Stop Congress From Silencing Gun Owners--Call Your U.S. Senators

Status
Not open for further replies.

sm

member
Joined
Dec 22, 2002
Messages
28,387
Location
Between black coffee, and shiftn' gears
http://www.nraila.org/Legislation/Read.aspx?ID=2531



Stop Congress From Silencing Gun Owners--Call Your U.S. Senators

Tuesday, January 16, 2007

This week--perhaps even tomorrow--the U.S. Senate is taking up legislation that could stifle gun owners’ voices in the legislative process.

To ensure gun owners remain able to speak out in support of our Second Amendment rights, during debate this week on S.A. 3, the “Legislative Transparency and Accountability Act”, Senators Robert Bennett (R-Utah) and Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) will offer an amendment to strike Sec. 220--the section that would force countless groups of ordinary citizens to register with the federal government as “lobbyists,” with all the attendant restrictions, costs, and penalties.

The First Amendment protects an unqualified “right of the people … to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” One of NRA’s greatest strength is our members’ ability to fully use the First Amendment to protect the Second Amendment. But Sec. 220 would, for the first time in American history, regulate “the voluntary efforts of members of the general public to communicate their own views on an issue to Federal officials.” Among its everyday adverse effects would be the following:

* Organizations answering mail, e-mail, or telephone calls from people who may or may not be members would have to either verify each person’s status as a paying “member” as defined in Section 220, or refrain from urging those people to call Congress about legislative issues. Of course, every day, NRA engages in these types of activities with members and non-members alike.

* Organizations would have to screen e-mail subscriptions to exclude subscribers who are not paying members or else report all e-mail alerts as “paid efforts to stimulate grassroots lobbying.” This would have a severe impact on the Friday NRA-ILA Grassroots Alert--and on Special Alerts like this one.

Sec. 220 would also do a great disservice by increasing the power of the anti-gun media to the detriment of the people. For example, a privately-owned newspaper could run editorials every day advocating drastic restrictions on Second Amendment liberties--without being subject to any reporting requirements. However, if a staff member of a pro-gun organization, such as NRA, writes a letter to the editor of that newspaper that expresses an opposing view and urges readers to call their senators, that letter would be a “paid effort to stimulate grassroots lobbying.” The organization would have to report the cost of the staffer’s salary for writing and submitting the letter. This requirement would apply even if the newspaper never publishes the letter, since it is still a “paid attempt … to influence the general public.” (Emphasis added)

Similarly, if the grassroots organization pays an advertising agency to create and place a newspaper ad in the same newspaper, the advertising agency would have to register as a “grassroots lobbying firm” within 45 days of being retained and report costs of the communication--even if the ad never runs! The registration requirement would signal the group’s plans to opponents, and constitute a prior restraint on free speech, contrary to principles of the First Amendment.

Violations of any of these complex, technical provisions could be punishable by massive civil penalties and felony prison terms under the substitute bill that the Senate will consider. Ultimately, Sec. 220 would force so many organizations to report so many activities that the information would become useless. It would simply be impossible for interested observers to sort the wheat from the chaff.

The First Amendment protects the “right of the people”--not the “right of people who can afford teams of lawyers, accountants, and disclosure specialists.”

Because the ability of grassroots organizations to communicate with the public is so central to the First Amendment and our ability to protect the Second Amendment, we urge you to contact your U.S. Senators immediately and urge them to support the Bennett-McConnell Amendment (#20) to strike Section 220 in the “Legislative Transparency and Accountability Act.” You can reach your U.S. Senators at (202) 224-3121. You may also e-mail your Senators by clicking here: http://www.capwiz.com/nra/dbq/officials/.

Once you have contacted your two U.S. Senators, please urge your family, friends, and fellow firearm owners to do the same!


Copyright 2006, National Rifle Association of America, Institute for Legislative Action.
This may be reproduced. It may not be reproduced for commercial purposes.
 
The Senate, on a 55-43 vote, approved an amendment pushed by Sen. Robert Bennett, R-Utah, to strip a provision requiring reporting of "grass-roots" lobbying.

Backers said it would shine light on special interest groups that use "hired guns" to organize mass mailings, phone-ins or e-mail campaigns.

Opponents, including the American Civil Liberties Union and conservative groups such as the Traditional Values Coalition, argued that it was a free speech issue, discouraging people or groups from organizing petition drives.


Senate passes Democrats' ethics, lobbying bill
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/01/18/senate.ethics.ap/

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Senate, responding to voter frustration with corruption and special interest influence in Washington, on Thursday overwhelmingly approved far-reaching ethics and lobbying reform legislation.

Under the bill, passed 96-2, senators will give up gifts and free travel from lobbyists, pay more for travel on corporate jets and make themselves more accountable for the pet projects they insert into bills.

Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, who made the bill his first initiative as head of the Senate, called it the "most significant legislation in ethics and lobbying reform we've had in the history of this country."

The Senate did reject the idea of setting up an independent office to investigate the ethical breaches of members. But it said that spouses of sitting members will no longer be able to lobby the Senate and lobbyists can no longer pay for extravagant parties for members at national conventions.

Passage of the bill came a day after the measure appeared dead, the victim of a test of will between the two parties.

Republicans were angry they could not get a vote on a proposal giving the president, with congressional approval, more power to kill single spending items in larger bills. So GOP senators voted against a resolution needed to move the bill to final passage. (Full story)

On Thursday morning, both sides accused the other of killing the bill and betraying the trust of voters who had demanded that Congress clean up its act.

"What this maneuver shows is that the Republican leadership hasn't learned the lessons of the 2006 election," said Sen. Charles Schumer, D-New York.

"The Democrat leadership does not have to kill this legislation," countered Republican leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky. "I believe that we owe it to the voters as well as the institution to come to a fair agreement and pass this legislation."

Under the agreement reached Thursday, the sponsor of the line-item veto amendment, Sen. Judd Gregg, R-New Hampshire, will be allowed to offer his proposal as part of the next bill to reach the Senate floor, a proposal to raise the minimum wage while giving small businesses several tax breaks. That will take place on Monday.

The ethics and lobbying legislation would:

• Bar lawmakers from accepting gifts, travel and lodging paid for by lobbyists.

• Extend from one to two years the time a former member must wait before he can engage in lobbying activities.

• Deny pensions to lawmakers convicted of serious crimes.

• Require more reporting by lobbyists on their activities.

• Require public disclosure of those home-state projects.

• Require senators hitching rides on private jets to pay full charter rates rather than the current practice of paying the far cheaper equivalent of a first class ticket.

• Require reporting by lobbyists who obtain small donations from clients and then "bundle" them into larger contributions to politicians.

• Prevent spouses of sitting members from lobbying.

The Senate, on a 55-43 vote, approved an amendment pushed by Sen. Robert Bennett, R-Utah, to strip a provision requiring reporting of "grass-roots" lobbying.

Backers said it would shine light on special interest groups that use "hired guns" to organize mass mailings, phone-ins or e-mail campaigns.

Opponents, including the American Civil Liberties Union and conservative groups such as the Traditional Values Coalition, argued that it was a free speech issue, discouraging people or groups from organizing petition drives.

The Senate also defeated, for the second straight year, a proposal to create an Office of Public Integrity to take over some of the investigative duties of the ethics committee.

Supporters said the public, in the wake of scandals involving former lobbyist Jack Abramoff and former Rep. Mark Foley, suspected the ability of lawmakers to police themselves. The vote against the new office was 71-27.

Fred Wertheimer of Democracy 21, part of a coalition of groups pressing for lobbying reform, said the groups were disappointed with the votes on grass-roots lobbying and the Office of Public Integrity.

But he said the bill responded to the "deep concerns of the American people about corruption and ethics problems in Congress" and "will change the way business is done in the Senate."

Democrats are determined to show voters they are changing the way Washington works so they made the measure their first order of business after assuming power in the Senate.

The House, on its first day of Democratic control, changed some of the rules concerning gifts, meals and travel from lobbyists. The House is scheduled to take up legislation next month that, like the Senate bill, would change lobbying law and require a House-Senate compromise.

Voting against the bill were Republicans Tom Coburn of Oklahoma and Orrin Hatch of Utah. Sens. Sam Brownback, R-Kansas, and Tim Johnson, D-South Dakota, did not vote.
 
It will be interesting to see if the Democrats can live with their own law, especially when they are looking for money as we move toward the 2008 election.

As it is said: Be careful about what you wish for because you might get it... :evil:
 
BIG NEWS TODAY:

An amendment to this (stupid) bill, to eliminate the section pertaining to individuals, was put up for vote today.

Offered by Sens. Robert Bennett (R-Utah) and Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), the amendment removed Section 220 that would have forced ordinary citizens to register with the federal government as "lobbyists," with all the attendant restrictions, costs, and penalties.

See how your Senator voted here: (Does anyone Detect a Distinct pattern here?
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=110&session=1&vote=00017

Kudos to the NRA for the alert email and handy link to the Senate roll call.
 
My state senator's Brady Campaign grades from the Brady Campaign site:

Evan Bayh, Democrat - 83% supporting the Brady Campaign

Richard Lugar, Republican - 51% supporting the Brady Campaign.


My Congressman, Mike Pence - 0% supporting Brady Campaign


Seems like my congressman knows where its at, and not my senators.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top