I recently rented the regular frame Glock 21 at my local range and shot really well with it and really enjoyed it. So now I MUST have one. However, the grip did feel a bit bulky to me, especially the "hump" at the bottom, which is the reason I believe it points high for me. Now, I also had the opportunity to handle the Glock 21SF since they had one for sale. I found the grip to be really comfortable . However, I was not able to shoot the SF since they only had the regular frame Glock 21 for rent.
So, I am torn between the regular frame and short frame Glock 21. Honestly, I shot so well with the regular frame that I wouldn't want to mess that up. From my experience, just because a gun is comfortable doesn't mean you will shoot it well and vice-versa. For example, the HK P30 is very comfortable to me, but I shoot the Beretta 92fs much more accurately even though I don't find the grip very comfortable.
Do you guys think that since I shoot the regular frame well, I should just stick with that, even though I really do find the short frame much more comfortable? Is it conceivable that I might not shoot the SF as well? Do those of you that have shot both the regular frame and SF/Gen 4 find that you improve with the SF or Gen 4 grips?
Thanks!
So, I am torn between the regular frame and short frame Glock 21. Honestly, I shot so well with the regular frame that I wouldn't want to mess that up. From my experience, just because a gun is comfortable doesn't mean you will shoot it well and vice-versa. For example, the HK P30 is very comfortable to me, but I shoot the Beretta 92fs much more accurately even though I don't find the grip very comfortable.
Do you guys think that since I shoot the regular frame well, I should just stick with that, even though I really do find the short frame much more comfortable? Is it conceivable that I might not shoot the SF as well? Do those of you that have shot both the regular frame and SF/Gen 4 find that you improve with the SF or Gen 4 grips?
Thanks!