Not sure about aks thats why Im asking here. Secondly tell that to all the C93 ownsers lol who baught c93s from century so yes in some way you do get what you pay for. I decided wed morning when I call it will be between these ones http://www.atlanticfirearms.com/storeproduct1102.aspxI've had milled AK's and in my opinion, they're just to darn heavy.
Regarding rifle #1. If you're going to spend $1600 on an AK, you should have your head examined. Even rifle #2 at $1000 is a stretch for an AK.
If I HAD to choose one over the other, I'd take rifle #2 as I've had a Bulgarian AK and it was far and away the most refined, most accurate AK I've ever owned. BUt honestly, if you're looking at spending that kind of coin, buy the Sig instead.
If you DO buy either one, drag it down to SW Florida, we'll hit the outdoor range and I'll bet my US built Inter-Ordnance will give it a run for it's money.
Shes good I payed "her" house off shes 22 im 24 and she works part time so shes got her own money im done lol =)The first is superior because it's 600 dollars more. I'm serious, actually. So many people fall for the line that "this is more money, so it must be better." Honestly, either one will be a rifle that should last you a lifetime. If I was you, I'd save the extra money and buy your significant other a nice dinner date and flowers to "make up" for the new rifle.