Targets in Massachusetts
An earlier post states:
Even here in the US, it is illegal for "civilians" to shoot at any target resembling a human in the state of Massachusetts (this includes silhouettes).
The above is a popular misconception based in a partial reading of a law.
The real story is covered in an article I posted to
www.boudrie.com two years ago:
Humanoid Targets in Massachusetts
A Clarification
Rob Boudrie, May 10 2002
I have recently received questions about news reports that the United States Court of Appeals for the first circuit recently upheld the Massachusetts General Law which prohibits shooting at human targets, and how it will affect USPSA/IPSC matches in this state.
These comments are offered with the usual disclaimer that I am not a lawyer, and this does not constitute any manner commentary is not "legal advice."
The short answer is It will have not mandate any changes in our match procedures.
Here's why it doesn't effect our matches
Chapter 180 of 1998 included a provision which mandates that a club which holds a "Class A License to Carry Firearms" must prohibit the firing at "targets that depict human figures, human effigies, human silhouettes or any human images thereof, except by public safety personnel performing in line with their official duties."
The relevant facts:
Nothing in Masschusetts Law requires a club to apply for or obtain a License to Carry Firearms. (Any Massachusetts resident who wishes to purchase or posess a handgun must, however, obtain such a license - but that is not a "club" license).
No USPSA Affiliated clubs in Massachusetts hold a Massachusetts Club License to Carry Firearms. Since the provision of Chapter 180 pertaining to humanoid targets applies only to Clubs holding such a license, the prohibition does not impact any member clubs.
I am not aware of any Massachusetts club not affiliated with USPSA which has obtained a club license to carry firearms.
What if it did?
Even if Massachusetts residents were prohibited from using our primary target, I would not support a "least common demonimator" approach for the United States Region.
Interesting Article
The Findlaw website has an interesting article on this decision.
Rob Boudrie