I do not forcedly agree Wickard was touted as being more than it was. The facts may have been such that things were not as remote from fed control and interstate issues but the holding was essentially what you describe for Raich. Raich affirmed and strengthened it perhaps but Wickard was a very expansive holding even if it didn't need to be based on what the facts really were.
BTW I intiatially mention Wickard simply because it is the case those senators would have read in school. Raich came a good while latter. None of them practice con law so who knows what they are up on, but I am sure Wickard is in their minds as to the expansiveness of the CC.
I'm doubtful it would do anything more than incite a pissing match and at the end of the day the United States will be able to pee MUCH higher on the fence than WY.
BTW I intiatially mention Wickard simply because it is the case those senators would have read in school. Raich came a good while latter. None of them practice con law so who knows what they are up on, but I am sure Wickard is in their minds as to the expansiveness of the CC.
They may well, but as has been pointed out on here by many, getting arrested, charged, etc isn't a whole lot of fun. A few Feds have to go through the trouble, and it very well may slow down some of the obvious nit picking cases.
I'm doubtful it would do anything more than incite a pissing match and at the end of the day the United States will be able to pee MUCH higher on the fence than WY.