Inebriated
Member
Well if you're like me, and never had a reason to shoot something with a slug, you probably assume they over-penetrate quite a bit. Right? In every thread where slugs come up, SOMEONE mentions penetration. But in TWO tnoutdoors9 videos, that seems to be... questionable?
The first video is of a Winchester 2-3/4" 1oz slug. It makes a MEAN permanent cavity, but it broke up into 3 pieces. One piece made it 12", and the other two made it 10".
The second video is of a Remington 3" 1oz slug. This one split into three pieces as well, one going 9", another going 9.5", and the last going 12.5".
Now reference the Remington 2-3/4" 00 Buck video, he got pellets going 14", 15", and 15.5" deep. And just for reference, his 9mm Gold Dot 124gr +P test sent a 124 grain projectile 13.25" and a test with a .45 ACP 230 grain HST put up 13.75" of penetration. Now, obviously this isn't actual game, and there is no bone or skin to affect the performance, but compared to all his other testing videos, 12.5" is actually quite shallow. So what do you guys think? Are these results consistent with those of real-world hunting applications? I'd really like to hear some opinions, especially those from some people who've used these type of slugs for hunting applications, and can comment on the accuracy of these two tests.
Note, I am only asking in regards to the cheaper foster slugs that are shown in the first two videos. Obviously sabot slugs and brenneke-style/hard cast slugs will perform differently.
The first video is of a Winchester 2-3/4" 1oz slug. It makes a MEAN permanent cavity, but it broke up into 3 pieces. One piece made it 12", and the other two made it 10".
The second video is of a Remington 3" 1oz slug. This one split into three pieces as well, one going 9", another going 9.5", and the last going 12.5".
Now reference the Remington 2-3/4" 00 Buck video, he got pellets going 14", 15", and 15.5" deep. And just for reference, his 9mm Gold Dot 124gr +P test sent a 124 grain projectile 13.25" and a test with a .45 ACP 230 grain HST put up 13.75" of penetration. Now, obviously this isn't actual game, and there is no bone or skin to affect the performance, but compared to all his other testing videos, 12.5" is actually quite shallow. So what do you guys think? Are these results consistent with those of real-world hunting applications? I'd really like to hear some opinions, especially those from some people who've used these type of slugs for hunting applications, and can comment on the accuracy of these two tests.
Note, I am only asking in regards to the cheaper foster slugs that are shown in the first two videos. Obviously sabot slugs and brenneke-style/hard cast slugs will perform differently.