Republicanism shown to be genetic in origin

Status
Not open for further replies.

colubrid

Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2003
Messages
133
The discovery that affiliation with the Republican Party is genetically
determined, announced by scientists in the current issue of the journal
NURTURE, has caused uproar among traditionalists who believe it is a
chosen lifestyle. Reports of the gene coding for political conservatism,
discovered after a decades-long study of quintuplets in Orange County,
CA, has sent shock waves through the medical, political, and golfing
communities.

Psychologists and psychoanalysts have long believed that Republicans'
unnatural disregard for the poor, and frequently unconstitutional
tendencies, resulted from dysfunctional family dynamics -- a remarkably
high percentage of Republicans do have authoritarian domineering fathers
and emotionally distant mothers, who didn't teach them how to be kind
and gentle. Biologists have long suspected that conservatism is
inherited. "After all," said one author of the NURTURE article, "It's
quite common for a Republican to have a brother or sister who is a
Republican."

Parents and Friends of Republicans (PFREP), who sometimes blame
themselves for the political views of otherwise lovable children,
family, and unindicted co-conspirators, have greeted the finding with
relief.

One mother, a longtime Democrat, wept and clapped her hands in ecstasy
on hearing of the findings. "I just knew it was genetic," she said,
seated with her two sons, both avowed Republicans. "My boys would never
freely choose that lifestyle!" When asked what the Republican lifestyle
was, she said, "You can just tell watching their conventions in Houston
and San Diego on TV: the flaming xenophobia, flamboyant demagogy,
disdain for anyone not rich, you know."

Both sons had suspected their Republicanism from an early age, but did
not confirm it until they were in college, when they became convinced it
wasn't just a phase they were going through.

The NURTURE article offered no response to the suggestion that the high
incidence of Republicanism among siblings could result from their
sharing not only genes but also psychological and emotional attitude as
products of the same parents and family dynamics.

A remaining mystery is why many Democrats admit to having voted
Republican at least once -- or often dream or fantasize about doing so.
Polls show that three out of five adult Democrats have had a Republican
experience, although most outgrow teenage experimentation with
Republicanism.


Some Republicans hail the findings as a step toward eliminating
conservophobia. They argue that since Republicans didn't "choose" their
lifestyle any more than someone "chooses" to have a ski-jump nose, they
shouldn't be denied civil rights, which other minorities enjoy.

If conservatism is not the result of stinginess or orneriness (typical
stereotypes attributed to Republicans), but is something Republicans
can't help, there's no reason why society shouldn't tolerate Republicans
in the military or even high elected office -- provided they don't
flaunt their political beliefs.

For many Americans, the discovery opens a window on a different future.
In a few years, gene therapy might eradicate Republicanism altogether.

But should they be allowed to marry?
 
I'll bet it has more to do with left brain dominant traits like logic, analysis, reasoning and computational abilities. Most of the libertarians I know are problem solvers by profession.

You can inherit left/right brain dominance from your parents so it naturally makes sense for some of it to be genetic.
 
unnatural disregard for the poor

True, as pertains to government intervention. i.e. I'll give my money to the poor as I see fit (and I do); I don't need the government taking my money and giving it to people who may or may not be "poor."
 
Unnatural disdain for the poor?

If the Democrats have so much support and sympathy for the poor, why are there so many crazy homeless here in California? :confused:
 
Uh, this is a joke, right?

I really hope so. It sounds like that crap racist pseudo - science that was coming out of Berlin in the 30's and 40's.
 
Psychologists and psychoanalysts have long believed that Republicans'
unnatural disregard for the poor

Heavilly Republican States such as Texas, Utah, and much of the Republican South far exceed the Liberal DemocRat states like Massachusetts, N.J., Rhode Island, etc. in private charitable giving.

Great Society programs have done more to retard the upward progress of the poor than any other factor. Every measure of social pathology amongst the poor in the USA skyrocketed after the huge social-welfare programs of the 60's and 70's were instituted by the Liberal DemocRats.
 
"Grandma Was Really Sick"

"I'll never forget that horrible evening I took my grandmother to the emergency room. And after an hour of pacing the doctor said, "Emo, your grandmother is on an artificial life support system. Although her brain is dead, her heart is still beating."

I said, 'Oh my God, we've never had a Democrat in the family before.'"

-Emo Phillips-

:evil:
 
Good one, Thumper! :D

Some of the rest of you, however, seem to wish to prove that the Republican Gene is chromosomally linked with the Lack Of A Sense Of Humor Gene. ;)



(P.J. O'rourke's grandmother, on seeing him come home on vactaion from college attired in frayed jeans, love beads, and long hair, asked "You're not turning into a Democrat, are you, P.J.?"
"Grandma!" he responded, "Democrats and Republicans are both fascist pigs! LBJ is oppressing the poor and killing children in Vietnam! How can I be a Democrat? I'm a Maoist!"
"Just as long as you're not a Democrat, honey." ;) )
 
While ya'll are fantacizing,....

...I've been searching the net. Look what I found.


Subject: PRELIMINARY PROGRAM - 2004 Democrat NAT. CONVENTION


FIRST EVENING ACTIVITIES
6:00pm - Opening flag burning ceremony.
6:30pm - Anti-war rally no. 1. Jane Fonda honorary hostess.
6:40pm - Ted Kennedy proposes a toast.
7:00pm - Tribute theme to France.
7:10pm - Collect offerings for al-Zawahri defense fund.
7:20pm - Ted Kennedy proposes a toast
7:25pm - Tribute theme to Spain.
7:45pm - Anti-war rally no. 2. (Moderated by Michael Moore)
8:00pm - John Kerry presents one side of the issues
8:25pm - Ted Kennedy proposes a toast.
8:30pm - Terrorist appeasement workshop.
9:00pm - Gay marriage ceremony.
9:30pm - * Intermission *
10:00pm - Flag burning ceremony no. 2.
10:15pm - Re-enactment of Kerry's fake medal toss.
10:30pm - Cameo by Dean 'Yeeearrrrrrrg!'
10:40pm - Ted Kennedy proposes a toast.
10:50pm - Pledge of allegiance to the UN.
11:00pm - Double gay marriage ceremony.
11:15pm - Maximizing Welfare workshop.
11:20pm - John Kerry presents the other side of the issues
11:30pm - 'Free Saddam' pep rally.
11:59pm - Ted Kennedy proposes a toast.
12:00am - Ted Kennedy offers a motion to adjourn to the bar.
2:00am - Ted Kennedy offers to drive all single women under
age 25 to their hotels.



I'm looking for the day two and three agenda. Can anyone help out?

rr
 
Day two:

6:00 PM No flags left: Pledge of allegience to the UN slated
6:05 PM "Will someone please go wake the Senator from Massachusetts?"
6:07 PM A dishevelled Ted Kennedy proposes a toast.
6:10 PM Media appreciation ceremony
7:00 PM Celebrity appreciation ceremony
8:00 PM European delegate appreciation ceremony
9:00 PM French delegate surrenders in confusion
10:00PM Argument breaks out between John Kerry and French delegate as to who surrendered first
10:12PM Activities disolve in confusion, broken up by local Boy Scout Troop


2:13 AM Ted Kennedy proposes a toast
 
Liberalism, OTOH responds well to the 12 Steps:

1. We admitted we were powerless over our codependancy (and unable to run the private affairs of everyone in the world) -- that our lives had become unmanageable.

2. Came to believe that a Power greater than ourselves could restore us to sanity.

3. Made a decision to turn our will and our lives over to the care of God as we understood Him.

4. Made a searching and fearless moral inventory of ourselves.



et cetera
 
This is so wrong on so many levels I cannot begin to comment.

Nope, I won't even go there with quotes, except that Republicans are no friends of ours either - both "sides" still want a totalitarian "democracy" to make me want to puke my guts out.

Given the choice, I'd go Republican - just a bit slower over the same damnable cliff. & the only difference is we get to drive off a bit slower, but to what eventual end?

Still, the result is the same & ya know what? we haven't a single viable "libertarian candidate," with any viability that could turn any of this around.

We are purely screwed.
 
I used to want November to hurry up and be here, because of deer season. This sort of drivel makes me want November to hurry up and be here so the election can be done with.

Trouble is, nowadays, the post-mortem seems to be as endless as the campaigning...

OT

Art
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top