adobewalls
Member
BruceRDucer
Yep, I read "Shooter" also and what I took away from that was the VERY disruptive effect of accurate aimed fire on the battle field and how that can be a force multiplier in an urban environment. Hense the aggressor sets the tone of the battlefield.
Back on the Texas Rangers, and even afterwards the standard cavalry tactic was to ride to location, dismount and shoot. So cavalries were effectively only swift moving foot soldiers. However the potential fo the Colt 6 shooter changed that whole paradigm.
Another one from the Texas Rangers, the Battle of Enchanted Rock. Again, here the colts helped, but it was attitude that carried the day.
http://www.forttours.com/pages/jackhays.asp#ENCHANTED ROCK
Sun Tsu said it first, if you want men to fight, put them in a position where there is no retreat and the only option is kill or be killed.
To follow up on what 1811Tuner said, in Clint Eastwood's movie "Unforgiven" the whole discourse between Little Bill and Beauchamp on gun fighting is worthwhile. Little Bill explains that most drovers, teamsters and the like carried guns, but were not killers - Like he and English Bob were.
But I also remember watching an interview with Louis Lamour when I was a kid. The interviewer asked him about the "High Noon" scenario. To which Louis Lamour laughed and said the townspeople would have shot Frank Miller and his gang deader than donuts. He reasoned that even in the 1880's you had a lot of Civil War veterans that (1) knew how to use firearms, and (2) wouldn't stand for any two bit bank robbers endangering their town.
In fact most "dangerous" men were either lawmen, or outlaws that stayed close to home where they had family to hide them or warn them when the law was coming
Just for fun check this link if you want see the story of Bill Longley - the real deal when it came to bad hombres.
http://www.legendsofamerica.com/TX-BillLongley.html
Yep, I read "Shooter" also and what I took away from that was the VERY disruptive effect of accurate aimed fire on the battle field and how that can be a force multiplier in an urban environment. Hense the aggressor sets the tone of the battlefield.
Back on the Texas Rangers, and even afterwards the standard cavalry tactic was to ride to location, dismount and shoot. So cavalries were effectively only swift moving foot soldiers. However the potential fo the Colt 6 shooter changed that whole paradigm.
Another one from the Texas Rangers, the Battle of Enchanted Rock. Again, here the colts helped, but it was attitude that carried the day.
http://www.forttours.com/pages/jackhays.asp#ENCHANTED ROCK
Sun Tsu said it first, if you want men to fight, put them in a position where there is no retreat and the only option is kill or be killed.
To follow up on what 1811Tuner said, in Clint Eastwood's movie "Unforgiven" the whole discourse between Little Bill and Beauchamp on gun fighting is worthwhile. Little Bill explains that most drovers, teamsters and the like carried guns, but were not killers - Like he and English Bob were.
But I also remember watching an interview with Louis Lamour when I was a kid. The interviewer asked him about the "High Noon" scenario. To which Louis Lamour laughed and said the townspeople would have shot Frank Miller and his gang deader than donuts. He reasoned that even in the 1880's you had a lot of Civil War veterans that (1) knew how to use firearms, and (2) wouldn't stand for any two bit bank robbers endangering their town.
In fact most "dangerous" men were either lawmen, or outlaws that stayed close to home where they had family to hide them or warn them when the law was coming
Just for fun check this link if you want see the story of Bill Longley - the real deal when it came to bad hombres.
http://www.legendsofamerica.com/TX-BillLongley.html