Well, it actually was close in this case to favoring those churches which opposed guns in church on religious grounds, and those which did not. In prior sessions the "church carry" bill could not get out of committee because of certain legislators on the relevant committee were basing their opposition on their religious views.Congress cannot support one particular religion, nor disparage one, but it can pass laws that affect all religions equally.
Legislators have been basing their opinions on all sorts of legislation on their religion since time immemorial, so that's nothing new.baz said:Well, it actually was close in this case to favoring those churches which opposed guns in church on religious grounds, and those which did not. In prior sessions the "church carry" bill could not get out of committee because of certain legislators on the relevant committee were basing their opposition on their religious views.
This past summer I took a driving trip from Arkansas through Oklahoma, Nebraska, Colorado, Utah, Idaho, Oregon, California, and then back home through the Southwest. Only in Oregon and California (of course), did I have to remove my CCW and pack it away.In Oregon and Washington we have been able to carry guns in our churches for a long time.
I had to drive to Grant County, Oregon to get my Oregon out-of-state CHL. I agree the reciprocity deal is one of Oregon's greatest flaws and has been challenged quite a bit. On a bright note, I hear more and more sheriffs as of late are now issuing out-of-state permits, but you have to take a trip to Oregon, which is unfortunate.This past summer I took a driving trip from Arkansas through Oklahoma, Nebraska, Colorado, Utah, Idaho, Oregon, California, and then back home through the Southwest. Only in Oregon and California (of course), did I have to remove my CCW and pack it away.
Every state has idiosyncrasies about something.