Spitzer bullet design motivations?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Warbow

Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
611
Location
Central Texas
Can anyone tell me about the history of spitzer bullets?

I always see people claiming that "they were designed to tumble in flesh." I figured that they were designed for the greatly improved ballistic coefficients which gave better trajectories and more range than flat and round-nosed bullets. The yawing in flesh, I thought, was just a secondary effect due to the shape and not really a primary design concern.

Do I have it mixed up? I'm just skeptical because the people who are usually saying this seem to be the ones who will also tell you that getting hit by a .45 ACP will "throw ya' across the dang room!"
 
I figured that they were designed for the greatly improved ballistic coefficients which gave better trajectories and more range than flat and round-nosed bullets. The yawing in flesh, I thought, was just a secondary effect due to the shape and not really a primary design concern.

You are correct. The spitzer was designed for better aerodynamics. The terminal ballistic effect was an unintended consequence of the design.
 
Spitzer is the german word for pointed.The pointed bullet is there for a higher ballistic coefficient [maintains velocity better]. Bullet yaw is due to bullet length vs twist rate of the rifling. That can be made to happen by choosing a twist that will stabilize the bullet in air but not in the target.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top