StopTheGrays
Member
http://www.wiscnews.com/bnr/news/index.php?ntid=69812&ntpid=0
There were some quotes from our side but those made to much sense and were not as funny as those listed above.
I also found this online poll. So far it is about 50%-50%.
http://www.wiscnews.com/pdr/
Poll about CCW
Do you believe allowing residents to carry concealed weapons poses a safety risk to your community?
Yes
No
Not sure
http://www.duluthsuperior.com/mld/duluthsuperior/13675034.htm
AP story from Minnesota about our veto override chances. The article is neither pro nor anti CCW and is pretty fair. One part in there has me a little scared though:
Sauk County Sheriff Randy Stammen said the law is poorly written and will not help protect citizens he said are already relatively safe.
"Crime rates in Wisconsin do not support a change in our 130-year-old public policy nor does research support the statement by the bill's authors that carrying a concealed weapon will reduce violent crime," Stammen said. "Law enforcement firmly believes in a person's right to protect themselves, but this... does not warrant further consideration."
Jeff Wiswell, public affairs council for the Wisconsin Sheriffs and Deputy Sheriffs Association, which opposes the bill, said the few positive changes in the proposal since the last attempt do not outweigh the larger issues. He said an amendment to the bill to lower the blood alcohol content limit for people carrying concealed weapons from .08 to .02 is not enough.
"We believe anybody who carries a weapon and then conceals that weapon should be at absolute sobriety," Wiswell said.
Stammen said the 21-day period to conduct background checks is not enough to do the job properly.
Baraboo Police Chief Dennis Kluge said he is mainly concerned about the bill's effect on children.
"We will see more people purchasing firearms without having adequate training and these will be stored in homes and other places," Kluge said. "There will be more potential for children to come across these things."
Kluge said in general, he does not see any need for people to carry guns around with them.
"There is a time and place but daily activities is not it," Kluge said. "I anticipate (passing the concealed weapons bill) will bring on more problems, not just for law enforcement (but) also for general citizens too."
There were some quotes from our side but those made to much sense and were not as funny as those listed above.
I also found this online poll. So far it is about 50%-50%.
http://www.wiscnews.com/pdr/
Poll about CCW
Do you believe allowing residents to carry concealed weapons poses a safety risk to your community?
Yes
No
Not sure
http://www.duluthsuperior.com/mld/duluthsuperior/13675034.htm
AP story from Minnesota about our veto override chances. The article is neither pro nor anti CCW and is pretty fair. One part in there has me a little scared though:
Sounds like we may have a situation like last time. Anybody know what Doyle might be offering to him that would make him hedge?The override vote is expected to come down to those six Democrats, who are likely to face heavy lobbying from both sides. The six are Reps. Barbara Gronemus of Whitehall, Mary Hubler of Rice Lake, Marlin Schneider of Wisconsin Rapids, John Steinbrink of Pleasant Prairie, Terry Van Akkeren of Sheboygan and Amy Sue Vruwink of Milladore.
Gunderson said he believes Hubler, Schneider, Gronemus and Vruwink will stay with Republicans. Steinbrink and Van Akkeren promised him they would vote to override, too, he said.
"The only thing I can have is a person's word," Gunderson said.
Vruwink aide John Anderson said she would likely vote to override, and Schneider said he would vote to override as well.
Van Akkeren, though, said he never promised Gunderson anything.
"I'll be making my decision when it comes to the floor. At this point I'm not decided," he said.