Search results for query: *

i think you know the answer to that

charges were dropped 9 days later

i would suggest that you leave very early for the airport, give yourself plenty of time

I think this idea of someone who is a convicted felon on parole going to a gun range is dubious at best. i am not sure of why it is so important to do so that a person on parole would take the chance or pay the expense of getting a legal opinion, which may not be the interpretation of the law...

perhaps just having this bill apply to publicly accessible private property such as malls, stores, restaurants etc would be more likely to pass in the legislature,and to pass judicial scrutiny than having it apply to private property that is not publicly accessible such as residences, farms, etc

deleted due to error

it may well turnout that the workaround is legal, however, you will not avoid the ride in the meantime.

call smith and wesson dont email.

The last highest court doesnt strike down a law as unconstitutional, unless someone believes it is unconstitutional and challenges it in federal court, which starts the process.

21% tax sounds pretty high to me.

Styx, it isnt the Bruen decision itself that is considered a failure by those of us in new york, its the second part of your post that rankles, unwillingness to enforce and dithering.

that is exactly what the facts are. The legislation in new york was ready to go the minute the Bruen decision came down. This legislation is a response to the Bruen case decision. To this point the Bruen decision has been a big loss in gun rights in new york, and is only getting worse as now a...

you cannot allow him to have access or potential access to them. the gun would either have to be in your immediate possession or locked up in a safe or container where he doesnt have access to a key or a combination.

What is LB77?

if the state police have that on their site then you had better copy that to your cell phone or print it out. The potential twist is that there may have been a judicial decision on this law, in michigan, which is the reason why it is posted as it is on the state police site. that is why they...

do you have a source for that?

It is not true that you have no more right under Leosa than permit holders of each state. LEOSA § 926B. Carrying of concealed firearms by qualified law enforcement officers (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of the law of any State or any political subdivision thereof, an individual who...

From the supreme court today. the injunction by the second circuit of the circuit courts temporary restraining order on portions of the law remains in effect. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/22a557_0pm1.pdf

duly noted

you are absolutely correct, this is legal and i should not have posted something that is not legal precedent, or citable law or judicial decision. So give me a rip i deserve it. on the other hand almost all of this thread is just citing of opinions not of the judicial type also, but again, I was...