Help Support Ron Paul in this online Presidential Poll!

Status
Not open for further replies.

pautz3314

Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2007
Messages
9
If you like Ron Paul but are worried about his name recognition outside the firearms community, vote for him as your favorite 2008 candidate in this online poll. if other people see him near the top of the list, they'll probably view him as a more viable candidate, which could win him even more votes.

you get 2 votes per IP address. Let's push his name to the top of the list!
 
oops...scratch that. looks like in the 2 minutes it took me to post the thread, he was suspended for voting fraud. :banghead:
 
When I read the post, there were zero responses. By the time I posted, five responses...in about 60 seconds. The interest level is heartening. :)
 
from the site:
Track stewards have suspended the Ron Paul barn from this 2008 horserace web poll for using computer generated votes that were fraudulently being generated at a rate of over 10 per minute when the plug was pulled on this misguided, shortsighted and just plain stupid attempt to fool American voters into supporting a candidate with so little real support that his out of control stall muckers felt compelled to commit fraud on the American voting public.


classy.
 
from the earlier comments it sounds like it was a pretty predictable script that generated the false votes. (incremental ip addresses).
A real shame somebody felt the need to cheat and get him knocked off before we could weigh in on it...

of course with the obviously condescending comments of the site owner, who knows.
 
this is a huge disappointment. if you're all interested, I'll post a thread for the next major online poll I find, and we can flood it with LEGITIMATE votes before the cheaters have a chance to screw it up for the rest of us. but it is still nice to see this much support in such a small timeframe for Ron, even if it's just among people on this forum. :cool:
 
It's not the first online poll to claim that there was automated voting taking place for Paul, although the last one I saw claimig that at least didn't insist, without any apparent evidence, that it was being done by Paul's staff.

Online polls are generally worthless. Online polls that refuse to let you vote for one of the candidates manage to have negative worth.
 
well then, if thats all it takes

Quote:
Track stewards have suspended the Ron Paul barn from this 2008 horserace web poll for using computer generated votes that were fraudulently being generated at a rate of over 10 per minute when the plug was pulled on this misguided, shortsighted and just plain stupid attempt to fool American voters into supporting a candidate with so little real support that his out of control stall muckers felt compelled to commit fraud on the American voting public.

Quick... everyone vote for Billary had O'bomination
 
Scroll to the bottom of the page. Click on the photo of Ron Paul. By clicking on his photo you are actually casting a vote for him indirectly.

The "click-through" is tabulated somewhere. If the webmaster really cares, he can see that Paul gets more click-throughs than other people.
 
From the Wall Street Journal

February 14, 2007, 3:49 pm
Ron Paul: Capturing the Spammer Vote?
Rep. Ron Paul of Texas has been running something of a stealth campaign for the Republican nomination. His campaign Web site isn’t exactly ready for prime time and it’s not clear he’s doing much in the way of fund-raising. Anyone interested in contributing is encouraged to send a check to his exploratory committee, based in the Texas town of Clute, which may be best known as the home of the annual Great Texas Mosquito Festival.
But could there be some sort of ground-swell within the Republican ranks? This week, the weekly Pajamas Media presidential straw poll showed Paul in first place among Republican candidates, gathering 1,125 votes from readers. Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani came in second place with 556 votes, and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney attracted 358.
Perplexed by the results, the site looked into the voting and discovered massive fraud. Apparently, some 400 votes for Paul came from “someone behind a proxy at a large aircraft manufacturer,” 200 votes came from St. Louis and another 85 came from “someone at the University of South Carolina.” Efforts to expunge the ballot-box stuffers showed that Giuliani actually won the weekly poll, although it’s not entirely clear how many votes were tossed for fraud and the poll still shows Paul with a commanding lead. –Amy Schatz

Okay assuming that this is not some cover up by the WSJ and the votes counted are correct Paul still came in 2nd.

That is out of everybody running.

I am really not a tin foil hat type but:

Something really odd is happening here.

Why are so many people on this board suddenly advocating that we compromise with the repubs? I am new so is this a new thing?
 
What kind of asinine people pull a candidate from their poll because of the actions of a couple jerks? Delete the fraudulent votes and fix your website to prevent this kind of thing, don't punish the wrong people.

I'm tempted to start up a script to start making automated vote for all the candidates.
 
I'm not usually a "conspiracy teorist," but is it posible that third party candidates seen as real potential threats are being deliberately sabotaged? After all, during the last round of presidential debates, the third party candidates that showed up were arrested and processed so they couldn't participate....
 
It doesn't say what or why...

paul2.jpg


he didn't pay his track fees?
 
Last edited:
I don't quite understand why people are getting so worked up over some insignificant website. It even proclaims its own insignificance with the banners for online poker and a page devoted to counting down the time left in Bush's term.

If you get mad about every moron you run across, you'll never be happy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top