Sansone:
Thanks for the kind words, and so far so good, the expected result is already coming to fruition. I just applied the 3rd coat of stain (got side-tracked yesterday) and it's already looking beautiful.
I was amiss when I said the stain was Minwax Red Oak 219. It's actually 215. And I'm not sure if it's oil or pigment, but as finished on the Mosin and K31, the grain still shows through remarkably, and it's doing the same for the Mauser.
Now, my qualms about water. I do not like getting it on the wood, and will simply refuse to do so. I'm not sure why I'm so against it, but I can do the whole process without it with just-as-good results as with. Just never really cared for getting naked wood wet. Yes, I have hunted with all three of the rifles mentioned in this post, and have gotten rain on all of 'em. But my applications of Tung Oil has kept the damaging effects out of the K31 and the Mosin, and the amount of Cosmoline (USSR says it's oil, but I'm going to say cosmoline because it looks, smells, and feels just like cosmoline; if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck...) was keeping it out of the Mauser.
BCRider:
I like the dents in the wood, they've given the rifle character that I don't want to change. The color of the wood? Sure. It looked like crap. But the dents, to me, make the rifle. I'm sure it has seen field use, being made at the K.Kale factory (I'm assuming it's a factory, seeing threads on here saying K.Kale Turks were the better ones [If anyone has some information for a good read on this, I would love a link]) in 1940, it's probably seen field operations somewhere. I remember reading somewhere back in the 6th grade (quite a few years ago) that the Germans used whatever they could find. And being made in 1940, I'm sure that either they, or someone had gotten a hold of this rifle and put it to it's intended use sometime in it's life.
My Mosin M44 has five burns in the stock under the bolt. I think they might have been made with a hot, deformed stripper clip, or more likely whatever they could find, to mark kills. That's what I like to believe. Because this rifle, being made in 1944, and definately not too late to have been issued to a Red Army soldier, I'm willing to bet that those marks were made to tally kills.
You may say it's in the finish? No. It wasn't in the shellac. It was burned deep into the stock, from what I can tell. When I stripped the Shellac off, these marks stayed, along with a marking on the butt stock by the sling hole (of which I believe to be an arsenal mark). Even after sanding these marks remained.
I like the look of the rifle so far, it's looking good to me. I'm sure others here will approve. I'm reaching the expected results, and the project is coming together spectacularly. There's going to be updates coming, one today in fact, to show you guys the progress.