The purpose of this post was to see for myself(no one else) IF(pretend but possible just like TEOTWAWKI) one of these two people was going to be the next president who would or rather who you wouldnt want to see as getting the job. You say you wouldnt vote ok great but which would you rather see than the other. Why these two people? Becuase they are some and will continue to be some of the biggest names in the game. I believe I would rather see Barack Obama than Mrs. Clinton. For those that can contemplate this thanks for participating.
Hillary or Barack?
- Thread starter Mizzle187
- Start date
- Status
Ohen Cepel
Member
Since a turnip isn't listed as an option I didn't vote in the poll.
I can't see a situation where I would ever vote for either of them.
I can't see a situation where I would ever vote for either of them.
Barrick Obama - Mr. Nothing as we in illinois refer to him...
How or why does he even deserve beign talked about in this vein. He is another Democratic lackey without substance paying his dues to the powers that be.
Give me Hillary, or give me death..... er.....gee.... do i really have to choose ?
How or why does he even deserve beign talked about in this vein. He is another Democratic lackey without substance paying his dues to the powers that be.
Give me Hillary, or give me death..... er.....gee.... do i really have to choose ?
Turkey Creek
Member
Let's see, which do I want to die from, the plague or bone cancer? Either way I'm screwed and it won't be pleasant
Urgent: MI Castle Doctrine Again - Senate side this time
Get the letters going again, folks. The 4 bills passed out of committee today and will go to the full Senate but the Bradys are already working on this and the Senate is hearing from a lot of them.
Get busy!!!!
If it passes here, it goes to Jenny's desk and she has to make a decision.
I'm on my way out the door but if anyone needs help with this, finding their Senator, writing the letter, whatever, shoot me an email and I'll try to catch you before I go to sleep tonight.
Get the letters going again, folks. The 4 bills passed out of committee today and will go to the full Senate but the Bradys are already working on this and the Senate is hearing from a lot of them.
Get busy!!!!
If it passes here, it goes to Jenny's desk and she has to make a decision.
I'm on my way out the door but if anyone needs help with this, finding their Senator, writing the letter, whatever, shoot me an email and I'll try to catch you before I go to sleep tonight.
Preacherman
Member
Master Blaster, please check your PM's.
Don Gwinn
Moderator Emeritus
Obama is not terribly serious about banning guns. As an Illinois legislator, he gave me the impression that if you could convince him that it was safe for people to own whatever they wanted (from a utilitarian point of view) he'd never mention gun control. He didn't understand the issue very well, in my opinion, but it wasn't something he'd look for a fight about.
As a national figure he will be anti-gun simply because he's a national Democrat figure. Hilary Clinton has more invested in that fight than he does by far.
As a national figure he will be anti-gun simply because he's a national Democrat figure. Hilary Clinton has more invested in that fight than he does by far.
mountainclmbr
Member
When I was a kid we would play that game:
Would you rather slide down a giant razor blade, on your bare butt, and land in a pool of iodine.
or
Have 1000 bees poured down your throat to sting their way out from the inside?
Only it really scares me more now.
Would you rather slide down a giant razor blade, on your bare butt, and land in a pool of iodine.
or
Have 1000 bees poured down your throat to sting their way out from the inside?
Only it really scares me more now.
Hillary's skeletons trump Barack's incompetence, IMO.
As for tellner's rant..
Seems to me the acceleration began immediately after BC signed onto NAFTA and GATT. These two trade agreements (again both signed by Bill Clinton) are completely responsible for "accelerated the de-industrialization of America, subsidized sending jobs overseas"
So what else is new...Sept. 2000 (election time). Was this release OK, or was it a sinister plan to destroy the World too?
A war based on the US suffering the highest civilian causality act of war in the history of the US. Prior to 9-11 what was OBL? He was a Middle Eastern extremist who made repeated threats of attack against the US. What was Saddam? A Middle Eastern extremist who made repeated threats against the US. The left would be screaming if GB did nothing about Saddam and he pulled off an attack in the US. Most of the Dems voted for getting rid of Saddam. Why?, because they were not willing to gamble that Saddam wouldn't attempt another 911.
By "the very richest" you mean tax payers, all tax payers. Do you feel that non-tax payers should receive a tax break too?
I have always wanted to ask someone who espoused this...Where are all of the lawsuits filed by companies capable of fulfilling the requirements of these contracts? There are none because there were no other companies capable of fulfilling the contracts.
No....That was a hurricane that destroyed NO, I don't recall another President ever being blamed for the destruction of a national disaster before.
"The sky is falling, it's falling, it's falling..we've got to tell the king" --Henny Penny
Good luck in this election cycle. I pray the Democrats start spouting more nonsense like this..it helps the Right.
As for tellner's rant..
Seems to me the acceleration began immediately after BC signed onto NAFTA and GATT. These two trade agreements (again both signed by Bill Clinton) are completely responsible for "accelerated the de-industrialization of America, subsidized sending jobs overseas"
So what else is new...Sept. 2000 (election time). Was this release OK, or was it a sinister plan to destroy the World too?
A war based on the US suffering the highest civilian causality act of war in the history of the US. Prior to 9-11 what was OBL? He was a Middle Eastern extremist who made repeated threats of attack against the US. What was Saddam? A Middle Eastern extremist who made repeated threats against the US. The left would be screaming if GB did nothing about Saddam and he pulled off an attack in the US. Most of the Dems voted for getting rid of Saddam. Why?, because they were not willing to gamble that Saddam wouldn't attempt another 911.
By "the very richest" you mean tax payers, all tax payers. Do you feel that non-tax payers should receive a tax break too?
I have always wanted to ask someone who espoused this...Where are all of the lawsuits filed by companies capable of fulfilling the requirements of these contracts? There are none because there were no other companies capable of fulfilling the contracts.
No....That was a hurricane that destroyed NO, I don't recall another President ever being blamed for the destruction of a national disaster before.
"The sky is falling, it's falling, it's falling..we've got to tell the king" --Henny Penny
Good luck in this election cycle. I pray the Democrats start spouting more nonsense like this..it helps the Right.
- Status
