2008 Light & Laser Invitational Champion Won By A Glock

Status
Not open for further replies.

tntwatt

Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2008
Messages
329
Location
Georgia
Haven't seen this posted so here it is: Dave Sevigney won the 1st L&L invitational.
Yes he used a Glock. As a matter of fact he used a Glock 34 that only had the springs and sights changed. As far as I could tell it was the most stock weapon used by anyone in the competition. I am amazed at this guy every single time I read about him.

Results:
1. Dave Sevigny – GLOCK – 73.75
2. Todd Jarrett – Para Ordnance – 87.17
3. Rob Leatham – Springfield – 87.78
4. Jerry Miculek – Smith & Wesson -92.62
5. Bob Vogel – GLOCK – 94.27
6. Doug Koenig – Smith & Wesson – 95.79
7. Max Michel – CZ – 96.46
8. KC Eusebio – CZ – 110.79
9. Phil Strader – Smith & Wesson – 113.24

And before you start Glock bashing, yes I am a Gock owner. But I also own FN/M&P/CZ/Beretta/1911's/Ruger/Taurus.
It just impressed me that he used a near stock weapon to win this competition by over 12 seconds.
 
To paraphrase, Glocks don't win competitions, people do...

Absolutely agreed. It just amazes me what this guy can do with $900 worth of gun and light/laser combination. Some of the other guys were shooting what had to be 5k customs.
 
I have a funny feeling he could win with just about anything. John

From his site:

"7-Time USPSA National Champion
6-Time IDPA National Champion
2-Time TSA National Champion
2-Time SCSA World IDPA Champion
2-Time Winchester World Challenge Champion
Light & Laser Invitational Champion
SCSA National Steel Master Champion
SCSA National Limited Champion
IPSC World & Pan American Production Champion


During the past 9 years of competitive pistol shooting, Dave has accumulated multiple national and world titles. His determination has transformed him into a dominant force in practical shooting competition throughout the world."
 
I'm not surprised. He's very talented and must work very hard to hone his craft.

I own three Glocks and have owned many other makes throughout the years. They are neither the junk the Glock bashers say nor the wonder weapons the fanboys get giddy over. They are, IMO, *very* competent combat pistols with way more positive attributes than negatives.

K
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top