Let me start by saying I'm a revolver moron, I'm much more familiar with autos.
Anyway, I've got this 64-5 I use as a a night stand gun (with BB's variation of the FBI load). In this role, it is excellent. I have ammo I trust to stop an invader, and the gun is well....a k frame.
Here's the problem: If I lay the palm of my hand across the top of the frame, letting my fingers and thumb cover the sides of the cylinder, and I pull the trigger, the gun fails to index/lock up. Let me clarify by saying that I do not squeeze on the sides of the cylinder, this is simply allowing the fingers to curl around as they naturally do. The same thing happens if I try to manually cock the hammer, the pawl(?) gives up on rotating the cylinder before the hammer falls. a non-locked cylinder when the hammer falls is bad for obvious reasons. It seems to me that if the weapon were caked in mud or something else, that it might have trouble firing when needed most (hence why it's a nightstand gun).
Here's my question(s): Is this normal, and am I simply expecting this piece to function under abnormal conditions? Is this indicative of a problem (worn parts), or simply the nature of the revolver? When I run the regular timing/lockup test it runs fine, locks up no matter how fast or slow I cycle the action.
I understand with the Ruger design, lockup comes sooner in the cycle than it does on a S&W. I don't really know much, it's just something I've come to read from various sources over the years. It seems to me that the cylinder should be able to achieve lockup in virtually any circumstances, hence the reputation for reliability. I'm trying to like revolvers more (auto guy), but I guess I just don't know enough yet.
Anyway, I've got this 64-5 I use as a a night stand gun (with BB's variation of the FBI load). In this role, it is excellent. I have ammo I trust to stop an invader, and the gun is well....a k frame.
Here's the problem: If I lay the palm of my hand across the top of the frame, letting my fingers and thumb cover the sides of the cylinder, and I pull the trigger, the gun fails to index/lock up. Let me clarify by saying that I do not squeeze on the sides of the cylinder, this is simply allowing the fingers to curl around as they naturally do. The same thing happens if I try to manually cock the hammer, the pawl(?) gives up on rotating the cylinder before the hammer falls. a non-locked cylinder when the hammer falls is bad for obvious reasons. It seems to me that if the weapon were caked in mud or something else, that it might have trouble firing when needed most (hence why it's a nightstand gun).
Here's my question(s): Is this normal, and am I simply expecting this piece to function under abnormal conditions? Is this indicative of a problem (worn parts), or simply the nature of the revolver? When I run the regular timing/lockup test it runs fine, locks up no matter how fast or slow I cycle the action.
I understand with the Ruger design, lockup comes sooner in the cycle than it does on a S&W. I don't really know much, it's just something I've come to read from various sources over the years. It seems to me that the cylinder should be able to achieve lockup in virtually any circumstances, hence the reputation for reliability. I'm trying to like revolvers more (auto guy), but I guess I just don't know enough yet.