California Interstate question

Status
Not open for further replies.

ChaoSS

Member
Joined
May 23, 2009
Messages
1,109
I should probably know this, but I lose track of the various laws regarding this sort of thing...

Is it legal for me, a resident of California, to travel to another state, purchase a firearm that is illegal in California, and leave it out of state? For example, if I wanted to go to Colorado and purchase a gun that violates CA's ridiculous AW laws and leave it at my dad's house?
 
Well there is federal law.
Federal law states that the sale of a firearm through an FFL to an out of state resident must comply with the laws of both states.
Private sales to an out of state resident are not legal, so they all have to go through an FFL.
Some California laws on purchase therefore must be followed.


If an "assault weapon" is illegal inside of California then would you be able to buy it and keep it in another state without technically violating California's laws since it would only be illegal if actually taken within the borders of California?
Certainly a valid legal argument. Its purchase would appear to violate no California law because California only prohibits possession or importation or otherwise restricts the firearm within the borders of the state.
But do the law enforcers feel the same way? Unlikely.

Although you would have to prove your Colorado residency to buy a gun and take possession of it in Colorado.
This would be an intentional violation of federal law if the sale does not comply with California law. Lying about residency to bypass federal restrictions would be a crime.
If you are not actually planning to be a resident, whatever that happens to mean (planning to live there or work there etc) then you cannot say you are a resident legally.



Magazines, flash suppressors, bayonet lugs, pistol grip stocks, etc are not firearms nor regulated by federal law. Therefore you can most certainly purchase any such thing outside of the state, but bringing some of them back to California like magazines over 10 rounds would still be illegal.
If you can get an out of state dealer to add a feature to an off list lower prior to transfer, like a $10-20 bullet button while it has a magazine holding less than 10 rounds installed, rendering the firearm a fixed magazine firearm with less than 10 rounds, it would be perfectly legal in California, and therefore certainly legal to purchase even if assault weapons in general prove not to be. Meaning you could have the dealer turn an "assault weapon" into a non "assault weapon" with a cheap non permanent modification with an easily removable feature prior to actual transfer. Therefore making it a completely legal transfer under California law.
The issue is this modification would need to be done by the dealer prior to actual sale, because the transfer would only be legal after it was a fixed magazine firearm with a less than 10 round magazine under California law. So you need an FFL willing to modify an unsold firearm. You could not simply purchase something not legal to purchase and then do the modification after the transfer as it is the configuration at the time of transfer that matters.
But since the bullet button essentially just swaps out the magazine release it is far from a modification that leaves them in a tough spot if the sale does not complete. They just reverse the simple installation and the firearm is completely unmodified.
Of course they likely won't have a such a device in a free state. So bring one with you for the specific type of firearm.

Once transferred you are then free to remove that while out of state and keep the firearm out of state in any desired configuration while adding any prohibited features to it you wish.
Just like you can bring such a firearm purchased in California out of state with you and put it into "assault weapon" configuration without violating any California law.
This would work with any firearm that is an "assault weapon" by features rather than listed specifically by name by the state of California.


The main problem with such methods would be the lack of understanding of California technicalities by FFLs in another state. And therefore their lack of desire to risk running afoul of one of the laws they do not know.
So unwilling to work with you.
Unless they actually know California law, it may sound like something suspicious to them. California laws are complicated and scary to out of state FFLs who do not wish to lose their license or get into trouble making a mistake.
So you can tell them completely valid methods of compliance and still have them unwilling to play a game with rules they do not understand.
 
Last edited:
yeah, long story short, I would build an OLL, then when you go on vacation to your dads, reconfigure it when you are there, and either leave it there, or neuter it back to california legal status and bring it back home with you. That way, you can shoot it in california too, and not just when you are at your dads.
 
yeah, long story short, I would build an OLL, then when you go on vacation to your dads, reconfigure it when you are there, and either leave it there, or neuter it back to california legal status and bring it back home with you. That way, you can shoot it in california too, and not just when you are at your dads.

But if you purchase it out of state you can get a wider selection of such firearms much cheaper.
You just need to really understand the Assault Weapon laws thoroughly to create a legal variant from firearms out of state.

There is types which can be made California legal which are not even sold in California.
 
just a random question, what if you have a place in two different states. I've been thinking of a summer place up in say CO, WY, MT? Are you then a resident of both states.
 
Were I the Out-of-State FFL and you came in wanting to buy a CA illegal gun, even with your and a bunch of internet laywers opinion that if you "read" the law just right, it's OK because you are going to either not take it back to CA (maybe) or you will alter it to a legal configuration (maybe) before you do, I would have to look at how much I value my FFL and what kind of grief I could be put through vs. the profit involved in the sale.
After due consideration, I think I would decline the sale.
There's no guarantee that the "powers that be" are going to interpret the law the same way and even if I can win in court, it's still going to cost me more time and money than any profit I may make. From my business point of view it just isn't worth the risk or hassle.
 
California Interstate question
I should probably know this, but I lose track of the various laws regarding this sort of thing...

Is it legal for me, a resident of California, to travel to another state, purchase a firearm that is illegal in California, and leave it out of state? For example, if I wanted to go to Colorado and purchase a gun that violates CA's ridiculous AW laws and leave it at my dad's house?
As posed, the answer to the question is 'not legal'.

Zoogster has the reason:
Well there is federal law.

Federal law states that the sale of a firearm through an FFL to an out of state resident must comply with the laws of both states.

Private sales to an out of state resident are not legal, so they all have to go through an FFL.

Some California laws on purchase therefore must be followed.

See also Transferring Firearms Interstate at the Calguns Foundation Wiki.
 
But if you purchase it out of state you can get a wider selection of such firearms much cheaper.
You just need to really understand the Assault Weapon laws thoroughly to create a legal variant from firearms out of state.

There is types which can be made California legal which are not even sold in California.

True, however I built my OLL for ~650 not including the optic. It can be done, and with lower prices coming back down, its not that hard. This is assuming he is talking about an AR though, which he may not be.
 
azyogi said:
just a random question, what if you have a place in two different states. I've been thinking of a summer place up in say CO, WY, MT? Are you then a resident of both states.

Yes. See example 2 below.

http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/tex...iv8&view=text&node=27:3.0.1.2.3.2.1.1&idno=27

State of residence. The State in which an individual resides. An individual resides in a State if he or she is present in a State with the intention of making a home in that State. If an individual is on active duty as a member of the Armed Forces, the individual's State of residence is the State in which his or her permanent duty station is located. An alien who is legally in the United States shall be considered to be a resident of a State only if the alien is residing in the State and has resided in the State for a period of at least 90 days prior to the date of sale or delivery of a firearm. The following are examples that illustrate this definition:

Example 1. A maintains a home in State X. A travels to State Y on a hunting, fishing, business, or other type of trip. A does not become a resident of State Y by reason of such trip.

Example 2. A is a U.S. citizen and maintains a home in State X and a home in State Y. A resides in State X except for weekends or the summer months of the year and in State Y for the weekends or the summer months of the year. During the time that A actually resides in State X, A is a resident of State X, and during the time that A actually resides in State Y, A is a resident of State Y.
 
To be strictly legal, you could do this:

You buy a stripped OLL in CA.
Your dad buys a complete rifle in CO.
You go to CO and put all the parts from his rifle onto your lower, and leave the complete rifle in Colorado (or put on a bullet button and bring it back to CA).
He sells the stripped lower remaining from the rifle he bought.

That would be 100% legal.

Obviously, this wouldn't work for guns that don't have "lowers", or can't possibly be configured CA-legal.

Another option? He can buy the rifle and keep it in CO. You can borrow it whenever you're there. As long as it's in his possession, it's not a straw purchase. There's no law saying you can't gift him $1000 to go buy a gun for himself.

If you move to CO again, he can give you the gun. That's also legal. If you move to another state, it will legally have to go through an FFL in your state.

All of that said, there aren't that many guns that are illegal under CA's AW laws, with the right minor modifications.
 
Last edited:
Ok, I understand the logic. Probably technically, legal, maybe, but not something that an FFL would like to deal with taking that risk. So, my options are to do something like a bullet button, or I have him make the purchase.

First, if he purchases it. I know there are laws against straw man purchases, but that really isn't what this is, if I never take the gun back to CA. If he got "caught" with it, he'd have his own gun, in his own state, if I got "caught" with it, I'd be using his gun in a state where that is legal. So I can't imagine prosecution, but is that still technically a violation of strawman purchase laws, or do those only apply to people who seek to illegally own a gun or who intend to commit crimes with said gun?

Now, as for the bullet button...

I've always been wary of those. I kind of forgot about those while asking this question, as I've never considered them an option, but I could consider it. It seems to me, though, that if the button malfunctions, if it jams "open", then you could shove in a mag, hold it in place manually, and when done firing, let it drop out, thus, you now have a very illegal gun. I'd be very wary of having a gun that could have a simple malfunction and put me in a position of looking at a whole lotta jail time.

The other question, as I see that I can't buy a CA legal gun and bring it back with me from CO, is how would I go about getting a gun with the bullet button? I was not looking at an AR, I was looking at something very inexpensive, like a Hi Point carbine or something. (I know, I know, don't tell me how bad they are). As I understand it, even a CA FFL can't import one and then make the conversion, am I correct? Could I, perhaps, have a CO dealer do that, and then do the transfer through a CA dealer, is that how I would do it?
 
A CA Assault Weapon dealer can import and modify a gun. Not worth it for a Hi-Point. Those who have those dealer licenses tend to charge their prices.
 
Ok, I understand the logic. Probably technically, legal, maybe, but not something that an FFL would like to deal with taking that risk. So, my options are to do something like a bullet button, or I have him make the purchase.

First, if he purchases it. I know there are laws against straw man purchases, but that really isn't what this is, if I never take the gun back to CA. If he got "caught" with it, he'd have his own gun, in his own state, if I got "caught" with it, I'd be using his gun in a state where that is legal. So I can't imagine prosecution, but is that still technically a violation of strawman purchase laws, or do those only apply to people who seek to illegally own a gun or who intend to commit crimes with said gun?


No, you are not understanding the law here.
He cannot sell or transfer ownership of a firearm to you directly because you are an out of state resident.
Any firearm you obtain must be transferred through an FFL.
You may borrow a firearm under the laws of the state, but you may not legally own that firearm without transfer through an FFL.
If ownership of the firearm is transferred to you then both you and he would be guilty of violating federal law without going through an FFL.
If you go through an FFL the firearm must comply with California law before it is transferred to you. It does not need to stay compliant with California law after being transferred to you while outside of California, but it must be California legal at the time you become the legal owner.


Now, as for the bullet button...


The other question, as I see that I can't buy a CA legal gun and bring it back with me from CO, is how would I go about getting a gun with the bullet button? I was not looking at an AR, I was looking at something very inexpensive, like a Hi Point carbine or something. (I know, I know, don't tell me how bad they are). As I understand it, even a CA FFL can't import one and then make the conversion, am I correct? Could I, perhaps, have a CO dealer do that, and then do the transfer through a CA dealer, is that how I would do it?

You can buy a California legal gun and bring it back with you or leave it in CO. The problem is that it must be legal in California at the time of purchase or transfer, not after you buy it.
You cannot buy a firearm and then modify it to comply with California law. It must already be in a legal configuration or be modified before it is transferred to you through the FFL. However a CO resident (like your dad) or the FFL, or even you while borrowing the gun can modify it to comply with California law before the transfer and be legal. The transfer must still be done through an FFL in CO though.
(It must be modified exactly in compliance with California law and not be on one of the bad lists or federal violations occur.)

Once you own it then you can legally can put it into any configuration allowed under CO law while in that state. You simply cannot purchase it in such a configuration because under federal law it must comply with California sales restrictions before you become the legal owner.

The rifle or shotgun must not be on these lists or it is an "assault weapon" in any configuration:
http://www.ag.ca.gov/firearms/awlist.htm
http://www.ag.ca.gov/firearms/infobuls/kaslist.pdf

A weapon not on those lists must not have one of these features at the time it is transferred to you in CO:


# A semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that has the capacity to accept a detachable magazine and any one of the following:

1. A pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon.
2. A thumbhole stock.
3. A folding or telescoping stock.
4. A grenade launcher or flare launcher.
5. A flash suppressor.
6. A forward pistol grip.

# A semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that has a fixed magazine with the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds.
# A semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that has an overall length of less than 30 inches.

Or a shotgun with these features:
# A semiautomatic shotgun that has both of the following:

1. A folding or telescoping stock.
2. A pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon, thumbhole stock, or vertical handgrip.

# A semiautomatic shotgun that has the ability to accept a detachable magazine.
# Any shotgun with a revolving cylinder.


The trick here is the definition of "detachable magazine".
Under California law it is only a detachable magazine if it can be removed without the use of a tool. The "bullet button" complies with this by making it physically impossible to press the button with your finger tip. You must use a smaller thinner object to press the button. That smaller thinner object is a "tool".

12276.1. (a) Notwithstanding Section 12276, "assault weapon"
shall also mean any of the following:
(1) A semiautomatic, centerfire rifle that has the capacity
to accept any ammunition feeding device that can be removed
readily from the firearm with neither disassembly of the
firearm action nor use of a tool being required and any one of the following: (list of features above).
(7) A semiautomatic shotgun that has the ability to accept a
detachable magazine.


Everyone seems stuck on ways to comply with an AR which are a modular rifle overly simplifying things.


Lets take a Saiga 12 shotgun. They are generally not available for sale in California. They are not specified on the list of prohibited shotguns.
If they have a bullet button installed they do not accept a detachable magazine, and possess a "fixed magazine" because they require a "tool" to remove the magazine.
They cannot have a pistol grip installed, or a folding or telescoping stock on them at the time of transfer. The magazine inserted in it at the time of the transfer must be under 10 rounds in capacity because it is technically the "fixed magazine".
However if they have a $10-20 bullet button installed and a fixed non pistol grip stock installed prior to transfer or sale to a California resident they are actually a California legal firearm.
Which could be purchased out of state.
Once already purchased or transferred to the CA resident there is no law preventing the CA resident from using it in any CO legal configuration while in the state of CO.
It simply must be in a CA legal configuration before they if they ever take it back across CA state lines.


Were I the Out-of-State FFL and you came in wanting to buy a CA illegal gun, even with your and a bunch of internet laywers opinion that if you "read" the law just right, it's OK because you are going to either not take it back to CA (maybe) or you will alter it to a legal configuration (maybe) before you do, I would have to look at how much I value my FFL and what kind of grief I could be put through vs. the profit involved in the sale.

That is not the law! The law is it must be California legal at the time of the transfer.
You can accomplish that with a firearm not on the above lists, which is still illegal in California due to features by altering the features to comply BEFORE the transfer.
You are then not liable for anything the person chooses to do because you sold it in legal configuration under CA law.
If they choose to take it into California in any type of illegal configuration it is they who are breaking the law. The FFL that transferred the firearm in a CA legal configuration has no liability whatsoever.
You however may not sell them the firearm with the the understanding they will modify it to be compliant after the sale. It must be in a CA legal configuration at the time of the transfer.
So whether you let them modify it while you still technically own it, or you modify it yourself with a $10-20 component does not matter, but it must be modified before the transfer.
It must be modified before the processing of the transfer and they become the legal owner.
 
Last edited:
That is not the law! The law is it must be California legal at the time of the transfer.
You can accomplish that with a firearm not on the above lists, which is still illegal in California due to features by altering the features to comply BEFORE the transfer.

Zooster, If you carefully read what I posted, that is exactly what I said.
I wouldn't sell him a "CA Illegal firearm". If I or someone else reconfigures (as described) it prior to the sale, then it would no longer be a "CA Illegal firearm" and I would sell it. I could care less what he does with it then.
 
No, you are not understanding the law here.
He cannot sell or transfer ownership of a firearm to you directly because you are an out of state resident.
Any firearm you obtain must be transferred through an FFL.
You may borrow a firearm under the laws of the state, but you may not legally own that firearm without transfer through an FFL.
If ownership of the firearm is transferred to you then both you and he would be guilty of violating federal law without going through an FFL.
If you go through an FFL the firearm must comply with California law before it is transferred to you. It does not need to stay compliant with California law after being transferred to you while outside of California, but it must be California legal at the time you become the legal owner.
Yeah, but what's the definition of ownership? If he buys it (with my money) and leaves it in a safe at his house, how could it be said that I own it?

As for the bullet button, I understand how it works, and how it makes the gun legal. My concern is that if it breaks in such a manner that it will no longer hold the magazine in place, then you suddenly have a situation in which you can put in a mag, hold it in place while you shoot, and simply pull it out and change it without the "tool", thus, an illegal weapon.
 
change it without the "tool", thus, an illegal weapon.

Only if you take it back to CA. :evil:

If he buys it (with my money) and leaves it in a safe at his house, how could it be said that I own it?

That would be a straw purchase. You know, if you have to play games to get around the law, it's still illegal even if they can't "prove" it.
 
Last edited:
Only if you take it back to CA.
That would be the point of a bullet button.

That would be a straw purchase. You know, if you have to play games to get around the law, it's still illegal even if they can't "prove" it.
Doesn't seem like playing games to get around the law, any more than a father who buys a gun for his 12 year old son, and keeps it in his own gun safe except when they go out shooting, is playing games to get around the law that says no one under 18 can own a gun.
 
Doesn't seem like playing games to get around the law, any more than a father who buys a gun for his 12 year old son, and keeps it in his own gun safe except when they go out shooting, is playing games to get around the law that says no one under 18 can own a gun.

Note that it is the father who bought the gun and the 12 year old is under supervision when they go out. It wasn't the 12 year old that put up the money because he couldn't legally buy the gun himself. It isn't HIS gun, it's his fathers. Your scenario is it will be your gun and your father is just storing it for you.
And are you going to be under your fathers supervision whenever you take it out?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top