewing...
But I want to know for sure who he is before I'm implementing it.