Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Why does my new Daniel Defense M4 feel like a toy...?

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by SilentStalker, Jun 20, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. SilentStalker

    SilentStalker Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,278
    Location:
    Somewhere in the U.S., London, or Australia
    I am serious! I like the fact that it is lightweight but overall the thing feels like a toy, especially when compared to some of my other ARs like my Bushmaster Preban. The Bushmaster seems much more robust and appears like it would handle a helluva lot more abuse granted it is a heavy barrel but dang. The DD feels like a .22 or something. The caliber just says multiple. It's supposed to be chambered for 5.56 so technically it could be multiple-caliber and it has some kind of etched thing saying 5.56 on the upper but it is not stamped as such. Everything looks correct and functions correct aside from actually shooting it since I have not taken it to the range but dang I am impressed with how light it is. If you guys get the chance to handle a DD M4 v5 LW I suggest you pick it up and try it out!
     
  2. C-grunt

    C-grunt Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2005
    Messages:
    3,757
    Location:
    Phoenix Az
    It was made to be lightweight. It might feel less robust than the Bushy but that definitely isnt the case.
     
  3. Fremmer

    Fremmer Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2009
    Messages:
    2,284
    Carry it around all day and then take a nice long hike, and you'll realize why. :D
     
  4. MCgunner

    MCgunner Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2005
    Messages:
    24,960
    Location:
    The end of the road between Sodom and Gomorrah Tex
    It's why they were called "Mattel" rifles 50 years ago. I don't care for the tacticool, some do. Weight isn't a concern for me and when it is, I have a Remington M7 for spot and stalk.
     
  5. dom1104

    dom1104 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2007
    Messages:
    1,366
    "Why is my lightweight gun lightweight?!"

    I dont know what to tell you about that bud.
     
  6. SpeedAKL

    SpeedAKL Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2007
    Messages:
    1,027
    Location:
    McLean, VA
    It feels like a toy because it's so light and balanced:). I'm really itching for a new lightweight carbine right now, and DD makes some of the best ARs on the market. If you want to feel an amazingly well-balanced gun, try a KAC SR-25. INCREDIBLE.

    I had one of those HBAR Bushies for awhile. It ran quite well but it was a heavy SOB up front! Those HBAR barrels don't have any significant accuracy benefit since they aren't necessarily cut to better tolerances. The HBAR may have a slight advantage when both barrels get hot, but for carbines who cares?
     
  7. jim243

    jim243 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2009
    Messages:
    1,992
    Wait till more and more come out with carbon-fiber uppers and lowers, then you will see what a light weight is all about. (5.6 lbs)

    Jim
     
  8. SilentStalker

    SilentStalker Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,278
    Location:
    Somewhere in the U.S., London, or Australia
    ^^^its not much of a weight savings IMO. My DD tips the scales at 5.8 pounds and that is with the full Omega rail...
     
  9. G.barnes

    G.barnes Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2011
    Messages:
    352
    if it's to light you could always add a laser,huge flashlight, bipod and overkill scope for that tacticool look and it'll help make it feel more like your hbar bushy
     
  10. JustinJ

    JustinJ Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Messages:
    4,046
    Location:
    Austin, TX
  11. kwelz

    kwelz Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,835
    Location:
    Henryville, IN
  12. 68wj

    68wj Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2010
    Messages:
    1,654
    Location:
    Upstate
    Must be something wrong with it because, "weight is sign of reliability":
    [​IMG]
     
  13. moxie

    moxie Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    3,069
    Location:
    Erath Co., TX
    50 years ago, they were Mattel-like. The light plastic triangular handguards were "twisty." The buffer went "twang" when you shot the rifle. The mags were junk. These and other issues have been fixed. The AR is now a solid and reliable gun.
     
  14. JustinJ

    JustinJ Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Messages:
    4,046
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Well, i'm not sure about carbine length vs carbine length but i don't think midlength aluminum will be lighter than carbine plastic.
     
  15. 12131

    12131 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2007
    Messages:
    1,541
    Location:
    God's Country (TEXAS)
    "Lighter, Stronger, Better"
     
  16. kwelz

    kwelz Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,835
    Location:
    Henryville, IN
    Stock Double heat shield handguards are 9.3 oz.
    Midlength Plastic Handguards run around 12 oz.

    A carbine Length Omega X rail is 9.5 oz.
    A Mid length Omega X is 11.7 oz

    So going to a middy Omega x gains you less than 2.5 oz.

    Just for comparison a 13" Troy Alpha rail is 11.4 oz. There is a reason they are my new preference. :)
     
  17. Texan Scott

    Texan Scott Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2012
    Messages:
    3,184
    Location:
    The Texas Hill Country
    idunno... is the furniture beech or walnut?
    .
    .
    .
    .
    OOoooooohhh... THAT'S why it feels like a toy! :D
     
  18. madcratebuilder

    madcratebuilder Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2007
    Messages:
    5,020
    Location:
    Northern Orygun
    Plastic hand guards as heavy as a aluminum rail????:confused: Are you using lead heat shields? A plastic single heat shield M4 hand guard weights under 3oz, about ten grams under depending on maker.

    You need to calibrate your scale. Double heat shield M4 hand guards are under 5oz.



    Most lower's today are marked Multi Cal. Look at the end of the barrel, in front of the gas block, it should be marked with chamber size and twist rate.
     
  19. SpentCasing

    SpentCasing Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2010
    Messages:
    559
    Location:
    Cleveland, OH
    Madcrate,

    Now add the cap and detla ring weight also too. All in all the aluminum FF rails do end up being lighter.
     
  20. kwelz

    kwelz Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,835
    Location:
    Henryville, IN
    [​IMG]

    9.1 here. Unless you are calling Paul from BCM a liar.
     
  21. SilentStalker

    SilentStalker Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,278
    Location:
    Somewhere in the U.S., London, or Australia
    To whoever was asking, I weighed the rifle myself. However, thst weight will be going up soon as I am fixing to mount a scope and back up sights on it. Oh, and the weight was with the DD forearm grip still attached.
     
  22. madcratebuilder

    madcratebuilder Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2007
    Messages:
    5,020
    Location:
    Northern Orygun
    When you add the barrel nut it does weigh more. Now show the weights of the aluminum rails with there proprietary barrel nut and all mounting hardware.

    The argument that aluminum rails are as light as plastic is invalid IMHO.
     
  23. jad0110

    jad0110 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2006
    Messages:
    4,027
    Location:
    Somewhere between the Eastern Block states and Flo
    I had a Del-Ton HBAR 16" middy upper on my Doublestar lower for a while. The muzzle heavy balance was exaggerated by the light CAR 6-position adjustable stock. IMHO, the balance was all wrong. Sure, it was a bit more stable when shooting off hand for maximum accuracy. But that really isn't the point of a 16" carbine, at least in my opinion. Since then I swapped the HBAR upper for a pencil barrel BCM 16" mid length upper and it completely transformed the feel and balance. The only other carbine I've held that balances better for me is my M-1.

    Actually, the buffer still goes "twang".
     
  24. Orlando

    Orlando Member

    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2008
    Messages:
    1,333
    Location:
    Ohio
    50 years ago the mags were junk????
    Thats a new one on me. I am using those 1960's 20 rd mags today. They all function great and I actually prefer them
     
  25. kwelz

    kwelz Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,835
    Location:
    Henryville, IN
    Opinion without data is irrelevant.

    I hate to tell you, but those weights do include the mounting hardware. For instance here is the M4 rail with barrel nut and ring.

    [​IMG]
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page