piranha45 said:
Allowing citizens to open-carry basically takes away the right of law enforcement to investigate whether a person is legally carrying a firearm or not
Excuse me?!? Where does this "right" of law enforcement to investigate whether a person is legally carrying a firearm or not come from?
Let me provide an example. You are sitting in McDonald's eating lunch with two children. Do you think LEO has the "right" to come up to you, question you as to whether those children are yours or not, and produce identification for you and your kids to prove you are lawfully in possession of those kids?!? Kidnapping is a crime you know, and LEO walking into McDonald's and seeing you eating lunch with two kids has no idea whether those kids are yours or not, or whether you are a kidnapper or not.
Why are firearms any different?
Apparently, biker-gangs waltzing about with their pistols are a problem in some areas, and giving them the option of open-carry weakens law enforcement's ability to keep tabs on whether they are lawfully carrying those weapons or not.
Put yourself in the cops shoes for a moment. Which would you rather see, a "biker-gang" walking down the street with no visible weapons and have to guess if they are armed or not; or would you rather see a "biker-gang" walking down the street with pistols clearly worn out in the open in holsters on their belts? Would you rather KNOW where the guns are, or would you rather GUESS where the guns are?!?
personally it still seems like open-carry should be the proper way; it does weaken law enforcement though..
As stated above, open carry in no way weakens law enforcement, it strengthens law enforcement. A cop has no way of knowing where a gun is concealed until he finds it in a search, or it is probably too late. With open carry, the cop knows who is armed and where the gun is. If open carry is legal, such as in Washington, and a cop sees a person wearing a gun in a holster on his belt, that cop can be pretty dang certain the person carrying the gun is not a criminal because why in the world would a criminal want to carry a gun out in the open for all to see? The criminal is more than likely to hide their gun to avoid arousing suspicion.
And back to this "right" of LEO to check me out because I am wearing a gun. Ever heard of the 4th amendment to the US Constitution? The 4th amendment says that LEO has no right to "check me out" unless they have suspicion that I am committing a crime. So maybe you would like to see carrying a firearm automatically be classified as suspicious activity? Ummm.... NO THANK YOU!
In Washington state, for instance, the gun on my belt in a holster openly carried cannot be treated any differently then a cell phone on my belt in a holster. Both are equally legal to carry without a license, except in a few specifically limited areas clearly defined in state law (RCW 9.41.300). LEO has no "right" to check me out because I am carrying a firearm in a lawful manner than if I am carrying a cell phone in a lawful manner. And that does nothing to weaken LEO's ability to enforce the law.
Dreamcast270mhz said:
Open carry still gives law enforcement the right to investigate, but it makes it legal, if you own the gun you carry and such, to display it openly, something that I have littel issue with. I wish VA would allow open carry, would allow people I know to avoid being harassed by delinquents. I mean, who would approach a person carrying a shotgun with intent to hurt?
LEO's have a right to investigate CRIME, and suspicion of a CRIME being committed. They have no "right" to investigate the carrying of firearms, absent other suspicion of an actual crime being committed, unless carrying that firearm is a crime by itself. You wish VA would allow open carry? Really?!? Anybody legal to possess a firearm in Virginia is legal to open carry that firearm in Virginia with no license required including the open carrying of a handgun at age 18 and above!
http://www.opencarry.org/va.html
I don't understand why "pro-2A" and "pro-gun" people would think that carrying a firearm warrants LEO's attention in any way, let alone gives LEO the "right" to investigate the carrying of that firearm.