Why does Knife = Weapon????!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Didorian

Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2003
Messages
119
Location
Maxton, NC
I don't get it..... no matter where I go, I here this... A knife is a weapon...
It dosen't matter what kind of kinfe, folding, fixed, small, large...
To the average person a knife is a weapon....
When did this happen, and what can be done about it short of mass brainwashing???




D.
 
Well, ever since Unga Dag, who is credited as being the first Neanderthal to create a knife like weapon for survival, things just kinda took off. :D

Seriously though, nothing can be done about it, short of mass brainwashing. Sorry man.
 
Why does Knife =Weapon????!!!

Most states do not have knife laws, per se.

Knives are grouped into the "dangerous weapons" statutes with other objects and will have their own subsection which will define a states restricted objects and those objects restrictions if allowed in some form.

Where blades are concerned there is usually a restriction on double edge, autos, dirks, daggers, etc.

Knives are dangerous weapons. They are easily used to kill/mame/injure others when used in anger. They are easily concealed about ones person.

With the first man to put/chip an edge onto a tool where it would cut, he has used this knowledge to feed himself by killing other animals. In so doing he consumed protein which over time developed the brain more.

You can travel around the country and see different knife laws and restrictions for the area you are in. Some are based on cultural beliefs as in New Orleans and Arkanasa which forbid Bowies specifically and restrict folder lengths as well.
This due to their culter in the 1800-1850 range where duals with Bowies occured regularly. Everyman was "armed" with a Bowie knife and they armed themselves with a very efficient killing tool through it's design.

Some knives like dirks, daggers and the like are restricted most everywhere as their intended purpose is to "kill" another human being. They can not be considered defensive tools nor were they designed thusly.

There are plenty of states which allow us to carry a fairly good blade length in straight and folder guise. Each state has their own specifics so one is prudent to research the pertinent laws relative carrying concealed weapons and the particulars for knives considered "dangerous weapons" in that state befor doing so.

Asking a police officer is no defense when you have been arrested for illegal carry. You need to obtain the laws in writing and if unsure of their meaning to contact the AG's office for clarification. An atty: can be contacted who can then research and let you know what the law would be interpreted to mean.

I carry a copy of my state statute relative knives in my glovebox. There is no blade length restriction but the cops for the most part believe it's 4 inches. Of course they confiscate your toys and then have to be spanked at the station while they return the folder at a later date. It's happened twice and thats why I carry hard copy in the car now.

In case you are wondering I spy on people for a living and have been caught over so many years many times and dealt with the LE boys. They always want to take the toys away and if you can show them the statute in writing and they persist in confiscation you now would have recourse against him for theft of property [yours ].

Most don't want to muck with the boys [ I was one myself for 9 years ] and so would give up the tool.

Know your locations statutes and restrictions and abide buy them. Keep a copy with you and be prepared.

Brownie
 
I agree that LEOs are a bad source of legal information.

TX says that anything under 5.25 blade length is legal. I've had LEOs tell me just about everything from "It must be shorter than the width of my palm (!!!??)" to "6 inches is OK."

Back in the good old days when knives were legal on airplanes, I had one security officer try to take a knife because it was longer than her badge. When I quoted her the regs and pulled out the ruler I carried for just that purpose, she backed down.

Carrying a copy of the regs, or at least knowing them is very important.

Your argument about knives not automatically being weapons applies to many types of firearms as well. I'd like to see someone hold up a store with an unlimited class bench-rest rifle which might weigh 100 lbs or more or one of the big .50 cal rifles. Still, the law sees them as weapons, and no amount of education will change that.
 
In Illinois, there is a clause in the deadly weapons act that states that a deadly weapon can be any "dangerous knife."

So, any knife used with intent to commit harm or commit a crime in Illinois is a deadly weapon, and as it should be.

There are of course the usual automatic "you have a weapon" vis-a-vis dirks, daggers, and switchblades, etc. But the reality is all knives are dangerous weapons if used as such.

You could include baseball bats as well. The key is intent.
 
JohnKSa: the Texas blade length rule is "must be UNDER 5.5 inches" (and also must be single-edge).

I know that because I looked it up when I was convincing REKAT to make the Sifu. We settled on a blade length of 5.45" to meet the Texas spec and open that market up :). It appears Darrel Ralf and Camillus copied the same idea for the Maxx series?

Measure the "stabbing penetration depth", tip to grip, ignoring the thumbstud. If the Maxx turns out to be 5.5" on the money, a bit of "sharpening" should get it a hair under :).
 
It's ridiculous... I realized our country was a lost cause when a kid had a compass confiscated during a weapons check at my highschool... That is to say, he took the compass home to do his Geometry homework and had it confiscated bringing it back.

Superintendant was there as was a couple of news crews since it was the 'first routine weapons check' in the school district. Of course, they started with the least violent school by far. :rolleyes:

Being a typical rebelious teenager, I asked what would happen if I refused to allow them to search me. They're (rent a cop security) said I would be suspended for three days for insubordination. I asked since when were students in a position to be insubordinate to a rent a cop. They didn't like that too much. I decided to go home instead of letting search me and they said I wasn't allowed to leave school grounds. I asked them exactly what they were going to do to stop an 18 year old from walking down the sidewalk. Then I told the superintendant what he could do with his media ploy of an ill-planned weapons search. And they let me in fine the next day. ;)

I figure all has gone to hell when the superintendant of a major school district can't (or decides not to) outwit an 18 year old punk.
 
What I really hate is when someone calls a gun a weapon.:cuss: My pencil could be a weapon if used in that manner, but until then it's just a pencil.
 
Your pencil is not a weapon because the pencils design and intended purpose is not to harm others but intended for other purposes.

A firearms design and intended role is to inflict injury or death to others, the pencils design perameters are not the same.

The pencil can be deployed in an "unconventional" role as a weapon which is not the same thing.

If a gun is not a weapon, what do you call it? It's a weapon no matter how you look at it.


Brownie
 
I call it a gun. It's not a weapon until it's used as one. Until then it's a tool.


Reguardless of what you call it, calling it a weapon just feeds the anti's. And for that alone I hate to refer to anything as a weapon.
 
A firearms design and intended role is to inflict injury or death to others...

If you read the manual to any firearm, it specifically states that it is NOT to be used to harm others. Seems like anyone who shoots someone is using it "unconventionally" (according to your definition).

I get a giggle anytime I see a "NO WEAPONS ALLOWED" sign (& I see one every day at work) b/c I seem to find ways that almost any object could be used as a weapon (pen, chair, sheet, etc.). Guess that means that I'm always "armed"...:evil:
 
Weapons are defined in your states statutues under "dangerous weapons".

Guns are included and restricted there.

The manual may state the intended purpose is "not to harm others" but what a manufacturer stated [ for liability and to please their attys: ] is quite different from reality.

If you take the stance that "your" gun is strictly defensive in nature you are only stating "your" intended use of same, but in so doing have defined a "weapon".

"Smallarms" are weapons, whether you use it defensively or offensively--whether you use it legally or illegally is subjective and dependant on an individuals preference to use the same tool.

Objects that are specifically designed for defense of your person are by that very definition intended and carried by us to reciprocate the attackers desire to harm us first.

Definitions/description of weapons per the American Heritage dictionary as follows:

"An instrument used in offensive or defensive combat"
"A part of the body, such as an animals horns or claws"
"A means employed to disarm, persuade, or get the better of another"

The gun would be a conventional weapon and the stick, bat, ashtray off the bar top, curtain rod etc would be unconventional weapons.

Now fellas, you can play semantics all day with your definition of what YOU call your gun but it matters not as you see you still are subject to the laws of your state and they all state a gun is a weapon clearly in their statutes. Using that tool will be considered using a dangerous/deadly weapon.

Look at it this way--a jury of your peers [ who will be judging you as a defendant ] will consider the gun you used a dangerous weapon. They have no choice based on instructions to the jurors relative what the "law" says, not what you and your atty: attempt to call it.

The general consensus is that a gun is a weapon. It's main purpose to inflict injury of another. Is your gun used in defense of yourself or another? Then it meets the dictionary definition doesn't it.

Carried further, when you are asked why you were carrying a gun in the first place your answer would be?--to protect [ defend ] myself if necessary? Then you have met the description in the dictionary.

You weren't carrying that snubby for target practice were you?
Snubs don't lend themselves well to target practice do they?
You armed yourself with a deadly weapon and used same to defend yourself. Cklassic description according to the dictionary meaning of the word.

You did not carry the gun as a bludgeoning tool did you? Of course not. And nobody would believe you if you told them that in a courtroom.

Semantics only get you more jail time if you have erred in your judgement to use such tools. Tools can be dangerous weapons [either conventional or unconventional ]. The gun as a tool is a conventional weapon. People see guns and they know that they were designed for one thing, to put projectiles downrange where if they come into contact with a human body the expectation is that you will likely die from such action.

You say tomato, I say tomaaaato. Call it anything you like but keep in mind you will be judged by others instructed by the courts that you were carrying a dangerous weapon [ the gun ].

If it were not so you would have no reason to "carry" it around town. If it's intended purpose really was for target practice or hunting you would not have been carrying it on your person in downtown podunk, USA.

Not many animals to hunt legally in the projects of the inner city now is there?

They'll ask you why you own one.
They'll ask you why you were carrying one.
They'll ask you why you practiced on humanoid targets if you were not intending to use it for defense of your person.
They'll ask you why you feel it is not a weapon.

All of your answers had better make more sense than just "I call it a gun" as you will be saying that all the way to your new home with bars on the doors and windows.

Cops carry weapons [ guns ] to defend/protect the general public from others who may attempt to cause various types of harm to us.

If you can get by that one with a jury of 12--you have done well.

Play the game if you will but in the end a gun is a weapon. Your refusal to admit that may give the authorities enough reason to rescind your permit.

It's called a "concealed weapons" permit for a reason. People need one to conceal a "weapon" on their person. Usually that permit involves "guns" [which are weapons]. If they weren't considered weapons you would not need to get a "weapons permit", right?

Brownie
 
Gettin' a little touchy-feely, here, aren't we? Knives are weapons. Items not designed to be weapons can certainly be used as weapons, but that doesn't negate the term. Items designed as weapons can be used for perfectly peaceful uses, but again, that doesn't render the term "weapon" meaningless.

If a knife or a gun is not a weapon, then the term "weapon" has lost all meaning.

And what is so awful about weapons anyway?
 
In my opinion, a $3 kitchen knife is not a weapon, not against a human anyway. A $100 is not a weapon either. My little CRKT P.E.C.K. isn't intended as a weapon. My CRKT M16 is a weapon it is designed and intended as such. A 22 bolt rifle used to shoot paper isn't a weapon but could be used as such; on the other hand, my P32 is absolutely a weapon. When I carry it, the only reason I would use it would to be to thwart, hopefully, or injure or kill someone meaning to cause me harm.

I'm all for the 'tool' rationale. But I think any knife with a tanto blade and a thumb opener that can be slung open quickly simply must be considered as a weapon. Same with a handgun carried on one's person. It is a tool in that it allows an officer to do his or her job with more confidence and sometimes with more immediate effect but it is absolutely a weapon by the old and more modern definitions.
 
In fact, in Massachusets a kitchen knife is exempt from the dangerous weapons statute by case law in 1994.

In most states the kitchen knife will be illegal to carry [ on your person ] as the blade length will most likely be over the allowed limit [ if there is one at all ]. In the kitchen it would not be considered a weapon until such time as it was used as one.

A .22 cal rifle would be clasified as a weapon [ it's a firearm ].
If you have to have a firearms ID card or permit to carry it is by definition a weapon [classified as such by the state ].

Keep in mind that if the "law" says it is classified as weapon, then it will be consideredas such whether you agree with it or not. Thats how you'll be tried/prosecuted [ by the letter fo the law ].

Knives are considered dangerous weapons and are regulated to some degree within the "dangerous weapons" statutes of the various states.

Po's are issued firearms to protect the public. They are not issued tools. They deal with "levels of force constraints" and are issued weapons with which to do their job of protecting the public.

A tool he might carry is a multi-tool, no designed to injure but certainly could as it comes with two blades as a rule.

Brownie
 
This is so true. I carry a ColdSteel folder with a pocket clip and I get remarks like "No Weapons Allowed". Im like Duh? its a pocket knife with a pocket clip.
 
I'm going with 'weapon' being all about intent. My knife, thumb stud and all, has never been used as a weapon. (whoever posted about 'any knife with a thumb stud and tanto blade is automatically a weapon' is a little confused. Cosmetic features dude, just like the assault rifle laws). None of my guns have ever been used as a weapon. Look how many million guns are sold or in private hands and how many are used as weapons.

So, my pocketknife (evil features and all:rolleyes: ) is not a weapon because I use it for other tasks. It could be used as a weapon.

If I have any firearm, people want to call it a weapon, even if I use it for other tasks. It could be used as a weapon.

But, if I carried a handgun, people would say that is a weapon b/c have no use for it otherwise.

This gets us to having to 'prove a use' and 'intent' again which is all up in the air. So weapon is an entirely relative word. It's just a word, afterall.

Oh, yeah, I use my thumb stud b/c it is better than using my teeth. Not that it should make any difference. That logic that guy used is really getting to me:banghead:
 
JohnKSa: the Texas blade length rule is "must be UNDER 5.5 inches" (and also must be single-edge).
You are right, of course. I've known that for years. I can't even claim a typo, because that's what I meant to type.

I did get it right in my earlier post about the legality of the ASP baton... I'm not sure what was going on in my head last night.
 
brownie0486, I think we're definately on the same page here. I was just playing the semantics game like some other folks were. ;)
 
speaking of semantics, more people have been killed by kitchen knives than any "tactical" knife...

RL
 
How true about kitchen knives holding that distinction.

They are not illegal in the kitchen but would be considered carrying a concealed weapon [ possibly illegal dependant on the your locations laws ] on the street [ in public ] mostly due to their blade length.

Domestic violence is one of two areas police are trained to be extra vigilant responding to. More cops are killed at traffic stops and domestic calls than all other types combined.

Kitchen knives play a big role in domestic violence and injury for a reason. They are within easy reach [access ]. Conversely we can now understand why they would be deemed illegal on the streets.

Carrying a kitchen knife in public might give one the idea there was premeditation [ intent ] on the wearers/bearers part to inflict injury on someone [ whether in a defensive or offensive role ].

Numbers play a part in this scenario as well. Anyone care to guess how many kitchen knives are in households vs. tactical folders? The shear volume [ commonality ] of one over the other would bring the results stated.

Brownie
 
makdaddy03


Thank you... remarks such as those are why I asked my question in the first place......
I can understand that you can't avoid seeing a gun as anything but a weapon... This makes it neither good nor evil, seeing as how no wepon can use it's self, (Aside from the human being, and other animals)........
But a knife that you carry on you, actually HAS USES.....
And no, I might not need it today, or tomorrow... but I almost guarantee you that I use my knife at least once in a week. And there are times that I'll need to use it several times in a single day...
It's all just one jumbled mess. And the public, either because of the media or the fact that lots of kids are being raised as cowards now a days or a little of both, are so uninformed that they make it hard on the ones that have no intention of useing a knife as a weapon unless put in such a situation that it is required to stay healthy and whole.... And then, honestly, in that situation, that's when I use my gun.


It all just IRRITATES the S(-)1T out of me.......
 
"Why does Knife =Weapon????!!!"

In my State a knife IS considered a Deadly
Weapon with good reason.

From 21 feet it's not difficult for some one to reach you and gut you
in about 1.5 seconds.........How many can draw and successfully engage in an "unanounced" 1.5 sec. window?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top