DMK
Member
Sam, you are correct in that I'm applying logic to the problem and comparing two nearly identical situations to derive a supposition. The BATF does not always apply logic to their decisions so reality and theory may not coincide. I am comfortable that I am in the right as far as the spirit and letter of the law, but that doesn't mean that the BATF would agree with me.Quote:
"Even if you did void the rifle's C&R status, the rifle would still be importable as it does not have enough evil features"
So this is incorrect?
Quote:
"Therefore, since an SKS exibits some of these characteristics, it is banned from importation under section 925(d)(3). However, subsection (e)(1) of the same section allows for its importation because of its current designation as a Curio and Relic (the 20th item down on this list: http://www.atf.treas.gov/firearms/cu...0505update.htm)."
Are you assuming, or do you know for sure? Comparing it to a PSL may make logical sense, but might not be in line with the BATF's views.
Can you provide the full link to that BATF document? When you cut & pasted it from the other forum, the link got truncated.