alfon99
Member
Any suggestions? It will be for long range shooting and maybe for axis deer hunting.
From what I have read, the Hornady brass for the Creedmoor seems to suffer from undue primer pocket expansion.
How is a 260 less recoil than a 6.5creedmoor
Well, the main problem with 6.5x47 Lapua is ammo availability, and if you say it is ballistically very similar to 6.5 Creedmoor, which is easier to get, I guess 6.5 Creedmoor is the way to go.I am not certain in Uruguay the availability of ammunition and components, whether you have better access to US source components for reloading, or European sources.
I am in process of assembling the parts etc. for a 6.5x47 Lapua, whose components originate in Finland, other than the primers. As I understand it, the 6.5x47 Lapua is ballistically very similar to the 6.5 Creedmoor, which is rapidly gaining acceptance here in the western U.S. Depending on availability of ammunition and components, I would be comfortable with either of them. If they are equally available, I would choose the Lapua offering as IME, the Lapua components are of better quality than readily available U.S. offerings, and the Lapua has a small rifle primer, which should make the primer pockets more durable assuming similar, high, pressures. From what I have read, the Hornady brass for the Creedmoor seems to suffer from undue primer pocket expansion.
Else there is the 260 Remington and the 6.5 Grendel, with the latter being of very mild recoil characteristics, and based on the 7.62x39 cartridge.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Stubb
+1. Super accurate.How about 6mm BR?