Would an AR be your only rifle? (what rifle type would an only rifle be?)

One rifle...it would be:


  • Total voters
    217
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
If I could only own 1 gun, it would be a German K98 with a pile of ammo. There is literally nothing you cannot do with it (that guns are used for) and it will work in the worst environments on this planet. Need to hunt small game such as squirrels? Make traps.
If I were going with a bolt gun, the K98 would be it. Pop has one passed down from his pop that's still got all the Nazi proof marks on it, stamped "1938." It functions flawlessly. It's laser-accurate and would probably shoot out to 500 or even 1000 yards no problem if we set it up right. (The original ironsights it had were incremented to 2000 meters.)

However, it was rough. The steel-backed stock was merciless under the recoil of the 8mm mauser, so it was not fun to play with and I stopped asking to borrow it xD.
 
Uncle Sam lent me an AR many years ago. I got that out of my system.

Bolt action for me (though I'd keep my BLR in .308 for hunting as well).
 
- under pressure people have more malfunctions with bolt guns than they do with autoloaders.
+1
This is why I prefer semis to pump shotguns for everything shotgun (hunting, defense, clays). Handguns too. Almost all of my guns are semi auto these days.
 
After many years of owning lots of firearms of different flavors, then fine-tuning my interests to military pattern guns, the main factors in play are...

1) Commonality- Parts, mags, gear, support...when considering the ubiquity of 5.56/.223 in Military, Law Enforcement and Civilian arenas, one would be silly not to consider an AR15 from this standpoint alone. If the answer to this question was something else, then it would drastically change the rest of the considerations below.

2) Sustainability- Due to the aforementioned commonality, the long term sustainability of any gun should be a strong consideration. Here in the USA, if we assume the 5.56/.223 caliber as being the most common rifle caliber, then the AR15 follows as the most common rifle/carbine from which to launch it. You want to be able to have a chance at being able to easily replace any parts when the need arises.

3) Reliability- Assuming the previously mentioned AR15, it's there. Having been shooting since before these forums came about, I can tell you that there is overwhelming evidence that beat-up or homemade (Bubba) AR15s account for the vast majority of reliability complaints. Lots of other firearms are very reliable, but they fall short of the commonality and sustainability needs as previously mentioned.

4) Accuracy- In the case of the 5.56/.223 semi-autos, the AR has earned it reputation for accuracy. The real world results of shooters presenting real data are quite revealing. When a higher degree of accuracy is needed, there exists an array of components to meet/exceed that need. Not much more needs to be said in that regard.

5) Modularity- If you're gonna have one gun, it should be customizable to your liking. Aside from the typical THR haters, most everyone can make an AR into something that appeals to their needs or aesthetic sensibilities. Unless of course they simply hate anything with a pistol grip and removable mag. We've come to call them Fudds.

6) Weight- If you're gonna have one long gun for everything, then weight needs to be a consideration for any able-bodied shooter. For many years I've seen people lambast others for making weight considerations. More often than not, these are the people who only carry their gun from the car to the firing line. How many of them can even jog a mile? We're talking one rifle for everything, right? Things that make you go hmmmm.
__________________________________

I've noticed that most people who would thump their chest and vehemently dismiss the AR haven't run a properly built gun, with proper lubrication, through its paces to even attempt to get an objective baseline. Let's just say there's a good reason why nothing else has displaced it for general issue.
 
Bumping this thread just a little, but I'd gladly have a good 308AR for my only rifle. But it would have to be from KAC or LMT.

Semiauto, large capacity, good accuracy, and intermediate caliber. I don't think you can go wrong with an AR10, even for hunting. If Military snipers use it, why can't you use the same for hunting?
 
For me, it would be a Swiss K31.
I like it and I am comfortable around it. Not the most practical, but if only one, conditions not implied.
Honorable mention:
Ernst Stiegleder Guild Sporting Mauser
Swedish 1896 Mauser
Schmidt Rubin 1911
 
After many years of owning lots of firearms of different flavors, then fine-tuning my interests to military pattern guns, the main factors in play are...

1) Commonality- Parts, mags, gear, support...when considering the ubiquity of 5.56/.223 in Military, Law Enforcement and Civilian arenas, one would be silly not to consider an AR15 from this standpoint alone. If the answer to this question was something else, then it would drastically change the rest of the considerations below.

2) Sustainability- Due to the aforementioned commonality, the long term sustainability of any gun should be a strong consideration. Here in the USA, if we assume the 5.56/.223 caliber as being the most common rifle caliber, then the AR15 follows as the most common rifle/carbine from which to launch it. You want to be able to have a chance at being able to easily replace any parts when the need arises.

3) Reliability- Assuming the previously mentioned AR15, it's there. Having been shooting since before these forums came about, I can tell you that there is overwhelming evidence that beat-up or homemade (Bubba) AR15s account for the vast majority of reliability complaints. Lots of other firearms are very reliable, but they fall short of the commonality and sustainability needs as previously mentioned.

4) Accuracy- In the case of the 5.56/.223 semi-autos, the AR has earned it reputation for accuracy. The real world results of shooters presenting real data are quite revealing. When a higher degree of accuracy is needed, there exists an array of components to meet/exceed that need. Not much more needs to be said in that regard.

5) Modularity- If you're gonna have one gun, it should be customizable to your liking. Aside from the typical THR haters, most everyone can make an AR into something that appeals to their needs or aesthetic sensibilities. Unless of course they simply hate anything with a pistol grip and removable mag. We've come to call them Fudds.

6) Weight- If you're gonna have one long gun for everything, then weight needs to be a consideration for any able-bodied shooter. For many years I've seen people lambast others for making weight considerations. More often than not, these are the people who only carry their gun from the car to the firing line. How many of them can even jog a mile? We're talking one rifle for everything, right? Things that make you go hmmmm.
__________________________________

I've noticed that most people who would thump their chest and vehemently dismiss the AR haven't run a properly built gun, with proper lubrication, through its paces to even attempt to get an objective baseline. Let's just say there's a good reason why nothing else has displaced it for general issue.
For the same reasons you site it would have to be an AR, or something along those lines. The AR is not a rifle in my personal top 10, but if the zombies come it would be the one I would take for all the reasons you say. For the hand gun it would be a 92FS or a 1911 of some kind...same reasons.
 
No way would any kind of Military rifle be my only rifle - all you guys will eat up the ammo at the drop of a hat every time a politician goes "bump".

Make my rifle some kind of .270 hunting rifle. You guys never managed to get to the stocks of that in either of the last 3 or 4 panics.

Give me a Remington 7600 carbine, or a Browning BLR 81 - No, the mag caps aren't very high, but they offer 4 fast follow up shots with a very potent and multi-capable cartridge that wont dissapear at the drop of a hat.
 
Quality ak from arsenal! Will always go bang!!:beer::D

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
 
While my favorites are my SiG-55x's, I voted AR because of multiple uppers ... and while the .223/5.56 is my favorite cartridge, one calibur can't be all things or fit all purposes
 
No way would any kind of Military rifle be my only rifle - all you guys will eat up the ammo at the drop of a hat every time a politician goes "bump".

Make my rifle some kind of .270 hunting rifle. You guys never managed to get to the stocks of that in either of the last 3 or 4 panics.

Give me a Remington 7600 carbine, or a Browning BLR 81 - No, the mag caps aren't very high, but they offer 4 fast follow up shots with a very potent and multi-capable cartridge that wont dissapear at the drop of a hat.

Would you mind telling us what, quantitatively, differentiates a "military rifle" from a "hunting rifle"?

Keep in mind we are talking generally-legal, non-NFA firearms that are available on the commercial market to regular-Joe private citizens.

Also, if you don't mind answering (don't blame you if you don't...), how many rounds of .270 do you currently possess?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top