Status
Not open for further replies.

JmacD

Micah 6:8
Joined
Sep 9, 2021
Messages
1,409
Location
Nebraska
Can anyone get me any info, or point me to a reliable source on what the actual chamber pressure was in the small ring Mausers? I’ve got one chambered in 250-3000, I’m assuming I’ll be ok if it was 45k or under. I’ve found wildly varying numbers recommended and in various sources about the original 7x57…
I should note it’s a Mexican Mauser, so small ring with 3rd lug…
 
Last edited:
if your talking about a small ring 98 mauser, no problems at all. if your talking about 93-95 style actions then you need to be sure to stay with in certain limites. for me i would stay with 98 mauser actions.
 
Can anyone get me any info, or point me to a reliable source on what the actual chamber pressure was in the small ring Mausers? I’ve got one chambered in 250-3000, I’m assuming I’ll be ok if it was 45k or under. I’ve found wildly varying numbers recommended and in various sources about the original 7x57…
I should note it’s a Mexican Mauser, so small ring with 3rd lug…
If you can find a first or second edition of "Guns of the World" IIRC, it had specifications including chamber pressures for all of the US, Mauser and L-E rifles, plus a lot more. I lent my copy out several years ago and never got it back but I "think" it had all of the spec's for the Mauser international exports and domestic (German) production rifles.

EDIT: REF https://www.chuckhawks.com/small_ring_mausers.htm
In this article, Mike Hudson references J.M. Whittemore’s 1899 treatise, "Report Of Test of Mauser Arms And Ammunition Relative To Pressures And Velocities." That should give you as much info as can be found.
 
Last edited:
I picked up a few 93 small ring complete receivers from Sarco several weeks ago. These were spanish mauser (not Mexican) originally chambered in 7X57 mm. Keep in mind that todays powders most likely produces more chamber pressure than the powder used back in the turn of the century. I got a date on one of these receivers of 1920. I will keep these in the same caliber but reload for them at reduced loads . I agree with you with the 45K or under pressure.
 
Just checked the chamber pressure for the 450 bushmaster cartridge. Internet gives it approx. 38500.. Ballistic for that bullet is not too bad either especially 200 yds or less. I would like to get 3 or 4 rounds to see how they would fit and feed through the mauser mag before I decided.
 
If you can find a first or second edition of "Guns of the World" IIRC, it had specifications including chamber pressures for all of the US, Mauser and L-E rifles, plus a lot more. I lent my copy out several years ago and never got it back but I "think" it had all of the spec's for the Mauser international exports and domestic (German) production rifles.

EDIT: REF https://www.chuckhawks.com/small_ring_mausers.htm
In this article, Mike Hudson references J.M. Whittemore’s 1899 treatise, "Report Of Test of Mauser Arms And Ammunition Relative To Pressures And Velocities." That should give you as much info as can be found.
oh ya. Exactly what I’m looking for! I’m trying to carefully wring all I can out of the old bugger. And just not wanting to over due the action. Like these that were floating around a thread awhile back.
 

Attachments

  • 31106FB9-1E3F-4043-B34A-4BBB6CCC7685.jpeg
    31106FB9-1E3F-4043-B34A-4BBB6CCC7685.jpeg
    49.2 KB · Views: 16
I picked up a few 93 small ring complete receivers from Sarco several weeks ago. These were spanish mauser (not Mexican) originally chambered in 7X57 mm. Keep in mind that todays powders most likely produces more chamber pressure than the powder used back in the turn of the century. I got a date on one of these receivers of 1920. I will keep these in the same caliber but reload for them at reduced loads . I agree with you with the 45K or under pressure.
The Mexican is a bit of an anomaly I understand. Like a 95, but third lug and something else I don’t recall. I’m setting it in a Boyd’s stock and going to a Timney trigger. Want to modify the bolt shroud/safety to a model 70 style. Hopefully get it done so my dad can see it and maybe shoot it before age starts catching up with him to badly…
 
I have a m1916 Spanish mauser circa 1927. It was rechambered to 308 by the Spanish armory. I mainly shoot surplus brass reloads. So they are a bit off a full 308 loads. Either way I feed it what it shoots best. And a few hundred in so far it likes 165/168. It's a tough old rifle, I keep feeding it what it likes.
 
I have a m1916 Spanish mauser circa 1927. It was rechambered to 308 by the Spanish armory. I mainly shoot surplus brass reloads. So they are a bit off a full 308 loads. Either way I feed it what it shoots best. And a few hundred in so far it likes 165/168. It's a tough old rifle, I keep feeding it what it likes.

I have a couple of these rifles also rechambered to .308.

I made up some reduced loads using cast PC'd and GC'd bullets using 2400 but haven't had a chance to try them yet.

What I really want to do is convert one (maybe both) to 7.62x39.

I don't know if It can be done (I did find one company that had a conversation available at one time but seems that it's no longer offered) but I think it would be a match made in heaven if it could.
 
I have a couple of these rifles also rechambered to .308.

I made up some reduced loads using cast PC'd and GC'd bullets using 2400 but haven't had a chance to try them yet.

What I really want to do is convert one (maybe both) to 7.62x39.

I don't know if It can be done (I did find one company that had a conversation available at one time but seems that it's no longer offered) but I think it would be a match made in heaven if it could.
That might be possible with a barrel set back depending on your profile. Going larger is usually easier....
 
Small ring Mausers, including the Swedes, were designed and built for a 43,000 psia cartridge, which was 3,000 atmospheres. This same cartridge was used in the 98 Mauser actions up to WW2.

Rifle Magazine Issue 159 May 1995 Dear Editor pg 10

http://www.riflemagazine.com/magazine/PDF/ri159partial.pdf
Ludwig Olsen :

Mauser 98 actions produced by Mauser and DWM were proofed with two loads that produced approximately 1000 atmosphere greater pressure than normal factory rounds. That procedure was in accordance with the 1891 German proof law. Proof pressure for the Mauser 98 in 7 X57 was 4,050 atmospheres (57, 591 psi). Pressure of the normal 7 X 57 factory load with 11.2 gram bullet was given in Mauser’s 1908 patent boot as 3,050 atmosphere, or 43, 371 pounds.

While many Mausers in the 1908 Brazilian category will likely endure pressures considerably in excess of the 4,050 atmospheres proof loads, there might be some setback of the receiver locking shoulder with such high pressures

Kunhausen shows similar numbers in his book : “The Mauser Bolt Actions, A Shop Manual”

Rifle & Carbine 98: M98 Firearms of the German Army from 1898 to 1918 Dieter

M98 Mauser service rifles underwent a 2 round proof at 4,000 atm gas pressure, 1 atm = 14.6 psi, 4000 atm = 58, 784 psia. Page 103. A comment on the metallurgy and process technology of the era, Dieter found records that indicated that the bolt lugs broke on 1:1000 of GEW98 service rifles used by the Bavarian Army Corp!


Gun Digest 1975 has an excellent article, “A History of Proof Marks, Gun Proof in German” by Lee Kennett.

“The problem of smokeless proof was posed in a dramatic way by the Model 1888 and it commercial derivates. In this particular case a solution was sought in the decree of 23 July 1893. This provided that such rifles be proved with a government smokeless powder known as the “4,000 atmosphere powder”, proof pressure was 4,000 metric atmospheres or 58,000 psia. The 4000 atmosphere proof was standardized for the 1893 and continued after 1911.

The article indicates it was applied to the 1898. The 1939 German proof law called for proof at 130% of service load pressure. From Mauser Bolt Rifles by Ludwig Olsen, page 134, The maximum working pressure of the WW2 German 7.9 sS cartridge was 46, 926 psi. According to sources, this round was used in machine guns after WW1 and then shortly before WW2, became a universal issue round. Use in the K98 action had to have been examined, and I expect the decision to use in the K98 would have been based on the improvement of metal quality and process technology. A proof pressure 7.9sS would be 61k psi.
 
That might be possible with a barrel set back depending on your profile. Going larger is usually easier....

Have you any experience with this type of conversation or know someone who has?
Or us this just a theory on what you believe is possible.

I believe that a conversation go the x39 would be something that I definitely would like to try but I'm not willing to be a trailblazing guinea pig on this.

Setting the barrel back and rechambering is one thing but, to find out the mag rails would need completely "re-engineered", bolt face extensively modified etc isn't really worth it in a rifle that might, optimistically, be worth $100.

FWIW, I walked one of my 2 rifles around a gunshow in the fall and the best offer I got was $150.
 
I haven't had it done myself but learned about it for changing a 243 to a 6mmbr. The shank of the barrel has to be long enough to thread before it tapers to allow the extra case length cut off and any change in case tapper. The case head is entirely different and would have to addressed separately. In my savages, the front of the bolt is removable and easily changed. In a military gun if the case head is different, that alone would exceed your budget. From what little I know about your situation it would be a hard pass... I do recommend you learn what is required and the costs so it doesn't nagg in the back of your mind. Besides knowledge is gooder.
 
i have been buying up a few sporter swedish rifles built after ww-2 with commersial FN actions (simpson imported them) they are in 8mm for very good money in very good condition with ex bores for around 400-450 usd. the bottom rifle is a custom swedish rifle in 9.3x62, you can have them rebarreled or rebored and rechambered to what you want and have a solid action.
 

Attachments

  • DSCN1224.JPG
    DSCN1224.JPG
    166.3 KB · Views: 11
  • DSCN1225.JPG
    DSCN1225.JPG
    174.2 KB · Views: 12
  • DSCN1228 (2).JPG
    DSCN1228 (2).JPG
    157.1 KB · Views: 11
I haven't had it done myself but learned about it for changing a 243 to a 6mmbr. The shank of the barrel has to be long enough to thread before it tapers to allow the extra case length cut off and any change in case tapper. The case head is entirely different and would have to addressed separately. In my savages, the front of the bolt is removable and easily changed. In a military gun if the case head is different, that alone would exceed your budget. From what little I know about your situation it would be a hard pass... I do recommend you learn what is required and the costs so it doesn't nagg in the back of your mind. Besides knowledge is gooder.

Thank you for your insight.
Whether I like the answer or not I certainly appreciate your candor.

I'm not ruling anything out but, I might have to get very creative if it is worth seeing the project through.

If I could find a CZ or even a Ruger locally to give it a good "once over" I suppose I wouldn't even be talking about this now.

I don't have the tools to do it myself but it would be the ultimate in personal satisfaction if I could.
 
i have been buying up a few sporter swedish rifles built after ww-2 with commersial FN actions (simpson imported them) they are in 8mm for very good money in very good condition with ex bores for around 400-450 usd. the bottom rifle is a custom swedish rifle in 9.3x62, you can have them rebarreled or rebored and rechambered to what you want and have a solid action.

I few concerns about chambering a military Mauser in its original cartridge (for function reasons) and keeping within military issue pressures. Good military cartridges operated low to middle 40 Kpsia because that allowed a lot of pressure margin in extreme temperatures. Some of these military cartridges were used in the hottest and cold regions of this earth. And, more does not necessarily mean more for a military cartridge. The WW1 cartridges were all about extending the lethal range of the bullet, and that meant keeping all shots within a human with a bayonet at distance.

This is from my Dad's JROTC Handbook, pre WW2

WVofg0O.jpg

aUpUjf4.jpg

A cartridge that could keep its bullet that flat out to 1000 yards, was going to poke a hole in someone. And it did not require 60 kpsia pressures to do it.

Military actions were designed and built, that is they used plain carbon steels, not medium or high alloys, for relatively low pressure cartridges. At least low pressure compared with today. I will also caution about wartime actions. The incentive during wartime is to get the things out the door. And, a hugely expanding industrial base means a whole heck of a lot of know nothings are on the factory floors. This is always been a problem in the last two World Wars, enthusiastic factory workers join the military in the first three to six months of the war, and then, factory production has to be expanded several thousand percent, and the workers who knew how to make product, were out huffing and puffing during marches. I have recently finished a book about British WW1 Artillery. Recoil spring production for 18 pound howitzers was ramped up. In the rush to expand production, bad steel was shipped , and factory quality control lost control, so to speak. Just under 20% of all 18 pound howitzers were inoperable, at any one time, due to broken recoil springs. What was also nasty to read, Britain paid American shell manufacturer's good money for good shells, and found, shells filled with saw dust instead of high explosive. Saw dust is a lot cheaper than high explosive, which may not be available to meet delivery dates! This might account for some of the 30% dud rate for artillery shells!

I recently conducted a quick study of WW2 Japanese steel production. Most of the Imperial Japanese Army's steel was imported from conquered countries. And the workers in those factories were slave laborer's. Do you think the slaves were doing whatever they could get away with, to ship their Japanese overseers the worst steel possible? You bet they were. And ditto for the Germans. by 1943 slaves were the majority work force in German factories.

However commercial actions, particularly the post war FN, as long as you stay within the pressures of the cartridges they were built for there should be no problem. The 270 Win is actually a pretty high pressure round.

bnAne1h.jpg


belted magnums are not a good conversion. These pictures were posted as FN Deluxe bolt in 264 Win Mag. Don't know if the FN Deluxe was made in 264 Win Mag, but someone sure cracked these lugs with excessive bolt thrust.

hj3zR0u.jpg


Nz9QBtI.jpg


SynuGJ5.jpg

kwcGlKQ.jpg


Weatherby initially used FN commercial actions, and I am 100% certain Weatherby Customer Service received enough back, with cracked lugs, that Weatherby had to create his all new Mark V. Wiki claims that the old actions were suitable, and production issues forced Weatherby's hand, but I am skeptical.

lq4gQjf.jpg
 
frank de hass does not agree with you about post war 98 fn actions.

That is not the full and complete story. Just read the FN section in "Bolt Action Rifles". Frank relates a FN Deluxe rifle, probably rebarreled or rechambered by him, to 300 H&H Improved Magnum. This is one of the actions where the feed ramp was reduced to length the magazine. Frank claims these actions "should be safe for 50 K (CUP) cartridges", but this action cracked its lugs. (someone who spends the money for a 300 H&H Improved barrel, is probably running the pressures insanely hot) Frank attributes the lug cracking to set back in the receiver seats, which is good assumption, but he attributes the set back due to the feed ramp reduction. He does not know this to be true. He does not know the steels used in FN actions, merely states that "you can be sure it is the best", and he sure as heck did not create a finite element model to look at lug stresses given the pressures and materials used. He does not know a reasonable fatigue lifetime given the loads on the bolt and receiver seats. Also, bolt thrust is internal pressures times cartridge case head diameter (worst case). The magnum bolt face is wider. I have had posters quibble whether bolt thrust is calculated based on ID or OD at maximum case head separation, but in a comparison of military Mausers, designed for a 43,000 psia 8mm, here are some bolt thrust numbers


From Cartridges of the World

8 mm case head diameter 0.470” Area 0.1735 square inches
300 Win Mag case head diameter 0.515” Area 0.2083 square inches

Bolt face loads

8mm (Mauser design loads) 0.1735 in ² X 43, 371 lbs/ in ² = 7, 525 lbs

300 Win Mag = 0.2083 in ² X 65,000 lbs/ in ² = 13, 539 lbs

The 300 Win Mag provides an 80% increase in bolt thrust over standard military loads. You can play with the numbers for a 270 Win if you want. And that is if the reloader is not creating 80,000 to 90,000 psia reloads! I am going to claim, the sort of person who wants a belted magnum cartridge, is exactly the sort of person who pours on the coal, and if the rifle does not blow up within ten shots, thinks his reloads are safe!

Now one thing I would like to know, what were the pressures of the original H&H Magnum cartridges as assembled by H&H England and used in pre WW2 Mauser actions?. The cartridges were proprietary to H&H in England. Based on an article in a gun magazine, period H&H catalogs are quoting velocities maybe 100 fps more than a 30-06. I don't remember the exact numbers, but they were below, by a good margin the velocities once Winchester had the round approved in the USA, back in the 1920's? But the pre 64 M70 was always sized for H&H length cartridges, and I am going to claim, sized for the American standards set by Winchester for their 300 H&H and 375 H&H. And the M70 was made in 4140 steel, a much higher grade of steel than the 1035 (Hatcher) used in German Mausers. So if anyone has those pre WW2 proprietary H&H pressure standards, please put them out there.

To stir the pot more, Frank's book was copy righted in 1971, so he was writing the thing around 1965 onwards, a guess. The book had to be compete about a year before publication. So most of the FN Deluxe rifles on the market were around 10 to 15 years old, and FN probably had spare parts. Not now! Lets say the early FN Deluxe's are 70 years old, just how much does a magnum bolt cost? And who has them? About 25 years ago I purchased from Jack First a "FN commercial bolt" with a standard bolt face. I was disappointed it was an FN Supreme bolt, not FN Deluxe. The Supreme had a trigger blocking safety. I kept the bolt though I paid about $200.00 for it. Supreme actions are going for under $500. Gunbroker has a FN Deluxe bolt with a 30-06 bolt face for $337.50, (four days to go!) a bargain if it means, without that bolt, the rifle is a paperweight. I wonder what the Magnum bolt face version would go for, since they are rarer. There is no guarantee a replacement bolt, won't also require some other changes. We would love all repairs to be simple drop ins, and sometimes it happens. I saw on Wheeler Dealers, the car repair show had to fabricate a custom gear, because originals were not around. It took a CAD/CAM model to design, and then writing the software for the CNC machine, and when the part was fabricated, it was not cheap. But without it, the car was a potted plant container.

I think anyone with a FN Deluxe action in a belted magnum, should be reloading his magnum cartridges at the low end of the spectrum. It will last longer.
 
i don,t try to make a magnum out of a standard action and i don,t overload shells, thos two things can ruin any action. i have five post war commercial fn actioned rifles and have not had any problems at all with them(fireing many thousands of rounds). by adhering to the two things mentioned above.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top