I would think that the chamber changes with wear and cleaning. I wonder how well the first round fired would match up with the 2000th...
It's for the base of the case, not the chamber marks, which of course will change with a barrel swap. The Glock especially makes marks not only on the primer, but on the rear of the cartridge.
It was merely a way of harassing some of the gun makers to refuse to ship to Maryland (and for liberal politicians to tell the ignorant voters who vote for them they did "something" to stop gun violence), as the evidence is inadmissible in a Maryland court. For the data from the spent case to be used in a trial, there MUST be a chain-of-custody that is unbroken from the time the gun was fired to the time the spent case was entered into the data base. So you have to subpoena the guy who test fired the gun, the guy at the gun company who sealed the gun case for shipping, the folks at the gun wholesalers to say the gun case remained sealed, the folks at the gun shop that sold the gun to say the gun case arrived sealed and they sent the spent brass still sealed in the envelope to the state police, and the person at the state police to testify the envelope arrived sealed. BUT..., there is NO requirement for anybody to mark the envelopes across the flaps to when sealed..., so any clown with tea kettle could steam them open, and change the brass. There is also a requirement for spent casings to be provided for revolvers..., 'cause they get so many revolvers ejecting cases at shootings NOT.
IF they recovered a gun used in a crime, they could test fire it, and compare it to casings found on the ground of a crime scene...standard procedure...., but that doesn't prove the gun was fired at the crime scene, only that a recovered piece of brass belongs to that gun. How tough would it be for a person to pick up a random spent case at the public firing range to drop at a crime scene ? A very easy way to screw up the evidence trail if the piece dropped matched the caliber of the gun that was used in the crime. They don't always recover slugs from shooting scenes, and those they do recover don't always provide enough marks to make a ballistic comparison. It's a silly waste of taxpayers' money.
LD