Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

YAY! A Caliber war...sort of. Not really.

Discussion in 'Handguns: General Discussion' started by Amadeus, Aug 16, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Amadeus

    Amadeus Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    638
    Location:
    America
    Back in the early to mid 1990s I remember frequently reading gun rags in which the .357 125 grain JHP was regularly declared to be the top fight stopper among handguns. No comparison was really made to the .45. Though that caliber was never questioned either. But there seemed to be a sense of awe among the gun writers when writing about the 125 grainer.

    Yet today, the gun boards are strewn with people who declare that they would not look at, carry or even throw a gun in the toilet unless it's chambered in something beginning with a .4-. So what happened to my beloved .357, 125gr JHP? Can it still stop an assailant with one hit to center mass? Has it been forgotten? Did we decide it's no longer as effective when compared to the .40? Was it just shelved in favor of the high-cap .40/.357sig? Has .45 just gotten better? Or is the .357 125 grain JHP still out there, quietly and confidently pulling duty as the venerable defensive round touted so wildly in all those Peterson publications?
     
  2. TnShooter83

    TnShooter83 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2007
    Messages:
    172
    Nope it's still up there in the top.
    But it's also one of the largest lengthwise.

    Most people I know prefer the .357 for home defence.
    But for carry it is just BIG.
     
  3. ugaarguy

    ugaarguy Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2006
    Messages:
    12,013
    Can it? Sure. So can a 22 LR center mass that happens to find an artery.

    Will it? Who knows. Too many variables to deal with. Never count on one shot to stop a fight. Be ready to keep pulling the trigger until agression ceases. Keep in mind that handguns are for portability. They are marginal at best when compared to rifles & shotguns - and even long guns can, and have, failed to stop agression with but one shot.
     
  4. mjrodney

    mjrodney Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Messages:
    434
    Location:
    SW Florida
    It likely has less to do with the caliber than it does with the firearm it's used in.

    These days the pistol is more prevalent than the revolver, so the discussions on caliber tend to move to the pistol calibers (i.e., 9mm versus .40S&W versus .45ACP versus 10mm).

    The .357mag hasn't lost any power over the years, but the number of folks who rely on it are fewer today.
     
  5. the pistolero

    the pistolero Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2006
    Messages:
    783
    Location:
    Beaumont-Port Arthur, Texas
    I don't see why the .357 Magnum would have lost any of its effectiveness. If I had to guess why fewer people seem to be raving about the .357, it would be the capacity issue. But I would definitely not feel undergunned with six rounds of it, although a Glock 20 with 15+1 rounds of 10mm would be just dandy...
     
  6. mavracer

    mavracer Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2007
    Messages:
    4,395
    Location:
    wichita
    are you crazy, you can't hit a BG with less than 6 rounds ya gotta have 15.
    SPRAY AND PRAY.you know.

    ok sarcasim off. yes its still the same viable caliber it always has been,maybe even better with new bullet tech. that allows simalar performance with reduced recoil( golden saber/gold dot ).many of us even feal ok carring a 5 shot 357
     
  7. Papaster

    Papaster Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2007
    Messages:
    172
    Location:
    The Great Republic of Texas
    Yup. More of a wheel gun vs. auto question here. Look back in that era, and you'll find most the discussion between guns was "Colt or S&W?" not "Glock or H&K/Sig/SA?" This is just an semi-auto culture now. Yes, they had the venerable Colt 1911 available to them, but most didn't yet carry one. And you'll still find a remnant (perhaps even a resurgence?) of those carrying revolvers for SD. My father-in-law carries a 7 rnd .357 mag and swears by it. It's his first choice. Second to this is his .45 ACP Kimber or his .40 Glock. .357 has all the power it always has, just not a competitive platform from which to fly, as it once did.
     
  8. Noxx

    Noxx Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2007
    Messages:
    1,374
    Location:
    SoCal
    The .357 is great, and it's still my nightstand gun. I think TN pegged it, it's a long round, in a big lumpy package. Around the house it's not an issue, but IWB the autos have a big edge.
     
  9. DawgFvr

    DawgFvr Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    1,063
    Location:
    Olympia, WA
    Interesting...I do it opposite. I cannot even imagine firing a .357 inside my home...my eardrums deserve better and the flash would be a bit much. Nope...I keep my 10 + 1 .45 ACP on the night stand at home. I carry revolvers when I'm out and about...
     
  10. TimboKhan

    TimboKhan Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2005
    Messages:
    8,084
    Location:
    Greeley, CO
    I actually don't know what the decibel max for both (or for that matter, either) cartridge is, but it seems to me like this is splitting hairs. Of course, I am not implying that you are making a mistake by going with the .45 because it is obviously an excellent choice, as much as to say that if the only reason you are doing so is noise and flash, it seems like that might be a pretty thin reason. In any case, I have either a .45 OR a .357 next to my bed, so I don't really have a dog in this fight.
     
  11. JackCrow

    JackCrow Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2007
    Messages:
    199
    Location:
    Tucson, AZ.
    I'm a big fan of .357 and yes the 125gr. is alive and well. Personally I don't like it as much as 158gr because it seems (through my guns at least) that the 125gr recoils more, I don't know why. Furthermore, I find that the 158gr tends to shoot more accurately for me.

    I also agree that the seemingly lessened coverage of the various .357 rounds are due to the gun culture being more semi-auto focused.

    As to the decibel question, I have a kinda funny story about that. A friend and I went shooting at an indoor range. I took my M-19 because I hadn't fired it in awhile and I had some rather hot reloads. All up and down the lane people were shooting 9mm semiautos almost exclusively. I rolled my target down the range, loaded up the Smith and fired, compared to the pop of the 9s it sounded like a howitzer! Everyone leaned back out of their stalls and looked at me, it was like something out of a comicbook! :D

    Some of the folks drifted down to talk to me and I let some take a turn with it. We were all laughing and joking about it and had a great time.

    So yeah, I think you may find the .357 is gonna "speak" pretty loud, especially in an enclosed space! :what:
     
  12. 40SW

    40SW Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2007
    Messages:
    405
    Location:
    New Port Richey, Florida. United States of Americ
    Aaaaaaaaaaah!!!!, stopping power threads are fun, NOW!!, According to Marshall and Sannow, it has been reported, OH!!!, Had you there for a second!!:neener::neener::neener::), now we will not be measuring fuller indices today or shooting at dead cows, but I will be honored to solve the stopping power debate once and for all.

    Simple formula.:
    (any round greater or equal to .380ACP)+(center mass hit)+(your shot hits first)= you win.

    Any questions.
    but seriously, when you deal with cartridges like the 9x19, .40SW, .45ACP, .357 MAG, .357SIG, etc, with the proper load and bullet, a center mass hit is going to end the fight, IN MOST CASES, obviously there are so many variables to say it with certainty, but in most cases, its true.
     
  13. lance22

    lance22 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2005
    Messages:
    626
    Location:
    Minn Uh So Tah
    IDIOTS! Only the .88 magnum 'll stop em cold! If it even whizzes by them they become instantly vaporized by the ripping vacuum of that massive load - in front it's like a bulldozer and behind it it's like a star imploding on itself. If they take a center of mass hit the kinetic energy sends a shockwave through their body so massive that the ensuing explosion will scatter their debris over an area of 27 square miles. The perp's head will shoot up so fast that it'll go into orbit.

    I called BearClaw Holsters, Bullman, and Mitch Rosen saying that I wanted a holster for my .88 magnum but those [deleted] hung up on me. They're not man enough I guess. The guy at Gander Mountain told me he's heard of it but they don't have them in stock. He even spent some time helping me look for it in the Uncle Mike section.

    Listen to an expert describe the .88 magnum.
     
    Last edited: Aug 17, 2007
  14. Amadeus

    Amadeus Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    638
    Location:
    America
    Don't mock the mighty double 8. I carried an .88magnum for a while. It concealed great under a Hawaiian shirt, two sweaters, and a down parka. I had to switch something smaller though because the 88 was setting off metal detectors....... across the street.
     
  15. BADUNAME2

    BADUNAME2 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2003
    Messages:
    1,262
    Location:
    Alger, OH
    .88 Magnum? For some reason this reminds me of Wile E. Coyote dropping a piano on the Roadrunner. Maybe it the association of .88 with 88 keys. But at any rate, if you can't find the vaunted .88 Mag, maybe you could CCW a piano. That's a weapon that takes a real man to use. It's even featured in the media, just think, you too could use the weapon of choice of cultural heroes like Liberace, and Elton John.

    Ok, now that that's over, we can get back to the essential debate of big and slow vs. small and fast. With that in mind, which do you think would produce a better one-hit stop? A 125 grain bullet traveling about 1500 fps? Or the aforementioned 7,563,150 grain piano accelerating at 32 fps/s? Then there's also the question of capacity. As long as we're talking handguns, and not rifles or pianos, there isn't a lot of shock taking place. We're just making holes for goblins to bleed out of. The more rounds you can carry, the more holes you can make. Consider 5 or 6 holes, vs. say 20 holes, with a CZ SP-01.

    ~~~Mat :evil:
     
  16. Amadeus

    Amadeus Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    638
    Location:
    America
    Could you be flinching when shooting the hotter recoiling 125 grainer?
     
  17. littlegator

    littlegator Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2007
    Messages:
    508
    Location:
    Vegas
    Thanks lance22, that was hilarious. Like the part about them hanging up on you. By analogy, I stopped trying to force my .50 BMG into my nightstand to protect the family and just got a German Shepherd to sit in there instead. Yep, she's a good dog. I used to put an Austrailian Shepherd in there, but I wanted more stopping power. Once you get used to the greater kick and the louder bark, you are fine.

    Seriously, sounds like a revolver/pistol issue, wherein tupperware seems to be getting the most news these days.
     
  18. Amadeus

    Amadeus Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    638
    Location:
    America
    So ... it seems that the consensus is that the 125 grain JHP .357 has not lost any of its effectiveness, just some sex appeal what with all those integral-light rail, plastic and aluminum rackin-bangers eating up fancy new catridges.
     
  19. BADUNAME2

    BADUNAME2 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2003
    Messages:
    1,262
    Location:
    Alger, OH
    Fancy new cartridges? FANCY NEW CARTRIDGES? Just a minor point of order, here, but .32 ACP, .380 ACP, 9x19MM, .38 Super, and .45 ACP are ALL older than the .357 Magnum. The only new cartridges I can think of that have made much of a splash are the 10MM and .40 SW.

    Fancy new cartridges, indeed. Hmph.

    ~~~Mat
     
  20. mljdeckard

    mljdeckard Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2006
    Messages:
    12,705
    Location:
    In a part of Utah that resembles Tattooine.
    Guilty.

    I have had two friends acquire gorgeous 4 and 6" K-frames, and they are a DREAM to shoot, bone stock. Full-house, .38s, no problem.

    But if you as me, or them, for that matter, "Ok, it's a great-shooting gun, fantastically accurate, probably the perfect man-stopper, why isn't it your CARRY gun?" we would all respond that while we love it, we don't have the time, patience, or ammo budget to REALLY learn to use it correctly. I'm already very proficient with my 1911, I don't want to stop at zero and start all over again with a bobbed .357, learning to rapid-fire it. Or, I would like to, but I'll do it after I can break 100 clay birds in a row, put 100 .22s through a quarter at 100 meters, and do an el-presidente in ...well..., faster than I can do it now. I suppose Todd Jarrett makes it look sexier than Jerry Miculek.

    But at the same time, I extend greater respect to the man who carries a 5-shot .357, because it's much more likely that he knows how to use it.
     
  21. BADUNAME2

    BADUNAME2 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2003
    Messages:
    1,262
    Location:
    Alger, OH
    Umm, why's that? .357 snubbies are among the hardest guns out there to shoot well. Especially the new lightweight versions. Most people class them as "carry a lot, shoot a little," guns. Seems to me that it's much less likely that he knows how to use it, not more. Besides, there's no venue I know of where people can compete with them. Most people think they know how to use a gun, until they enter their first match. Competition sharpens gunhandling skills like nothing else I know. (usual caveat, go elswhere for tactics.)

    It seems to me that the guy who goes to the trouble of hiding a big ol' honkin' Government Model, because that's what he shoots in matches on the weekend is a lot more likely to know how to use it than the guy with the "carry a lot, shoot a little," j-frame in his pocket.

    YMMV,
    ~~~Mat
     
  22. jbauch357

    jbauch357 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2007
    Messages:
    437
    Location:
    7th layer of hell (Seattle), Washington
    Long time .357 mag fan here, and until a week ago my carry pistol was a 2 1/4" SP101 .357 mag. Like has been stated many times - it wasn't exactly an easy pistol to shoot accurately and punished the hands during practice.

    I converted over to a G26 and am very happy with the decision. I now have twice the quantity of ammo, the pistol is more comfortable to carry and is easier to conceal. Also with double-tap ammo in it I'm pushing 1400fps with a 125gr gold-dot, so I'm not worried about running a "weak" 9mm round...



    Of course I still carry my GP100 .357 mag with 200gr hard cast rounds while in the woods. It's hard to beat the punch/penetration of a hot loaded .357 when you are up against large animals...
     
  23. Geno
    • Contributing Member

    Geno Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,984
    Autoloaders and big mags are all the vogue. The .357 Mag fits neither.

    Frankly, I would be no more scared looking down the barrel of a .357 Mag, than a .40 S&W or .45 ACP, nor any less scared by looking down the barrel of a Mark II in .22LR. Guns don't kill, but fools putting bullets into someone's body does! Center of mass doesn't even make a reliable stop. Many people die not of shooting but of shock. To that end, even a plastic (fake) gun can kill if a person believes that they have been shot and that they should die.

    If you think I am being a smart posterior, enroll in an Advanced Tactical Shooting course and read the research. So, if a .22LR will kill, how much less lethal might be the .357 Mag.

    It is nothing more than affinity. Contemporary affinity goes to autoloaders with big mags.
     
  24. Amadeus

    Amadeus Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    638
    Location:
    America
    You're forgetting the .45GAP and .357SIG.
     
  25. 2TransAms

    2TransAms Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2006
    Messages:
    814
    Location:
    Illinois,by St. Louis MO
    For better or worse,light and handy is the way to go now. Higher capacity and smaller rounds is the order of the day. Most people will opt for 15+1 of 9mm rather than 7+1 of .45 or six rounds of .357. The same thing has happened in rifle calibers,with any and all AR rifles and clones in 5.56x45 being the hot items right now.

    I'm not saying if it's good or bad,I'm just saying that's the way it is. Capacity is king,and (fun science fact!) you get the most capacity with smaller rounds.


    2TA(who has a Kimber TLE and a S&W 19 by the bed)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page