Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Wife and I having hard time deciding between 7mm-08 and 6.5x55

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Greywolf, Dec 1, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Greywolf

    Greywolf Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    205
    Location:
    Tampa, FL
    Having a VERY hard time deciding between the two. Going to be a Tikka Lite rifle, mostly for wife. Need light recoil, long-range accuracy, easy to reload, ability to use against varmints and larger game (deer/elk). It appears that they are both pretty damn equal in many ways, though it seems that reloading for the 7mm-08 will be less costly, and that finding good QUALITY 6.5x55 brass means having to buy the foreign stuff (.60-$1.00 a piece).

    Also, the 7mm-08 is a short action vs. the long action for the 6.5x55. Don't know if that is a plus or not?
     
  2. gvnwst

    gvnwst Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,614
    Location:
    Somewhere.........
    Unless you NEED the bullet selection of the 6.5, the 7mm has good brass, light recoil, and grreat accuracy. Plus short action is nice.
     
  3. dakotasin

    dakotasin Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    4,777
    Location:
    Transient
    7-08 fills all those roles easily. the short action is just icing on the cake.

    as i am not a tikka fan i could very well be off base here, but i am under the impression tikka only makes long actions...? even if that is the case, the 7-08 is your front-runner and the 25-06 becomes your second, and 6.5x55 goes to third.

    good luck!
     
  4. Shawnee

    Shawnee member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2006
    Messages:
    3,306
    Location:
    Along "That Dark and Bloody River"
    Producing ammo will be somewhat more convenient and less costly for the 7mm/08.

    The short action often provides a greater choice of scopes that can be mounted on the rifle with sufficient eye relief.

    The 7mm/08 is available in the fantastic Remington Model Seven (though so is the .260 Remington which is quite close to the 6.5x55).

    The 7mm/08 can be devastating beyond it's non-magnum appearance. On the "Hunting" forum I started a thread titled "320yd. neck shot" and posted a pic of one of my sons with a Texas buck he shot a couple days ago with his 7mm/08. Check it out.

    Good Luck !
    :cool:
     
  5. woof

    woof Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2007
    Messages:
    1,571
    Location:
    central Ohio
    Seems the choice would be between the 6.5x55 and the .260 Rem, they are nearly identical ballistically. The .260 is a 6.5mm-08 you know. 7mm-08 is fine too though.
     
  6. Lone_Gunman

    Lone_Gunman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,056
    Location:
    United Socialist States of Obama
    The Tikka T3's are all long action, but for short cartridges the bolt has a pin that keeps the bolt from going all the way back, so the bolt throw is still a short throw.

    I don't know much about 7mm-08. Why would you pick it over 308? I thought 7mm-08 was originally designed to be a civilian version of 308 for use in areas where "military" cartridges were forbidden?
     
  7. bddeuce

    bddeuce Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2008
    Messages:
    13
    Location:
    Northeast
    I don't own a 7mm-08, but I witnessed the largest 2008 Pennsylvania Bull Elk, just under 800lbs live, taken with a 7mm-08.
     
  8. bddeuce

    bddeuce Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2008
    Messages:
    13
    Location:
    Northeast
    I don't own a 7mm-08, but I witnessed the largest 2008 Pennsylvania Bull Elk, just under 800lbs live, taken with a 7mm-08.
     
  9. rbernie
    • Contributing Member

    rbernie Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2004
    Messages:
    20,450
    Location:
    Norra Texas
    Either will do just fine - it comes down to preference.

    I prefer the 7mm08 because I could get it in the platforms that I favor. If you can get both chamberings in an equal platform, you have a very difficult decision indeed.

    I was not aware that the T3 Lite could be had in 6.5x55...
     
  10. Barker45

    Barker45 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2007
    Messages:
    105
    Location:
    VA
    6.5 Swede CZ = Beautiful, classy, accurate!!!!
     
  11. BENELLIMONTE

    BENELLIMONTE member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2007
    Messages:
    324
    Location:
    INTERMOUNTAIN WEST
    Grey',

    I own a Remington "Guide Gun" (limited run Cabelas) in 7mm08. It is accurate & easy on my shoulder. I don't own a 6.5x55 but I have read good things about it. The 7mm-08 will be easier to find ammo for. If you are using it for deer stick with the 139 grain Hornady loading. For elk I would go with Federal 140 grain Trophy Bonded or some other premium bullet
     
  12. joeoim

    joeoim Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    157
    Location:
    Western Colorado
    7mm-08
    As Shawnee said, "Devastating round"

    Joe
     
  13. Schleprok62

    Schleprok62 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2006
    Messages:
    1,009
    Location:
    Oklahoma City, OK
    Well, according to the handy dandy Remington ballistics pages... The 7mm-08 seems to have a distinct edge over the 6.5 Swede (not dissing the 6.5 in any way). Flies faster, hits harder, drops less and is definitely more available in both factory loads and for reloading...

    I like the Nosler Ballistic Tip and Partitions personally. 120, 140 and 150 grainers in my Stevens model 200... cheers!!!

    Tom
     
  14. mr.trooper

    mr.trooper Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2005
    Messages:
    1,829
    Location:
    Midwest
    i got a soft spot for the 6.5x55
     
  15. doctorxring

    doctorxring Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2005
    Messages:
    151
    Location:
    The Republic of Texas
    .

    Mercedes or BMW ?

    6.5x55 or 7mm-08 ?


    They are both outstanding performers and both
    will do the jobs you have outlined. You could flip
    a coin and be happy with either.

    The 6.5 will have higher sectional density for a given
    bullet weight. So a little less recoil for equally performing
    loads.

    The 6.5x55 with a 125 grain Partition or 130 grain Accubond
    would be my choice. Because it is my choice. That's what
    I use in my 6.5x55's and my 260 Remington's. Many dead
    game animals later, I see no need to "upgrade".

    The 6.5x55 kills just as good as the .270 Winchester I used to
    hunt with. I'm sure the 7mm-08 would do the same.

    I use Winchester brass.

    dxr

    .
     
  16. rust collector

    rust collector Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2004
    Messages:
    1,049
    Location:
    Pierre, SD USA
    If you will compare Scandinavian 6.5 loads with US 7/08 loads, the differences will evaporate. US mfrs load military cartridges lighter due to the questionable condition of some of the old war relics.

    While I don't necessarily subscribe to all Chuck Hawks' observations, he makes a lot of sense in this passage: http://www.familyfriendsfirearms.com/forum/archive/index.php/t-46428.html

    I'm not sure a short action makes a lot of difference, and may be frustrating if you like to seat bullets out a ways. You really can't make a bad choice here. My T3 is a 308 for the sake of utility, but I enjoy my M-96 6.5 and my Rem 788 in 7/08 a whole lot.
     
  17. Greywolf

    Greywolf Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    205
    Location:
    Tampa, FL
    Well, I have a HUGE soft spot for the Tikka rifles. I have a T3 in .223 and a M695 in .30-06 - it is what I took with me to Namibia this year and it was BRUTALLY devastating on everything I hunted, and insane accurate to boot.

    But the wife needs a light rifle (T3 Lite, which run around 6.1 to 6.3 pounds) and wants it to be light recoil. Hence the choice between the two cartridges. I don't own any 6.5 or 7mm rifles, but am considering getting a 6.5 Grendel upper for my AR - which I suppose would mean that if I got the 6.5 Swede I'd be able to use the same bullets for both.

    Of course, if I found a great deal, I could get both - LOL!
     
  18. rbernie
    • Contributing Member

    rbernie Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2004
    Messages:
    20,450
    Location:
    Norra Texas
    Don't laugh; I jumped on the 6.8SPC bandwagon for my hunting ARs in part because I could share bullets between it and my 270s. :)
     
  19. DeathByCactus

    DeathByCactus Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Messages:
    244
    I'd also throw my vote in for the 6.8 SPC. Good cartridge and versatility. It is my new hunting rifle / all purpose rifle.

    You can't go wrong with the 7mm either. My brother has a Remington 7mm, I have a Browning 7mm magnum. Mine kicks less then the 7mm but only because the Browning comes with a massive muzzle break. My bro has made some amazing shots, including a 387 yard shot on a jumping antelope, mid air in full sprint from the back of a truck. There is a special place in my heart for the 7mm.
     
  20. Funderb

    Funderb Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Messages:
    2,104
    Location:
    Jacksonville, Bold new city of the south.
    i vote the most cost efficient.
    plus short action
    plus...

    bigger round?

    I'd go with the one you can keep shooting.
     
  21. moosehunt

    moosehunt Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2008
    Messages:
    893
    6.55x55 is THE BEST caliber/cartridge combination I have ever found for North Amercan hunting, bar none (excepting dangerouse game, of course). I've pretty well tried 'em all, like most of 'em, but the 6.5x55 is the cats meowe! I spend huge $$ hunting sheep, and the 6.5x55 is what I take on $20,000 hunts--always.
     
  22. Shawnee

    Shawnee member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2006
    Messages:
    3,306
    Location:
    Along "That Dark and Bloody River"
  23. moosehunt

    moosehunt Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2008
    Messages:
    893
    And of course the .260 Rem is almost exactly the 6.5x55--just a skosh shorter case. An excellent choice!
     
  24. Will Fennell

    Will Fennell Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    748
    Location:
    Sharon, SC USA
    Swede

    Greywolf,
    I recently got a 6.5 Swede Tikka T3 for my wife......its easy to reload, plenty powerful, easy on the shoulder. I've used Lapua and Winchester brass, both are fine, Lapua took less preparation. I'm loading her the 130 Nosler Accubond down around 2550 FPS. I have loaded it up to just under 2800 fps, but settled on the slower load for her. Its posted several 3 shot groups in the .5" range. I now want one for myself, and I've got a safe full of rifles[ Including a SAKO GREYWOLF in .260 ;) ]

    Yup, All T3's are Long action, so no advantage to the 7mm/08 in this case.

    The 7mm/08 is a great cartridge, and if you didn't reload, I would suggest it over the 6.5, because there are more factory loads availible. But since you reload, you can take advantage of the subtle differences and advantages[ for your applications] of the 6.5 Swede.

    BTW, if you think that you will need to shorten the stock for your wife, get the wood stocked version of the T3. Its still plenty light enough, and much easier to deal with when you cut it and try to install another recoil pad. If the lenght is OK, and you go with the synthetic stock[ it is a tad lighter], change out the recoil pad [ Limbsaver makes a prefit- good pad]. The factory pad has a very sharp pointed Toe, which can really poke a shooter[especially a lady shooter] in the chest if the shooter is in an slightly reclined position. My wife knows about this:rolleyes:
     
  25. Mannlicher

    Mannlicher Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    3,430
    Location:
    North Central Florida and Miami Florida
    close your eyes and pick one. They do the same thing, in the same manner.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page