Woo Hoo!!!!
eForm 4 Individual
Submitted 3/02/23
Approved 3/14/24
On a sad note, I had a customers stamp approved in December 2022. Customer was out of town and said he would pick it up when he returned. I sent several reminder emails with responses of "I'll be by soon" in 2023. I forgot...
As far as the original question, YOU didn't read it. That was evident with your first four posts. :)
I wasn't replying in regards to the thread title, but to your response to this comment by Littlef:
You replied:
Thats just flat wrong sir. "Polling" IS ASKING A QUESTION! Whether THR has a...
Yet you continue to miss the fact that "parole" was replaced by "supervised release"......and I even spoon fed you the link.
And yes, there are Federal Probation Officers who supervise those released before their term of incarceration has ended. While the OP did say that the person in question...
But he could be under "supervised release", essentially the same thing as "parole".
Federal probation has existed since 1909, while supervised release has only existed since 1987, when it replaced federal parole as a means for imposing supervision following release from prison.
Yeah, it does...
Exactly this.
The "OUR police don't recognize federal law" only works as long as it takes for Barny Fife to enter the arrest into NCIC. If the perp was a prohibited person, and the arrest involved a firearm, then every LE agency in the country knows he violated federal law.
Silly statements...
Dude...... that's exactly what I wrote. :rofl:
No kidding? You mean Indiana does exactly what the rest of the states do? Unbelievable. We should all move to Indiana.
That's what she said.
First, states don't have the authority to enforce federal law. Never have.
Second, Indiana sure as heck will drop a dime to ATF/DEA/FBI on any felon they find with a firearm. It's leverage to get the accused to plead out to state charges.
Thirdly, believe that Indiana or any other state that has...
Federal probation has existed since 1909, while supervised release has only existed since 1987, when it replaced federal parole as a means for imposing supervision following release from prison.
Well, Can a Convicted Felon Go to a Firing Range Strictly as a Observer? No Handling or Firing is the thread title.
A flat "NO!!!" isn't the same as a "Maybe not".
And?????
I think you misunderstood the thread. OP has made it clear that the person would not handle or fire a firearm.
Going to a gun range as a spectator isn't the same as shooting or possessing a firearm. No federal law prohibits spectating.
The terms of his parole most certainly matter IF those terms say who he can associate with or where he can go.
Felons walking the aisles at a gun show is fine right up...
Careful.........there is no such thing as "Other Weapon" either in Title I (non NFA firearms) or Title II (NFA firearms).
Where many get confused is the Form 4473 refers to "Type" as well as "Category". A dealer transferring an AOW would write "AOW" on Question 4 "Type" and check "Other...
The definition of "Any Other Weapon": § 479.11 Meaning of terms.
So being covered by a blanket in the back seat isn't concealed on the person.
Taking a nap on the couch with your Mossberg and being covered by a blankie or your Snuggie......would be.:)
No. It wouldn't meet the definition of a "Short Barrelled Shotgun" because it has no shoulder stock.
It could meet the definition of an "Any Other Weapon" if concealed.
Says who?
ATF thinks so: ATF Determination letter from 2017
Not in any ATF regulation. If not defined in regulation, then the common "dictionary" definition is used.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.