Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You are using the old Black Responsive theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.
Had it done. the internal geometry of the J-frame limits what can be done. K-frames, Colts, and Timbers are better. I'm told the LCR is better.
I much prefer the Shield EZ.
I started out with a 642. I came to realize a few limitations:
The sights and trigger pull prevented me from using if effectively in defensive training drills.
Even a Bill Drill required a six shot capacity.
Our member JohnKsa ran some analyses based on assumed hit rates and assumed hits...
If you say so. That depends upon what you mean by small. Surely you are not again referring to one with a two ounce capacity.
Don't elaborate. This is going way off topic.
It should be plainly obvious that suppressing a sudden blaze--say if a log jumps out of the fireplace, or if there is a grease fire on the stove--can make escape a lot more likely. It may limit the damag,. if the fire can actually be extinguished..
That is inane. The device will be used when...
No, but we have smoke detectors; we do not use real candles; and we do keep a number of large fire extinguishers handy. I do not expect to save the house. My objective is egress and survival.
So be it.
Exactly. One needs to consider the conditional probability. That is a very basic tenet of risk management. One would not keep a 2 oz fire extinguisher in the kitchen because fires rarely occur.
One will know what is needed only when the need arises.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.