STAGE 2 said: Umm.... unless things have changed, the burden is not his to prove.
The burden is roughly equivalent to one we have we asked for evidence we have a carry permit for our gun, have a sales tax certificate hanging on the wall of a retail store, or otherwise have to comply with the law.
PlayboyPenguin said: You are wrong about the knife laws in Oregon so you are going way back to when I first joined this board and selecting small clips of things I said then presenting them out of context???
Not exactly. You have in the course of less than a year completely reversed your position and attitude on concealed carry, and now expect to be taken, at your word, as an authority on the matter. Forgive me if I find your credibility lacking, but I do. I still would like to see someplace this authoritative, precise language from a statute or case that you claim is so very clear. As I said, if its widely known, why can't it be found, and why are you the only one so far who knows of it? Are you expecting all of us to rely on marketing literature you got from a manufacturer, biased to sell its goods to a customer, as your sole source? This Sheriff's office, can they cite the reference, or it is just their practice? Its a big difference. Now you're stating your attorney, real estate it was, told you only the "clip" needs be visible. I'm still suspicious of your claim.
PlayboyPenguin said: Bullfrog, are you a small child? . . . . I repeat once again (not directed at any certain person)..."sometimes the biggest threat to RKBA are the small minded and spiteful people that proclaim to love it so".
And again with the insults. Small child, and I assume small mind? If you make an insult to no particular person, but address it to the group, then in your rationale is it not really an insult?
I'm persuaded you enjoy being flamboyant, attracting attention, and starting trouble. I guess that's just your way. I enjoy debates as much as the next guy, but I don't get personal with them When you take it there so quickly, as you often do, it bothers me. You insulted this community - meaning gun owners in general and us in specific - when I first saw you arrive. You are still doing it. You may have changed your mind regards to walking about society personally armed, but you haven't changed how you think about us "small minded joe smoes".
Honestly, I think its a wonderful, great sign of maturity and growth to see one persuaded about such a personal, grave matter. And I'm pleased to see you enjoying the rights some of us have exercised for decades. However, I bristle at your attitude about how you make claims with "obvious evidence" then decide its for us to disprove them. You are a product of higher education. Is that the form of dissertation you were permitted?
I'm sorry to have highjacked the topic, all. I'm sure this is about 3 posts from being locked by now, and I know a few of you would have liked to see that law about switchblades before it happened. I know I would, simply because I've never seen language so precise before and would like to learn its history. Hopefully, we can remain civil enough to permit someone else to post it before that occurs.