The necessity to do "heavy" Roll crimps is over-rated in my opinion, and I keep hearing the same thing over and over again from literally dozens of different people, and I got to wondering if theyre all just starting to repeat one another. I beg the question whether a roll crimp, light or heavy is even required at all.....
So, I tested it out.
I'm speaking to it having an effect on how WW-296 (arguably the most "roll crimp required!" powder there is) burns and the result on end product. I understand in a tube magazine to prevent bullet setback, fine and dandy. But ive found that good case tension in pistol rounds like 357 and 44 Mag, prevents this anyways. Use a slight roll crimp for insurance, fine and dandy.
If you're shooting heavy loads especially in a light weight or short barreled revolver, bullet pull/creep under recoil can occur, ive seen it. But only in bullets that don't have a cannlure. If the bullets have a cannelure, a medium taper crimp on the cannelure has been sufficient to prevent bullet pull/creep in every load ive ever shot in 357 or 44 mag, from hot to not. Snubbies, 4 inchers you name it.
As for ignition and consistency, I've found the exact same ballistics in WW-296 loads in 357 and 44 Magnum whether there's a good taper crimp or a roll crimp. Velocities the same, accuracy the same. Cleanliness/unburnt powder the same.
I'm not sure if the dimensions of my resizing dies allow for excellent neck tension where these variables are diminished compared to some others out there? I'm always thinking that with too much roll crimp, the lead is swaged down and as the brass springs back a little bit, the lead core/jacket stays swaged down, effectively reducing all the good case tension you created in step 3.
Roll crimps must be done carefully and with the right die. I've seen them flubbed up.
Do em right, just do em light?