Your Taurus EDC Revolver-?

I would love to have one of the big bore Ti Ultra Lites they made years ago but haven't been able to find one. Wish they would make another batch of them :) . Not picky, 45LC, 44SPC, or 41Mag could all work for me.

Currently I have one of their newer 327 like Tallball but haven't worked it into my rotation. All steel so heavy, but I do like the 32 caliber rounds.
 
I'd want to know about how many rounds had been fired (durability)...
For example:
It has been good for 8 years and 100 rounds.
It has been good for 8 years and 1,000 ---> ?,???+ rounds.
Thank you for your response
Great question
The math is an estimation - I go to the range once a month
………… I practice - low estimate- every other month
…………. ammo quantity is 50 rounds
…………:(6 x 50) x 8 =2,400
Estimation of 1800 - 2000 is fair
Cleaning and very basic maintenance after each range time
————-My 605 poly is a workhorse
 
Thank you for your response
Great question
The math is an estimation - I go to the range once a month
………… I practice - low estimate- every other month
…………. ammo quantity is 50 rounds
…………:(6 x 50) x 8 =2,400
Estimation of 1800 - 2000 is fair
Cleaning and very basic maintenance after each range time
————-My 605 poly is a workhorse
Why not just get the stainless version of the 605? You mentioned that you have health issues, so you're sensitive to recoil. The little bit of extra weight of a stainless steel 605 loaded with 38 special will make it a little softer shooting than a 856. If you are Okay with 3" barrel, the Taurus 605 Defenders ship with Hogue rubber, Altamont wood, or VZ G10 grips along with night sights from the factory in various finishes at an affordable price.
 
@Ed Bulldog
To clarify, I thought that round count could be information you might want included in the replies.

For example, neither of these are carried but if they were:
We have a Taurus snub revolver that has been problem free for years... (That is true, we inherited it when my wife's mom died and I doubt it has had two cylinders of ammo fired through it and we have not shot it since we got it; but, my statement that is has been problem free for years is accurate, though important detail of extremely low round count was missing).
We have a Charter Arms snub that we owned for 36 years and it has been trouble free... (Also true, I bought it for my wife before we got married, she put maybe a box or two of ammo through it and it has not been shot in over 20 years. Me saying it is trouble free is more informative if one knows it has only been shot 100 times).

My prior post was not a question rather a suggestion.
 
@Ed Bulldog
To clarify, I thought that round count could be information you might want included in the replies.

For example, neither of these are carried but if they were:
We have a Taurus snub revolver that has been problem free for years... (That is true, we inherited it when my wife's mom died and I doubt it has had two cylinders of ammo fired through it and we have not shot it since we got it; but, my statement that is has been problem free for years is accurate, though important detail of extremely low round count was missing).
We have a Charter Arms snub that we owned for 36 years and it has been trouble free... (Also true, I bought it for my wife before we got married, she put maybe a box or two of ammo through it and it has not been shot in over 20 years. Me saying it is trouble free is more informative if one knows it has only been shot 100 times).

My prior post was not a question rather a suggestion.
You make a good point. I know of a lot of casual and long time gun owners who make that "problem free" of claim with various firearms that they owned for years, but haven't shot much. It seems that the OP actually shoots his carry gun. I'd say that a revolver that has gone approximately 2k +/- rounds without issue is trust worthy for carry.

When buying a new gun, I really don't care how well my previous experience was with my prior examples. Just because my anecdotal prior experience was favorable doesn't mean my future example will be problem free. I need to put decent amount of shots down range with each gun I carry before I fully trust it, and I don't care whether it's a budget brand or not.
 
@Ed Bulldog
To clarify, I thought that round count could be information you might want included in the replies.

For example, neither of these are carried but if they were:
We have a Taurus snub revolver that has been problem free for years... (That is true, we inherited it when my wife's mom died and I doubt it has had two cylinders of ammo fired through it and we have not shot it since we got it; but, my statement that is has been problem free for years is accurate, though important detail of extremely low round count was missing).
We have a Charter Arms snub that we owned for 36 years and it has been trouble free... (Also true, I bought it for my wife before we got married, she put maybe a box or two of ammo through it and it has not been shot in over 20 years. Me saying it is trouble free is more informative if one knows it has only been shot 100 times).

My prior post was not a question rather a suggestion.
Thank you
No problem
I interpreted your message as an inquiry of durability
I have the same question on many firearms
Thank you again
 
My one and only Taurus is a M431, blued 3" .44 Spl 5-round revolver.
I bought it used, probably 25 years ago. Think I paid $230 for it.
At that time, I owned one each S&W M696 and M396 (both .44 Spls).
I sold both of the S&Ws and kept the Taurus, and 25 years later, I still have the Taurus M431.

I am a confirmed S&W fan, but that Taurus will remain in my safe.
 
Not currently carrying any Taurus revolvers, but out of all they currently make it would have to be the .327. Out of all the revolvers Taurus has made, I'd really like to get my hands on one of their Titanium .45's.

That's kind of the issue with Taurus currently in that their small frame carry revolvers are a little too bare bones in that they've got sights you can't change and I don't like gutter rear sights as they're tough to see in low light and force me to raise my hand higher than I feel comfortable to get the proper sight picture. A replaceable front sight I prefer for a Tritium sight or a Tru-Glo fiber optic+Tritium.

The price is right for Taurus and for even $80 more to get the sights I want, I would pay it. Taurus has done well recently with upping their QC and customer service, but they can offer more with their revolvers.

Beyond that, what would interest me for an EDC is if Taurus took the .380 revolver and made it for .32 ACP with a spare 32 S&W Long wadcutter cylinder.
 
I used a Taurus 450 titanium in 45lC for a few yeas before we retired it as a bedroom gun.

Lightweight, under 20 ounces, almost no recoil. What a big caliber boomer it is. You have to buy one on Gunbroker, they run between $550 to $850 at auction, the stainless steel version is a little cheaper. It is such a fun little hand cannon.
 
I no longer have a Taurus EDC (or nearly EDC) revolver because I no longer carry revolvers other than a 5 shot 442 as a coat pocket gun (and it may be replaced by a 6 shot 432) or an occasional magnum revolver. Until October, when an incident made me rethink carrying only 6 rounds of .38spl, my Taurus 856 Defender was a nearly EDC gun (it split time with my SIG P365s, with the Taurus seeing more time than both of my P365s combined because I love revolvers).

Overall, I've had mostly positive experience with Taurus revolvers. My first handgun was a Taurus 82 I bought 25 or 26 years ago (I sold it because I didn't plan to own many guns at first, and I had bought a .357mag medium framed revolver and didn't see having both). A couple years later I followed up with a 605, but magnum rounds out of a 2" small framed snub are a bit much, and it was a couple ounces heavier than a dedicated J-frame or similar snub in .38. A couple years after selling the 605, I bought a used Taurus 85CH I still have (I plan on giving it to a buddy as a gift after he gets his CCW license later this year). I had two Rossis built after Taurus took over Rossi, one of which had issues (not a Taurus design, but an issue many Taurus revolvers had at the time, about 10 or so years ago).

Currently, in addition to the previously mentioned 856 Defender and 85CH, I have a few Taurus revolvers. I have a Taurus 856UL that was the first I bought after the two Rossis, it has been terrific. I then bought a 431, a 3" K-frame sized 5-shot .44spl I had long wanted (unfortunately, it doesn't always ignite the primers, it is only 100% reliable with one brand of ammo, and I bought it as a defense gun... I can't blame the gun though since it was 30 years old when I bought it and I have no idea what the previous owner did to it). I also have a Taurus 66 I recently bought, and it is one of the nicest revolvers I own (I have a Colt and 5 S&W revolvers currently in addition to my Taurus revolvers). The 66 gets occasional woods duty as my camping and hiking gun, it alternates with my S&W 66 (2.75") depending upon how concealable I need it to be on that particular trip.

Like any gun, there will be lemons. Like any gun, you need to test it before you rely on it. Like any major revolver maker, I do trust them enough that I have (and occasionally do) carry them, and if I still regularly carried revolvers, my 856 Defender would likely be my primary carry gun, unless I replaced it in that role with another 856 Defender... Just before the incident that soured me on .38spls with 6 or fewer rounds, I was looking for either an aluminum 856 Defender and would have already had one had they not stopped production, or an 856 Defender Executive Grade or another model with the CH (bobbed hammer, DAO- I don't remember the exact designation of the other CH model and it isn't currently in production so I can't easily find it). Though, if I did carry 6 shot .38s still, they do make the ultra-light (aluminium) Defender again. In fact, those last few sentences are my biggest gripe with Taurus... they are always introducing, discontinuing, and reintroducing models, so if they are currently making something you want, you might need to jump fast in case it isn't a particular sub-model they plan to keep around.
 
Last edited:
My experience with my Taurus 605 poly 357 has been good

For 8 years - my 605 Poly has been a workhorse.

QUESTION: 1) What is your Taurus EDC revolver-?
2) Why did you choose this revolver-?
3) Did you make any changes to your EDC Taurus Revolver-?

I am asking because- I am strongly considering another revolver purchase
SW & Rugers are nice - but the price point is just too high.
Also - my cancer medications have created recoil sensitivity- so recoil management and platform effective manipulation and effective caliber is a balancing act

Thank you
I didn't respond to all of your questions and an addition based on your situation, and my post is already long, so I figured I should probably answer this separately...

I chose my 856 Defender because I am a big fan of a 3" barrel in .38 and .357mag... enough to get much more reliable penetration and expansion out of the round than a 2" barrel, yet still quite concealable. Then the small frame of the 856 (as opposed to a K-frame S&W or 3" 82/65/66 Taurus) also makes is concealable. I'm not sure a better .38/.357mag carry revolver is currently made (and I have a 3" new model King Cobra and a 2.75" S&W 66). For niche needs when you need a magnum, it won't do, but I do have the S&W and Colt I just mentioned, a 3" S&W 65LS, and the Taurus 66 I mentioned in the previous post.

The only change was the grips. The grips on the Tungsten Cerakote 856 Defender I have are just too small to be comfortable for me, so I got more hand filling wood grips. My 85CH has several grips depending upon my concealment needs (well, they were changed based on needs when I did carry it, now it wears old Uncle Mike rubber service grips). I'm not a big fan of rubber on revolvers most of the time, so my 66 now wears wood grips as well.

In your case, I would suggest renting an 856 Defender if you can. With the extra weight from the 3" barrel, and decent grips (which I consider the standard Taurus rubber grips to be decent), recoil isn't bad. Though, depending upon how recoil sensitive you have become, it might be an issue. Someone else suggested the .327mag version which could be a good choice (if .327mag is too much, you can always carry .32H&R Mag and still have decent capability). Even though it is expensive, I'd also consider the S&W 432/632UC (I'm thinking about replacing my 442 with one of them).
 
A vetted taurus can be a decent workhorse!

I know this is the revolver forum, but a taurus pt92 nickle does nightstand duty.

Years ago- wish I still had it- one of my only guns was a blued taurus 85. Loaded with lrn or jhp, this was home defense and carry for like a decade. It was accurate two handed, right handed, left handed. It soaked recoil decently and was a great point shooter with the standard grips.

Wish I still had it. Actually had a great rich blueing. Weird to say bout taurus, but they don't make em like that anymore.

190 otd at gander mtn...used when I got it. Checked lock up. It would place lrn cheap ammo on top of each other at 10 yards.

It was a gift from my fiance in like 2004 or 5. Wish I still had it.
 
I no longer have a Taurus EDC (or nearly EDC) revolver because I no longer carry revolvers other than a 5 shot 442 as a coat pocket gun (and it may be replaced by a 6 shot 432) or an occasional magnum revolver. Until October, when an incident made me rethink carrying only 6 rounds of .38spl, my Taurus 856 Defender was a nearly EDC gun (it split time with my SIG P365s, with the Taurus seeing more time than both of my P365s combined because I love revolvers).

Usual carry is my .38 Defender. Back in in October of last year, a guy got shot on this block. 14 shots through the window. We heard it happen. "At this time, it is believed this incident was not a random act of violence and this is a fluid and active investigation. The MyLittleCity Police Department is asking anyone who may have information about this incident to contact either blah blah blah. " Elsewhere that evening a couple juveniles were arrested, with weapons.

We do not live in whitebread suburbia.

So, for a while afterwards I carried my Glock 19. A bit later I got a used Glock 27, converted it to 9mm. ( The horrors of shooting .40, even in that, are overblown, but 9 is cheaper.) And now I tend to go back and forth, on a whim, between the Defender and the G27.

next door.jpg


Like any gun, there will be lemons. Like any gun, you need to test it before you rely on it. Like any major revolver maker, I do trust them enough that I have (and occasionally do) carry them, and if I still regularly carried revolvers, my 856 Defender would likely be my primary carry gun, unless I replaced it in that role with another 856 Defender... Just before the incident that soured me on .38spls with 6 or fewer rounds, I was looking for either an aluminum 856 Defender and would have already had one had they not stopped production, or an 856 Defender Executive Grade or another model with the CH (bobbed hammer, DAO- I don't remember the exact designation of the other CH model and it isn't currently in production so I can't easily find it). Though, if I did carry 6 shot .38s still, they do make the ultra-light (aluminium) Defender again. In fact, those last few sentences are my biggest gripe with Taurus... they are always introducing, discontinuing, and reintroducing models, so if they are currently making something you want, you might need to jump fast in case it isn't a particular sub-model they plan to keep around.
 
How is the recoil-?
I don't have the polymer model, but with 200gr loads it's quite pleasant. I reload and try to avoid using lead due to how quickly the bore gets leaded, so I stick with Berry's. 250gr groups better, but has a stiff recoil. That's not to say the 200gr can't do well enough.
 
Also - my cancer medications have created recoil sensitivity- so recoil management and platform effective manipulation and effective caliber is a balancing act

Thank you


I have owned around 20 Taurus revolvers and never had any problem with any of them. Several were model 85s and I wish I still had at least one of them left. Now my carry gun is a no lock 442 loaded with WC ammo. Its light recoil. If you haven't tried 110gr bullets buy a box and give those a try. They normally have very light recoil unless they are loaded to +P pressures. A 110gr bullet loaded to around 900fps is a pussycat to shoot. I load them for my gun with Winchester Hollow Points.

I also have a 2" and 3" S&W model 30-1 in 32 long and those are really nice to shoot. I also have an airweight 431PD in 32 mag that is a super good carry gun. With full power 32 mag ammo its about like shooting the 110s in a 38 snub. I also have lead bullet loads loaded to around 950fps and those are almost as easy to shoot as the 32 longs I load.

If you look on gunbroker you can sometimes find a decent deal on older 32 long snubs if they are a little rough on the finish. You really need to reload for them if they are some of the newer versions with heat treated cylinders. My loads from a 2" barrel are getting 850fps. Thats at least one hundred FPS faster than the weak factory stuff and is safe in the modern swing out cylinder guns with a model number. But not for the old top breaks or foreign made guns.
 
This was the only 50 round box of 110gr ammo I could find on ammoseek. Most was 20-25 round Boutique ammo was collector pricing to go with it.


Frankly I would just go with the target wad cutter stuff. And not the super hot loads. The target grade has been working for decades as a snubby load. And its cheap enough to practice with. Save your brass always. Someday you may get fired of over priced factory ammo and may want to load your own.

 
For a time, I carried a Tauris 450 in 45LC.

Lightweight in titanium. Virtually no felt recoil with the porting and Judge style ribbed grip. Easier on the hand than a Taurus 850 CIA in titanium six ozs lighter.

Big boom, big flame.
 
Back
Top