Recent content by EAS2011

Everyone I ever knew that was issued both the M9 and a rifle hated carrying the pistol around. It's weighs down your trousers badly and is somewhat useless when you can just rely on your rifle.

I've shot a SA M1911 Mil Spec and a CZ 75 SP01. I like the M1911 design, but 7-8 rounds in a compact/full-size semi-auto is outdated. I think the CZ 75 is a great choice if you want the aesthetic appeal of a metal framed gun like the M1911 with the mag capacity of a modern design. I say choose...

I choose the XD .45 Compact, but sometimes I want a subcompact or compact Glock 9mm or .40 because of the 33/31 rd factory mags. I like the all dark earth colored M&Ps too, but I would never buy the standard finish because it looks beat up even as a nib gun.

I thought they quit importing the pm-5.

It doesn't have much competition. It is pretty much the only removable magazine fed "shotty" in town.

I shoot better with Critical Defense than PDX1 (Ranger Bonded). I don't like how the CD is bad with barriers though, so I would still rather just buy other hp designs instead.

The M4 (M1014) was my favorite weapon when I was USMC active. I don't think that civilians can buy the one with the retractable stock anymore though.

I wonder if he was more concerned about his injuries or the damage to that $4K rifle. :banghead:

Looks nice. I would buy a rifle, but ALL the rifles I want have to be neutered here in California. :mad:

I didn't know about Caspian. They look good enough for me, but SA dosen't make double stacks any more.

I always wanted a M1911 growing up, but now I think that their magazine capacity is to small. For example, S&W makes 8 round .357 magnum revolvers now. The average M1911 only holds 7-8 rounds which is really low for a semi auto. When someone makes a good looking double stack M1911 I'll buy it...