Did JMB forsee this?

Status
Not open for further replies.
No, Browning wasn't perfect, but he was persistent ...

Few people today understand how what became the model 1911 pistol came about. John Browning and other engineers at Colt didn't simply sit down with a piece of paper on the drawing board and create the pistol.

Browning first work on semi-automatic pistols started during the late 1890's, and Colt made and marketed his first commercial pistol in 1900. From the beginning there was close collaboration between Browning (the inventor/designer), Colt (the manufacturer) and The U.S. Army's Ordnance Department (the potential buyer).

They followed a simple procedure. Browning would design a prototype, Colt would make it, and the Army would test it. The inventor always made it a point to attend the trials, to personally demonstrate his pistol, and to pay careful attention to how things went. Following the test he would repeat the process, always learning from the trials and the reports that they generated, and then building a better prototype. This went on from 1900 through late 1910 (1905 through 1910 on .45 pistols in particular).

How many gun companies would take that long, and be so meticulous, in bringing out a new product today? Not many, and most of the testing would be through computer models and simulation. If something didn't work out, oh well - that could be fixed later.

No, the guns that are being marketed today are not what Browning, Colt and the U.S. Army originally came up with. They have been "improved" to the point where they don't always work anymore.
 
Not the Same

Fuff said:

>No, the guns that are being marketed today are not what Browning, Colt and the U.S. Army originally came up with. They have been "improved" to the point where they don't always work anymore.<
***********************

Sad, but true. The GOOD news though, is that with most guns, it's pretty easy to correct the problem. Colts and Springfields seem to be the easiest
to bring into spec, followed closely by the Norincos. Don't see enough Kimbers around here to make a call on'em. Ditto the higher-end Springers, other than the occasional Loaded Model. The Norks' main issues are with some of the barrels...and there ain't much recourse than to replace those... along with the occasionally mis-fit thumb and grip safeties. Norks are fairly rough...so don't expect to be impressed by the machining and finish...but they're usually functional and tough as pig iron. I know a guy who bought two when they were goin' out the door for 240 bucks....He's been doin' his level best ever since to shoot'em both to destruction, so far without any success.

The ever-dwindling supply of good USGI parts make this a challenge...but they're around if ya take the time to search. There are some good aftermarket parts too...but not all of'em are created the same...and the better ones are pricey, but still worth the cost if you want an enduring, reliable 1911-pattern pistol to call your own.

Start with good magazines and a good extractor and go from there. You'd be surprised how many lemons turn into lemonade with nothing more than that...
assuming that you don't insist on using junk ammo.

Tuner....OUT! ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.