guntalk-
since i don't know, i'll assume you are right that it gets 25-06 velocity (i get 3400 f/s w/ 100's in mine), and it gets this velocity out of a short action... certainly is nice that it can do that in a short action, instead of the long action required by the 25-06... but, the super-short doesn't take full advantage of what is possible.
what would be the advantage of a super-short cartridge? it still gets chambered in short action rifles, thereby saving little or no weight over a short-mag. a short mag would also be chambered in a short action, but will get much more velocity. i don't see how the super-short fills any niche that wouldn't be
better filled by a short-mag... (short, super-short... are we confused yet???
) notice the proliferation of wildcat 25's that are velocity-based (like the 25-284).
perhaps barrel-life is a factor - though not many people who'd buy this cartridge are real concerned about barrel life (and is there an appreciable difference in barrel life between a wsm and a wssm?). there are people who, like me, prefer magnums because of the velocity - barrel life be damned. in that link i put up, john barseness claims that the reason for the super-short over a short had everything to do w/ money (browning wanted to get r&d costs out of the wssm), and nothing to do w/ anything else (like performance of wssm and wsm).
of course, this is just speculation coming from a rifle crank and nothing else. i still think winchester dropped the ball by offering only half a burrito, instead of a whole enchilada (25 wsm)... i think the manufacturer (rem in this case) who can give us 25-284 or 257 roy ballistics in a short action 25 cal wins this race. seeing how remington was burned so bad w/ their shamu line (coming to market late, ballistics inferior to the winchester), i guess i don't know if they'd be willing to chance a 25 shamu or not...
just to address something art said... the 300 wsm really shouldn't be compared to a 30-06 or 308. it is in a class entirely removed from those 2 - which does not negate those 2 by any stretch, it just isn't the same thing. i get 3100 f/s w/ 180 sierra gamekings in my 300 wsm - well above anything the 06 or 308 can do. it is true that the 300 whizzum won't kill a deer any deader than a 30-06 would, but the whizzum is no 30-06.
what does excite me, is that it seems i can get the wsm cartridges in a rem 700 now... available soon, anyway. that means i won't be stuck w/ winchesters when i get my next wsm... that, i lilke.