philbo
Member
Looks like it just came out of his pocket!
Great post. I just came to the same conclusion regarding the PF9 and the Kahr CW9 last weekend. The Kahr is the keeper of the two for exactly the reasons you named.
Kel-Tec PF-9 vs. Kahr CW9 Comparison
- Thread starter wally
- Start date
- Status
Looks like it just came out of his pocket!
Great post. I just came to the same conclusion regarding the PF9 and the Kahr CW9 last weekend. The Kahr is the keeper of the two for exactly the reasons you named.
jahwarrior
Member
excellent thread! my brother bought the pf9, and other than reassembling it banghead, we've had a blast shooting it.
banghead, we've had a blast shooting it.
OP
OP
wally
Member
Bingo! I was carrying the J-frame that day and after taking the autoloader photos I thought I should throw in the J-frame comparison.
I've had very good customer service from both Kahr & Kel-Tec. Guns this small for their caliber are touchy. When you get one, don't be surprised if it has to go back initially or need repair more often than a full sized gun would.
Thanks for all the great feedback and comments.
--wally.
orionengnr
Member
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2005
- Messages
- 5,715
I've used Kahr Customer Service once, with excellent results.
I've owned four Kel-Tecs and used Kel-Tec Customer Service at least four times so far. They are great about sending free parts, but those parts have not, to date, resolved my problems.
The other noteworthy difference is the trigger. There is no comparison betweeen my PM9's trigger and my P-32, P3AT (two of them) or P-11.
I've owned four Kel-Tecs and used Kel-Tec Customer Service at least four times so far. They are great about sending free parts, but those parts have not, to date, resolved my problems.
The other noteworthy difference is the trigger. There is no comparison betweeen my PM9's trigger and my P-32, P3AT (two of them) or P-11.
- Status
