Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Woman awarded $11.3 million in online defamation case

Discussion in 'Legal' started by Bartholomew Roberts, Oct 12, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Bartholomew Roberts

    Bartholomew Roberts Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    14,613
    Location:
    Texas
    Source: http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-10-10-internet-defamation-case_x.htm

    The defendant in this case was actually a victim of Hurrican Katrina. She had hired her own lawyer but soon ran out of funds to pay the lawyer. So, she just ignored the trial dates and offered no defense. The jury awarded the plaintiff $11.3 million, most of which she will never collect; but that defendant will be in debt the rest of her natural life.

    This story also serves as a reminder why the Forum Rules at THR not only make for a nicer environment; but help protect the users from their own thoughtlessness on occasion.
     
  2. JohnBT

    JohnBT Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    13,233
    Location:
    Richmond, Virginia
    This appears to be more a case of talking bad about a business than a personal thing. Businesses can get very touchy about badmouthing and lost income.

    Nevertheless, if you tell the truth about someone you have a fighting chance. Of course, you have to show up for your court date. Duh.

    John
     
  3. MechAg94

    MechAg94 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2005
    Messages:
    4,734
    I don't have a problem with the case in general, but the circumstances are a little strange.
    Did the defendant have the real opportunity to travel to Florida to defend herself? I am assuming she was informed of the court date but they don't really say. Do you have a right to court appointed counsel in civil cases.
    The article really didn't say anything that would allow me to judge the merrits of the case anyway. $11 million is a lot for some internet posts. The article didn't really get into what was said.
     
  4. MechAg94

    MechAg94 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2005
    Messages:
    4,734
    Some might want to think about this the next time they get on this or another forum and bad mouth a gun shop. If you have to do so, make sure you stick with the facts and don't exagerate or skip over details like something you forgot to do. I have seen some rather emotional posts before that invite something like this.
     
  5. Bartholomew Roberts

    Bartholomew Roberts Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    14,613
    Location:
    Texas
    The woman acknowledged receiving the court date; but indicated she thought she didn't have to show because she lost her lawyer IIRC.
     
  6. Thin Black Line

    Thin Black Line Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2005
    Messages:
    3,213
    Location:
    Amerikan Twilight Zone
    Read the article and am not sure how this affects firearms, but I'll keep my
    finger off the "thread closed" trigger in case there's some discussion about
    how this could affect the future of this country. ;)
     
  7. carpettbaggerr

    carpettbaggerr Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2003
    Messages:
    1,676
    http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-10-10-internet-defamation-case_x.htm

    No judgement amount asked for, and the jury comes up with $11,300,000. Nice. Better than a scratch-off ticket. I really doubt the entire business brings in even a few hundred K, let alone a million/year. I have trouble believing the defamation was equal to 5 or 10 years of income.
    They make you a Moderator, TBL? Need to get your member status updated. Congratulations, I think........
     
    Last edited: Oct 13, 2006
  8. Thin Black Line

    Thin Black Line Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2005
    Messages:
    3,213
    Location:
    Amerikan Twilight Zone
    LOL, no just an inside joke for Bart. He's da man.....
     
  9. JJpdxpinkpistols

    JJpdxpinkpistols Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2005
    Messages:
    322
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    I dont' think this is done yet

    Looking at this case as the definitive case for online defamation is tantamount to looking at Miller V US as the definitive case for firearms possession.

    There are some serious issues that came up here: namely, that the defendant wasn't present, and was without counsel. This clearly demonstrates only one thing: that a lot of money will go to a plaintiff if they claim defemation without anyone there to prove or defend against such an accusation.

    I think we are better served to look at Max V. Dimeo for guidance. This was properly adjudicated with counsel with both parties present.

    Sorry, but I spend a lot of time deciding what is and is not libel on a board I own full of litigous media types.
     
  10. Wesker

    Wesker member

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2006
    Messages:
    263
    What crap. Free speech, the internet. Those two things mean I can say what I want about who I want and nobody can sue or take any 'legal' recourse.

    The plantiff is also PATHETIC and immature for pursuing a frivilous lawsuit because she got butt-hurt over what some person said about her on the inernet. Thats right SUE SCHEFF, I CALLED YOU A PATHETIC CHILD for wanting to further ruin the life of someone who already has nothing.

    I hope Sue dies in a car fire.

    Gah, since this is Florida we're talking about I'm sure the entire jury consisted of folks 65+ years who think the internet is a series of tubes. The internet is not some magical thing that will instantly cut into FOX NEWS! and display what one person says about another person. Especially since this happened on a third party website, Forntis.com. Apparently the moderation on that site isn't too good if it allowed school ground bickering and name calling to take place in a community of users whose goal is to confer about their children gone away to boarding schools. Had moderators done their jobs this most likely wouldn't have happened.

    However I'm not blaming the moderation of Forntis.com, I'm just awash with bewilderment.
     
  11. BrokenPaw

    BrokenPaw Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    413
    Location:
    Manassas, VA
    As opposed to using the Judicial System to destroy people they don't like. That's obviously ok. :banghead:

    On the other hand, the defendant in this case is not the sharpest knife in the drawer, either:

    Golly, could that be because you didn't tell your side? In court? Like you were supposed to?

    Even without a lawyer, I'd rather defend myself in against a lawsuit than just not show up and essentially hand the verdict to the plaintiff. :scrutiny:

    -BP
     
  12. Bartholomew Roberts

    Bartholomew Roberts Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    14,613
    Location:
    Texas
    I thought that the story served as a nice reminder to everyone that things you say on the Internet can have real world consequences. It probably does flirt with the line as far as being off-topic since it doesn't relate to firearms and has only a tenuous relation to civil liberties.

    It is pretty relevant to Internet discussion forums though. Imagine being in the shoes of the defendant here - she has to hire a lawyer (and in another state) to answer a claim that may not even have a solid basis in fact. All it takes is someone who is upset enough that they are willing to pay court costs and facts that might support a pleading.

    That is a novel legal interpretation of the First Amendment; but you should be aware that it is completely at odds with current law on the subject. Under current law, the right to free speech does not include freedom from civil liability if you libel, slander or defame someone.
     
  13. Jorg Nysgerrig

    Jorg Nysgerrig Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2006
    Messages:
    7,823
    What's the old saying, "Your right to swing your arms ends where my nose begins"?

    As I recall, you were the same guy that thought carrying concealed on a military installation while you delivered pizza was good idea.

    What crap, indeed.
     
  14. Autolycus

    Autolycus Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2006
    Messages:
    5,456
    Location:
    In the land of make believe.
    Interesting article. Perhaps I should check all my posts and make sure nobody can sue me?:confused:
     
  15. Malone LaVeigh

    Malone LaVeigh Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,136
    Location:
    Washed out of Four-dollar Bayou. Now I'm... somewh
    The relation to civil liberties:

    We have all of the civil liberties we can afford to pay for in this country.
     
  16. DerringerUser

    DerringerUser Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2006
    Messages:
    238
    Our free speech is being flushed down the toilet as we know it. That is really disgusting, it may even be fake, but im not making any accusations. Where are the ACLU when you need them, to defend this poor woman?

    Another Katrina victim let down by our @#%$ up legal system.
     
  17. DerringerUser

    DerringerUser Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2006
    Messages:
    238
    Agree 100%, very well said.

    People need to stop being so immature, and do something about it themselves, like confront the person, not sue them for $11 mil.
     
  18. Tommygunn

    Tommygunn Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2006
    Messages:
    4,506
    Location:
    Morgan County, Alabama
    I believe the John Peter Zenger trial established that the truth is the best defense for slander 200 years ago. But, first, what is said MUST be the truth. And, obviously, you must show up to the court to defend yourself in a civil suit. Don't, and despite the virtues of your case, and you will lose by default. That's just the way the system works.
    I'm not defending the defendant in THIS case. She may whine all she likes about not being "heard," but as an earlier poster said, that's her fault, she had her chance -- in court, where it belonged!
     
  19. the 22 junkie

    the 22 junkie Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2006
    Messages:
    267
    Location:
    Houston, TX
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page