See the Python illustration at
http://www.gunbroker.com/auction/ViewItem.asp?Item=10753172
And note how the frame is thicker at the front, where it meets the end of the barrel ramp.
I have an old, pre-Trooper
Colt .357 revolver (NOT marked DPS) and the frame is identical to the one with the Python barrel. I’m pretty sure the barrel is not a chop job, but a righteous three-inch factory job - - see how well the lettering on both sides is centered.
I question the authenticity of the DPS stamp, as well. Since first reading this thread, I examined an authenticated S&W 19-2, DPS 22078. The numbers are larger, of a different font, and the “DPS†is clearly put on with a single stamp, while the numerals are just
slightly out, indicating they were applied separately. The Colt’s number, 22402, is so near that I think it unlikely the small armorer’s shop at DPS would change stamps and application methods in that short a time. If the number is not authentic, then the assembler gets credit for using the proper number range.
In fairness, DPS did indeed procure a small number of of the old .357 pre-Troopers, prior to S&W meeting their order for the de-tuned .357 which became known as the Highway Patrolman, and later as the model 28. One of those Colts might have been available for this adaptation, differing stamp style notwithstanding.
The revolver in question is a non-Python of some kind with the barrel installed and Python stocks added. It would be possible to do same with the Officers Model Match or OM Special, but then you’d need to fit the magnum cylinder as well. The screws are messed up and the polish on the frame and trigger is definitely not up to Python standards. I think it is a $200 parts gun, if it is worth that much.
Yup, it’d be worth a pretty penny if correct, but I fear this one is NOT.
Best,
Johnny
