Officers'Wife
Member
Turdy turdy? That's a new one... My grandfather always called it the Chuck Conner's tap dance.Gotta love the "Turdy - Turdy!"
Turdy turdy? That's a new one... My grandfather always called it the Chuck Conner's tap dance.Gotta love the "Turdy - Turdy!"
Didn't vote because honestly it wouldn't matter all that much to me. I could get by with a lever or bolt gun as good as a auto.
I hate this question because of the amount of variables. So I voted all other. I think in a survival/worst case/gotta have meat scenario, I want the least amount of moving parts possible. KISS. I'm also assuming that we wouldn't be able to just hop online and order some new parts next day aired to our shanty in the deep woods. I'm thinking a break over with iron sights in 243 or 7mm-08. But also, how available is ammo for this question? That dictates my caliber choice.
I'm perfectly capable of running any of the three.Would you choose a lever? Or would you choose a bolt? Or would you choose a semi auto?
Bolt action 30-06. It does everything.
30-06 for home defense? Completely worthless, just ask any veteran of WWI, WWII or Korea.Nothing does everything.
Not well or kinda-well, anyway.
I don't think I'd reach for a bolt action .30-06 as my home defense gun, for example. I don't think I'd use it for a defensive carbine/pistol match either.
30-06 for home defense? Completely worthless, just ask any veteran of WWI, WWII or Korea.
Which bolt action .30-06 did they opt for in houses?
Refresh my memory.
Additionally, this isn't the 1920's. We have more and better options now than we did 90 years ago.
The 30-06 is as good or better home defense round than the .223 is a hunting round.
Since they make bolts and autos in both calibers, that really has nothing to do with the OP's question.Well, if the rule is one rifle, then I'd rather settle on a 30-06 for home defense than a 5.56 for moose and bear.