Search results for query: *

I would also say up front that, in my not so humble opinion, either of these two guns kick the tar out of the other compact 9s on the market that are competing with it (Beretta Nano, Ruger LC9, Sig P290, Kahr, ect.) I believe that Kahr had their product out way before the S&W and XDs. Its S&W...

Girodin, You are correct... It should have read. My CW9 has been reliable. I had a few hiccups within the break in period but since its has digested all the factories loads I've put through it and my hand loads.

I've carried my CW9 for two years now. I can't see myself ever going back to full-size carry. Pros 1. Very concealable 2. Very accurate in defense type shooting... 7 yards, 10 yards, 15 yards. 3. Comfortable to carry all day. My CW9 has been reliable since day one. I had a few...

I've installed a fiber optic front sight on several of my CZs. You just have to tap out the roll pin. I believe its left to right. Tap out the front sight. Notice that the stock front sight has a groove in it to allow the roll pin to pass under it. (I had to file a groove on the bottom of the...

CM9 will be my next handgun... The CW9 needs a little brother...

Of the three mentioned I went with the CW9. Mine has only malfunction once in 800 rounds. Because it so light and thin, I barely know its there. For everyday carry, all day long I like the CW9. 7 +1 and an extra mag is plenty for me.

I voted "all are telling the god honest truth" because you glean what you need from the posts anyway. Me, personally I only comment on guns I have shot myself.

kadet kit atop any of my three CZs. Service pistol sized fun with the economy of .22 rimfire. My favorite range .22.

My kadet kit fits all three of my CZs... 75b, 75bd and cz75 p01.

I evolved to a smaller gun, same caliber 9mm, smaller magazine, so less spare ammo. I still feel well armed.

VBVAGUY, I'm liking your opinion...:)

G19 was my first CCW handgun, then a CZ75 P01. After a few years I wanted to carry something a little less chunky. Purchased a CW9 and couldn't be happier. Can carry it all day without any discomfort. Weighs 22 ounces fully loaded. More than accurate enough at self defense distances.

:uhoh: PM9 is a higher quality piece... no contest. :uhoh: It usually does, but not always. Everything is subjective. :uhoh: Take off the laser and then sell them. Seems to me you are just bashing on the PM9. They have proven to be for many other shooters, good quality CCW tools. :uhoh...

Really? Different testers, different results... it is plausible. Mickey Fowler & Mr. Ayoob shoot thousands and thousands of rounds of year. They are proficient shooters and probably shoot many different weapons well. :) Gun tests did not bash the Rohrbaugh, they just liked the PM9...

Well, during one particular October 3-gun match in Massachusetts it rained all day long. My AR, shotgun, and pistol got thoroughly wet. There were no covered rifle racks. It was raining all day long. All my guns went bang, and were not the worst for wear at the end of the match. Me, well I was...

Put me into that exclusive company that likes the M&P trigger as is. While its not the gun I shoot best, my CZ75b is. I never felt the need to change out the trigger.

I just got 5k Tula small pistol primers. I loaded a few hundred rounds. They all went bang in my S&W 19, M&P 9mm and CZ 75 P01. My CZ75b which I have set up for competition with a 15 lb mainspring. Had numerous failures to ignite the Tulas, but they all went off when re-struck. Hope that helps...

When I got my CW9 I just wiped it down, lightly lubed it and fired away. No special prep and it has gone bang ever since.

Mayo, at the time they were within $100 U.S. of each other.

The August 2004 issue of Gun Tests has a head to head comparison of the Rohrbaugh vs. Kahr PM9. They chose the PM9. You can get a back issue and check it out. They had a few issues with the Rohrbaugh (lack of slide lock), clearing a jam being deadly slow, etc. They gave it a conditional buy...