A Tale of Two Revolvers - Part Two

Status
Not open for further replies.

pendennis

Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2011
Messages
643
A little while back, I conducted a range experiment with a pair of identical Model 19's, one Magnaported and one not. Based on firing some factory-loaded .357 Magnum rounds, I concluded that Magnaporting didn't do much of anything for a 4", .357 Magnum revolver.

Today, I'm posting the second half of the experiment.

I own two Model 29-2 revolvers, 4" barrels, nickel finish. I've owned one for several years, having bought the revolver for a good price at a local gun show. This Model 29-2 was owned by a retired police officer, and had been Magnaported (done at Magnaport). A few weeks ago, I snagged another, this one also owned by a retired police officer. It's, of course, unported, but alike in all other respects. Same target hammer and target trigger on both revolvers. Both revolvers had Hogue grips which would soak up a bit of the recoil.

Today, I decided to do a real blind test, attempting to determine if Magnaporting helped with a larger framed revolver, and chambered in a more powerful round.

I used a box of Magtech .44 Magnum, 240gr JSP, that I bought this past week. One of the guys at our club volunteered to load and hand me the revolvers in such a way that I couldn't see the ports. He loaded five rounds each time, and I fired four strings in each revolver, switching revolvers between each string.

The first string was really recoil-stiff. I hadn't fired a .44 Magnum in several months, so the recoil was really noticeable. I fired at two separate targets, and started to tell the difference after the second string of fire. At the end of the four strings in each revolver, the one used on the right-hand target definitely seemed somewhat milder. The fellow who loaded for me asked which target seemed to be mildest, and I told him the right-hand target. We examined the targets, and the right-hand target definitely had a tighter 20-shot group than the left.

My conclusion is that Magnaporting does reduce felt recoil, even with a 4" barrel. I started to feel a difference in recoil after the first two strings in each revolver, and the results showed it. .44 Magnums are not my choice of long range sessions, but it was fun to conduct a real blind test.

As with the earlier test with the Model 19's, this type of test would probably do better in a Ransom Rest, where the amount of recoil arc could be seen a bit better. But, my limited test shows that bigger calibers definitely benefit.

As always, YMMV.

The Magnaported revolver is the bottom picture.
SmithWessonModel29-21974Left.gif
SmithWessonModel29-2LFT.gif
 
Cool, thanks for the efforts.

Do you notice an increase in noise or concussion between either of them?
 
I have a SBH that I had MagNaPorted and it mturned what I call a wrist wrencher into a fairly comfortable pistol to shoot. I also have SRH 454 that's ported and glad it is. I like large bore revolvers and such but I have to say the 454 is my limit,fired a Contender in 45/70 factory barrel with a muzzle brake and 3 shots was enough fo me.
 
Mr.RevolverGuy wrote:
...Do you notice an increase in noise or concussion between either of them?
I was outside, and our wooden overhead baffles tend to absorb some of the noise, so I didn't notice it much, if at all.
 
firesky101 wrote -
Do you have a chronograph? I have always been curious if porting might reduce velocity a few fps.
Don't have a chronograph, but I've always read that it does. Gas escapes through the ports, so it seems it would.
 
pendennis

Interesting experiment! I seem to recall that I read an article years ago concerning Magnaporting and its effectiveness in reducing muzzle rise and felt recoil. I think the writer came to the conclusion that it was mainly effective when the ammunition used heavier bullets and was loaded to higher velocities.

Maybe you could try testing different loads in both .357 Mag (and .38 Special), and .44 Mag (and .44 Special), to see if this has any effect on the amount of recoil you experience. Keep up the good work and let us know if you conduct any more testing along these lines.
 
A friend and I did a similar test with 4" 629s several years ago. We made it a true blind test by closing our eyes as we were handed one of the guns. The non shooter helped the shooter line up towards the back stop, and the shooter fired 2 or 3 rounds , then traded guns. When our hands gave out from recoil, ( 4" 629s DO kick ), we realized we couldn't tell the guns apart by feel , or recoil, but the ported gun had a sharper muzzle blast, and we knew which gun we had on the 1st shot. We felt that porting would be much more effective on longer barreled guns , i.e. 5",6" or longer. We used Rem. 240 JHP.
 
I should also mention that we had fired a PPC 60 round course 2 days before with the same guns and ammo, and we might not have had full feeling restored, laugh.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top