Is Constitution Day Constitutional? Law School Asks

Status
Not open for further replies.

Desertdog

Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2002
Messages
1,980
Location
Ridgecrest Ca
Is Constitution Day Constitutional? Law School Asks
By Susan Jones
CNSNews.com Senior Editor
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?Page=\Nation\archive\200509\NAT20050919b.html

(CNSNews.com) - A new federal law requires every American school that receives taxpayer funding to teach students about the U.S. Constitution on or around Sept. 17, the anniversary of the document's signing in 1787.

Since the nation's first official Constitution Day fell on a Saturday this year, some schools plan to observe the occasion this week instead.

The federal mandate does not specify what (or how) students should be taught about the Constitution; every school is free to come up with its own program or lesson plan.

New York Law School announced that it will comply with the requirement -- but with a contrary twist.

The school announced it will hold a panel discussion entitled, "Is Constitution Day Constitutional: Byrd-Brained Idea or Welcome Opportunity?"

Panelists will consider the constitutionality of the requirement for schools to present programs or distribute materials relating to the United States Constitution on or about Sept. 17 each year, and they will discuss potentially more appropriate ways to teach Americans about the Constitution.

The law school's panel discussion is scheduled to take place on Wednesday, Sept. 21.

The requirement to observe Constitution Day was inserted into a spending bill by Sen. Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.) and signed into law by President George W. Bush on Dec. 8, 2004.

The Department of Education said it does not plan to monitor or enforce compliance with the requirement, and some schools and legal scholars have questioned whether the national requirement -- essentially allowing Congress to act as a school board -- is constitutional.

According to New York Law School, the requirement "resembles a federally mandated educational curriculum -- a mandate that many people would argue is not actually permitted by the Constitution."

Sen. Byrd writes on his website that he carries a copy of the U.S. Constitution with him wherever he goes. "I refer to it and study its provisions every day-but what about you?" he asks.

"Without constant study and renewal of our knowledge of the Constitution and its history, we are in peril of allowing our freedoms to erode," Byrd says. "If we fail to understand the importance of the checks and balances between Congress, the Supreme Court, and the Executive Branch, we will not be in a position to know when these checks are threatened."

Byrd has described the enactment of Constitution Day as a highlight of his career, and a number of civic-minded groups have seized on the occasion to distribute free copies of the Constitution.
 
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzlooks like a bunch of darn lawyers would know that if you take Federal funds the government practically owns you. Plus Public Schools are highly regulated by the great Commerce Clause. Being ordered to teach the constitution is minor compared to the gun free school zone, Blood alcohol level to be legally drunk and driving,speed limits,title nine etc. :barf: :barf: :barf: :barf: :barf:
 
Ditto Kim.

Of course, you realize the much of the problem is that the liberals believe that the constitution is a 'living document' up to continual reinterpretation. Actually reading the thing might give students the idea that, well, it's pretty straight forward in what it says government can and can't do.
 
I kind of like the idea of Constitution Day, especially if a bunch of 2A supporters would celebrate by carrying something on campus ...
 
But what if the local school wants to reject those funds, and not have the Const. day, but are forced to accept the funds by the state gov't? Then it just may be un-Const. What if they write a pro-rated check back to the fedgov for their funding attributable to this particular law? I guess that wouldn't work, as the fedgov could just say ALL fed funding is contingent upon obeying ALL strings attached (of which this is one).

In any event, if there were a mandate that the schools actually teach what the 2A really means, then it would be a good idea. Since they won't in many places, what purpose does it serve to re-inforce to the kiddos the standard BS liberal lie of "the 2A is antiquated and only applies to the National Guard"?
 
Why don't they ask if Martin Luther King day is constitutional, or if President's Day, which replaced Washington's and Lincoln's birthdays (can't have days honoring white guys ya know) is constitutional etc., et yada, et :barf:
 
Those who provide the funds can put any restrictions whatsoever on their use, so far as the restrictions don't violate some other law like non-discrimination, due process, etc.

Every lawyer at the school knows that, which shows that this is just a publicity stunt by ACLU-wannabees. If they don't like it, they're free to return the funds, quit, emigrate, etc.

Parents still pay money for their kids to attend such institutions of "higher learning"? Why?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top