i've got both in the family and id' echo some of the other remarks...
reliability is not an issue...both will fire reliably forever...
but...id' go with the USPf .45 any day of the week. i like the way it feels in my hand and i perfer the action. it feels a little more solid to me and it's...
neither...
i love sigs and always have. my sig is just as accurate as my h&k's. but when i first got my sig i thought it was one of the most well-built guns i had used....then my H&K's came along and subconscously i feel like they are not as well built as i once did. just an observation... my...
once i got a few H&K USP's, Sigs just feel loose. you can hear the slide rattle when you fire it. it just seems like the tolerances aren't as small. there's no doubt about how well they shoot but they are starting to feel cheap compared to my USPs.
anyone with similar experiences?
i'm a big fan of the USPc! they can be found at pretty good prices these days. i bought my last one brand new with a stainless slide for $599!
the P2000 looks and feels great though i perfer the USPc in my hands.
the sig P239 is a VERY nice gun and definatly deserves to be mentioned with...
i stopped by my favorite gun shop last night to pick up a few recent purchases and noticed a gun i haven't seen before. it was a Beretta 89 .22lr match-style pistol. it's counter weighted and absolutly perfectly balanced. i've been really in the mood for a nice .22 pistol and this certainly...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.