All you guys telling me to lighten up or chill out can go pound sand as I'm about to explain the tone of my post.
Jim, for the third thread now, two on this subject, you have responded in a sarcastic, condescending and inflammatory manner. I really don't understand the reasoning behind it, your perception of my post or why it sticks in your craw. Judging by the many conversations I've had on this subject, a lot of people have some misconceptions about cylinder rings. Many believe a ring is just a fact of life and that it is normal on ALL revolvers, single and double action. This is simply not true and all I try to do is shed some light on the subject with a technical explanation. I'm not passing judgement, spitting on anyone's dog or talking about anyone's momma so I really don't understand what your problem is.
If you're okay with ringed cylinders on all your guns that's fine. All I'm trying to do is provide the information. Whoever is reading it is free to do with it as they wish. It has nothing to do with being perfect or having a stick up my ass. There's a right way and a wrong way to do everything and if you're blissful in your ignorance, then that is just fine with me. Just don't give me a bunch of sarcastic, condescending BS because I prefer to do it the right way. I'm sorry if telling you you're doing something wrong is such a blow to your ego. You are free to consult any major sixgunsmith or Colt specialist to gain the evidence you need. Or you can call USFA and ask Doug why they had to remove the lockwork in their guns at shows. I'll save you the trouble, it is because a lot of people do not know how to properly handle a traditional single action and their guns would be in need of a rebuild after the show if they didn't.
What is sad is that we have to have a knockdown, drag-out argument over something that should be common knowledge among serious revolver enthusiasts.