S&W CS9/Sig 239/Kahr P9 Comparison

[tracer]

I have owned the last two and was wondering about the S&W.I have never considered an S&W auto,but now am curious,after so many glowing reports.How does the trigger on the CS9 compare to the other two? I understand the Kahr is unique in both design and function,but am interested in your SUBJECTIVE opinions.Thanks to all who answer.
Tracer

 

[PCRCCW]

The Kahr and Sig triggers are both better than the CS9's. Its got a traditional d/a S&W trigger. The CS is a good little gun and those who like them sware by them...but IMO they arent that small for what you get and the grip just doesnt twiddle my knobs.
Shoot well

 

[rauburg]

I was having the exact same problem a couple of weeks ago. I was comparing the P9 and the CS9. The P9 was smaller and lighter but I really liked the look and feel of the CS9. The grips are a bit fat, maybe too fat for CCW, but they felt good in my hands. I don't think you could get much lighter than a CS9 in a metal frame though.

My solution, I got a P9 for CCW. The PM9 was too small for my tastes. However, the CS9 is still calling me. I am trying to decide to get rid of a P89 or a Taurus revolver so that I can get the CS9.