DWS1117
Member
This has probably been done before, but oh well.
Which makers have the best and worst web sites?
I lean to simple and full of information without lots of clutter. Pictures of the products is a plus. More than one angle is better but just nice pictures is good enough. Flash intros annoy me. And last but not least, somewhat frequent updates.
Best:
CZ, Springfield, Kimber, Ed Brown, Baretta, Benelli, and Sigarms are some of my favorites.
Worst:
Glock: Do they even remember that they have a web site. They still don't list the G37.
Colt: Improved over the last version but still sucks IMO.
What are some of the things that you would like to see some of them do with thier sites?
Which makers have the best and worst web sites?
I lean to simple and full of information without lots of clutter. Pictures of the products is a plus. More than one angle is better but just nice pictures is good enough. Flash intros annoy me. And last but not least, somewhat frequent updates.
Best:
CZ, Springfield, Kimber, Ed Brown, Baretta, Benelli, and Sigarms are some of my favorites.
Worst:
Glock: Do they even remember that they have a web site. They still don't list the G37.
Colt: Improved over the last version but still sucks IMO.
What are some of the things that you would like to see some of them do with thier sites?